Background Ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization (EIBS) is proposed to play a role in early and recurring steps of addiction. EIBS does not occur uniformly in all animals even from the same inbred strain. Since recent data demonstrate that epigenetic mechanisms are likely to be involved in the development and the persistence of ethanol-related behaviors, we explored the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in ethanol response after EIBS development. Methodology DBA/2J mice were i.p. injected with saline or ethanol (2 g/kg) once a day for 10 consecutive days. At day 17, ethanol-treated mice were split in resistant and sensitized groups. Brains were then removed 30 min after a saline or 2 g/kg ethanol challenge to assess i) gene expression using PCR array targeting 84 epigenetic-related genes and ii) histone deacetylases (HDAC), histone acetylases (HAT) and DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) activities as well as H4K12 acetylation. Principal Findings Acute ethanol administration decreased dnmt1, esco2 and rps6ka5 genes expression. These genes were similarly altered in sensitized but not in resistant mice after an ethanol challenge, suggesting that resistant mice were tolerant to the transcriptional outcomes of an ethanol challenge. Whereas global HAT or DNMT activity was not affected, global HDAC activity was reduced after an acute ethanol injection. HDAC inhibition occurred in all ethanol-treated mice but with a lesser extent in sensitized animals. As a consequence, H4 acetylation was specifically potentiated in the core of the Nac proportionally to the striatal HDAC activity decrease. Conclusions/Significance The present study highlights that the contrasted behavioral response to an ethanol challenge between resistant and sensitized mice may be mediated by epigenetic mechanisms occurring specifically in the striatum. Here we show that vulnerability to ethanol dependence and relapse could be, at least in part, due to individual variability in acute ethanol-induced epigenetic response.
References
[1]
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18: 247–291.
[2]
Steketee JD, Kalivas PW (2011) Drug wanting: behavioral sensitization and relapse to drug-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Rev 63: 348–365.
[3]
Vanderschuren LJ, Pierce RC (2010) Sensitization processes in drug addiction. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 3: 179–195.
[4]
Cador M, Bjijou Y, Stinus L (1995) Evidence of a complete independence of the neurobiological substrates for the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Neuroscience 65: 385–395.
[5]
Perugini M, Vezina P (1994) Amphetamine administered to the ventral tegmental area sensitizes rats to the locomotor effects of nucleus accumbens amphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270: 690–696.
[6]
Camarini R, Nogueira Pires ML, Calil HM (2000) Involvement of the opioid system in the development and expression of sensitization to the locomotor-activating effect of ethanol. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 3: 303–309.
[7]
Harrison SJ, Nobrega JN (2009) A functional role for the dopamine D3 receptor in the induction and expression of behavioural sensitization to ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 207: 47–56.
[8]
Kim AK, Souza-Formigoni ML (2010) Disulfiram impairs the development of behavioural sensitization to the stimulant effect of ethanol. Behav Brain Res 207: 441–446.
[9]
Fee JR, Sparta DR, Picker MJ, Thiele TE (2007) Corticotropin releasing factor-1 receptor antagonist, CP-154,526, blocks the expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in DBA/2J mice. Neuroscience 150: 14–21.
[10]
Abrahao KP, Quadros IM, Souza-Formigoni ML (2011) Nucleus accumbens dopamine D(1) receptors regulate the expression of ethanol-induced behavioural sensitization. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14: 175–185.
[11]
Masur J, dos Santos HM (1988) Response variability of ethanol-induced locomotor activation in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 96: 547–550.
[12]
Quadros IM, Hipolide DC, Frussa-Filho R, De Lucca EM, Nobrega JN, et al. (2002) Resistance to ethanol sensitization is associated with increased NMDA receptor binding in specific brain areas. Eur J Pharmacol 442: 55–61.
[13]
Quadros IM, Nobrega JN, Hipolide DC, de Lucca EM, Souza-Formigoni ML (2002) Differential propensity to ethanol sensitization is not associated with altered binding to D1 receptors or dopamine transporters in mouse brain. Addict Biol 7: 291–299.
[14]
Souza-Formigoni ML, De Lucca EM, Hipolide DC, Enns SC, Oliveira MG, et al. (1999) Sensitization to ethanol’s stimulant effect is associated with region-specific increases in brain D2 receptor binding. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146: 262–267.
[15]
Pandey SC, Ugale R, Zhang H, Tang L, Prakash A (2008) Brain chromatin remodeling: a novel mechanism of alcoholism. J Neurosci 28: 3729–3737.
[16]
Sakharkar AJ, Zhang H, Tang L, Shi G, Pandey SC (2012) Histone deacetylases (HDAC)-induced histone modifications in the amygdala: a role in rapid tolerance to the anxiolytic effects of ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 36: 61–71.
[17]
Pascual M, Do Couto BR, Alfonso-Loeches S, Aguilar MA, Rodriguez-Arias M, et al. (2012) Changes in histone acetylation in the prefrontal cortex of ethanol-exposed adolescent rats are associated with ethanol-induced place conditioning. Neuropharmacology 62: 2308–2318.
