全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Deimatic Display in the European Swallowtail Butterfly as a Secondary Defence against Attacks from Great Tits

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047092

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Many animals reduce the risk of being attacked by a predator through crypsis, masquerade or, alternatively, by advertising unprofitability by means of aposematic signalling. Behavioural attributes in prey employed after discovery, however, signify the importance of also having an effective secondary defence if a predator uncovers, or is immune to, the prey’s primary defence. In butterflies, as in most animals, secondary defence generally consists of escape flights. However, some butterfly species have evolved other means of secondary defence such as deimatic displays/startle displays. The European swallowtail, Papilio machaon, employs what appears to be a startle display by exposing its brightly coloured dorsal wing surface upon disturbance and, if the disturbance continues, by intermittently protracting and relaxing its wing muscles generating a jerky motion of the wings. This display appears directed towards predators but whether it is effective in intimidating predators so that they refrain from attacks has never been tested experimentally. Methodology/Principal Findings In this study we staged encounters between a passerine predator, the great tit, Parus major, and live and dead swallowtail butterflies in a two-choice experiment. Results showed that the dead butterfly was virtually always attacked before the live butterfly, and that it took four times longer before a bird attacked the live butterfly. When the live butterfly was approached by a bird this generally elicited the butterfly’s startle display, which usually caused the approaching bird to flee. We also performed a palatability test of the butterflies and results show that the great tits seemed to find them palatable. Conclusions/Significance We conclude that the swallowtail’s startle display of conspicuous coloration and jerky movements is an efficient secondary defence against small passerines. We also discuss under what conditions predator-prey systems are likely to aid the evolution of deimatic behaviours in harmless and palatable prey.

References

[1]  Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. New York: Longman Ltd.
[2]  Cuthill IC, Stevens M, Sheppard J, Maddocks T, Alejandro Párraga C, et al. (2005) Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434: 72–74.
[3]  Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Methuen & Co.
[4]  Skelhorn J, Rowland HM, Speed MP, Ruxton GD (2010) Masquerade: Camouflage Without Crypsis. Science 327: 51–51.
[5]  Mappes J, Marples N, Endler JA (2005) The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 598–603.
[6]  Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7]  Hasson O (1991) Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 325–329.
[8]  Lind J, Cresswell W (2005) Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior. Behav Ecol 16: 945–956.
[9]  Pie MR (2005) Signal evolution in prey recognition systems. Behav Process 68: 47–50.
[10]  Ruxton GD (2005) Intimidating butterflies. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 276–278.
[11]  Olofsson M, Vallin A, Jakobsson S, Wiklund C (2011) Winter predation on two species of hibernating butterflies: monitoring rodent attacks with infrared cameras. Anim Behav 81: 529–534.
[12]  Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Burns JM (2010) A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 11659–11665.
[13]  Bura VL, Rohwer VG, Martin PR, Yack JE (2011) Whistling in caterpillars (Amorpha juglandis, Bombycoidea): sound-producing mechanism and function. J Exp Biol 214: 30–37.
[14]  Vallin A, Jakobsson S, Lind J, Wiklund C (2006) Crypsis versus intimidation - anti-predation defence in three closely related butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59: 455–459.
[15]  Wahlberg N, Nylin S (2003) Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae). Cladistics-the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society 19: 213–223.
[16]  Thomas JA, Lewington R (2010) The butterflies of Britain and Ireland. Dorset: British Wildlife Publishing Ltd.
[17]  Brakefield PM, Shreeve TG, Thomas JA (1992) Avoidance, concealment, and defence. In: Dennis RLH, editor. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 93–119.
[18]  Vallin A, Jakobsson S, Lind J, Wiklund C (2005) Prey survival by predator intimidation: an experimental study of peacock butterfly defence against blue tits. Proc R Soc B 272: 1203–1207.
[19]  Blest AD (1957) The function of eyespot patterns in the Lepidoptera. Behaviour 11: 209–255.
[20]  Wiklund C, Sillén-Tullberg B (1985) Why distasteful butterflies have aposematic larvae and adults, but cryptic pupae - evidence from predation experiments on the monarch and the european swallowtail. Evolution 39: 1155–1158.
[21]  Poulton EB (1890) The colours of animals. New York: D. Appleton and company.
[22]  Sargent TD (1978) Maintenance of stability in hind-wing diversity among moths of genus Catocala (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Evolution 32: 424–434.
[23]  Schlenoff DH (1985) The startle responses of blue jays to Catocala (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) prey models. Anim Behav 33: 1057–1067.
[24]  Wiklund C (1974) The concept of oligophagy and the natural habitats and host plants of Papilio machaon L. in Fennoscandia. Entomologica scandinavica 5: 151–160.
[25]  R R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
[26]  Olofsson M, Jakobsson S, Wiklund C (2012) Auditory defence in the peacock butterfly (Inachis io) against mice (Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66: 209–215.
[27]  Langridge KV, Broom M, Osorio D (2007) Selective signalling by cuttlefish to predators. Current Biology 17: R1044–R1045.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133