[18]
Sanchis-Segura C, Lopez-Atalaya JP, Barco A (2009) Selective boosting of transcriptional and behavioral responses to drugs of abuse by histone deacetylase inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 2642–2654.
[19]
Fuchs RA, Evans KA, Ledford CC, Parker MP, Case JM, et al. (2005) The role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus in contextual reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30: 296–309.
Anier K, Malinovskaja K, Aonurm-Helm A, Zharkovsky A, Kalda A (2010) DNA methylation regulates cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 2450–2461.
[22]
Tian W, Zhao M, Li M, Song T, Zhang M, et al. (2012) Reversal of cocaine-conditioned place preference through methyl supplementation in mice: altering global DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex. PLoS One 7: e33435.
[23]
Kim BJ, Kang KM, Jung SY, Choi HK, Seo JH, et al. (2008) Esco2 is a novel corepressor that associates with various chromatin modifying enzymes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 372: 298–304.
[24]
Brami-Cherrier K, Roze E, Girault JA, Betuing S, Caboche J (2009) Role of the ERK/MSK1 signalling pathway in chromatin remodelling and brain responses to drugs of abuse. J Neurochem 108: 1323–1335.
[25]
Gutierrez-Mecinas M, Trollope AF, Collins A, Morfett H, Hesketh SA, et al. (2011) Long-lasting behavioral responses to stress involve a direct interaction of glucocorticoid receptors with ERK1/2-MSK1-Elk-1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 13806–13811.
[26]
DiRocco DP, Scheiner ZS, Sindreu CB, Chan GC, Storm DR (2009) A role for calmodulin-stimulated adenylyl cyclases in cocaine sensitization. J Neurosci 29: 2393–2403.
[27]
Host L, Dietrich JB, Carouge D, Aunis D, Zwiller J (2011) Cocaine self-administration alters the expression of chromatin-remodelling proteins; modulation by histone deacetylase inhibition. J Psychopharmacol 25: 222–229.
[28]
Martin TA, Jayanthi S, McCoy MT, Brannock C, Ladenheim B, et al. (2012) Methamphetamine causes differential alterations in gene expression and patterns of histone acetylation/hypoacetylation in the rat nucleus accumbens. PLoS One 7: e34236.
[29]
de Ruijter AJ, van Gennip AH, Caron HN, Kemp S, van Kuilenburg AB (2003) Histone deacetylases (HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family. Biochem J 370: 737–749.
[30]
Pascual M, Boix J, Felipo V, Guerri C (2009) Repeated alcohol administration during adolescence causes changes in the mesolimbic dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems and promotes alcohol intake in the adult rat. J Neurochem 108: 920–931.
[31]
Kazantsev AG, Thompson LM (2008) Therapeutic application of histone deacetylase inhibitors for central nervous system disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7: 854–868.
[32]
Shukla SD, Velazquez J, French SW, Lu SC, Ticku MK, et al. (2008) Emerging role of epigenetics in the actions of alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32: 1525–1534.
[33]
Kalda A, Heidmets LT, Shen HY, Zharkovsky A, Chen JF (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulates the induction and expression of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization partially through an associated learning of the environment in mice. Behav Brain Res 181: 76–84.
[34]
Levine AA, Guan Z, Barco A, Xu S, Kandel ER, et al. (2005) CREB-binding protein controls response to cocaine by acetylating histones at the fosB promoter in the mouse striatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 19186–19191.
[35]
Cadoni C, Di Chiara G (2000) Differential changes in accumbens shell and core dopamine in behavioral sensitization to nicotine. Eur J Pharmacol 387: R23–25.
[36]
Nordquist RE, Voorn P, de Mooij-van Malsen JG, Joosten RN, Pennartz CM, et al. (2007) Augmented reinforcer value and accelerated habit formation after repeated amphetamine treatment. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17: 532–540.
[37]
Xu CM, Wang J, Wu P, Xue YX, Zhu WL, et al. (2011) Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta in the nucleus accumbens core is critical for methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. J Neurochem 118: 126–139.
[38]
Simon O’Brien E, Legastelois R, Houchi H, Vilpoux C, Alaux-Cantin S, et al. (2011) Fluoxetine, desipramine, and the dual antidepressant milnacipran reduce alcohol self-administration and/or relapse in dependent rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 1518–1530.
[39]
de Araujo NP, Fukushiro DF, Grassl C, Hipolide DC, Souza-Formigoni ML, et al. (2009) Ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization is associated with dopamine receptor changes in the mouse olfactory tubercle. Physiol Behav 96: 12–17.
[40]
Didone V, Quoilin C, Tirelli E, Quertemont E (2008) Parametric analysis of the development and expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in female Swiss mice: effects of dose, injection schedule, and test context. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 201: 249–260.
[41]
Boudreau AC, Wolf ME (2005) Behavioral sensitization to cocaine is associated with increased AMPA receptor surface expression in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 25: 9144–9151.
[42]
Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 4th Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
