Background Health services for victims of rape are recognised as a particularly neglected area of the health sector internationally. Efforts to strengthen these services need to be guided by clinical research. Expert medical evidence is widely used in rape cases, but its contribution to the progress of legal cases is unclear. Only three studies have found an association between documented bodily injuries and convictions in rape cases. This article aims to describe the processing of rape cases by South African police and courts, and the association between documented injuries and DNA and case progression through the criminal justice system. Methods and Findings We analysed a provincially representative sample of 2,068 attempted and completed rape cases reported to 70 randomly selected Gauteng province police stations in 2003. Data sheets were completed from the police dockets and available medical examination forms were copied. 1,547 cases of rape had medical examinations and available forms and were analysed, which was at least 85% of the proportion of the sample having a medical examination. We present logistic regression models of the association between whether a trial started and whether the accused was found guilty and the medico-legal findings for adult and child rapes. Half the suspects were arrested (n = 771), 14% (209) of cases went to trial, and in 3% (31) of adults and 7% (44) of children there was a conviction. A report on DNA was available in 1.4% (22) of cases, but the presence or absence of injuries were documented in all cases. Documented injuries were not associated with arrest, but they were associated with children's cases (but not adult's) going to trial (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for having genital and nongenital injuries 5.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87–18.13, p = 0.003). In adult cases a conviction was more likely if there were documented injuries, whether nongenital injuries alone AOR 6.25 (95% CI 1.14–34.3, p = 0.036), ano-genital injuries alone (AOR 7.00, 95% CI 1.44–33.9, p = 0.017), or both nongenital and ano-genital injuries (AOR 12.34, 95% CI 2.87–53.0, p = 0.001). DNA was not associated with case outcome. Conclusions This is the first study, to our knowledge, to show an association between documentation of ano-genital injuries, trials commencing, and convictions in rape cases in a developing country. Its findings are of particular importance because they show the value of good basic medical practices in documentation of injuries, rather than more expensive DNA evidence, in assisting courts in rape cases. Health care
References
[1]
Jewkes R, Sen P, Garcia Moreno C (2002) Sexual violence. In: Krug EG, Mercy J, Zwi A, Lozano R, editors. World Health Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. pp. 148–181.
[2]
Du Mont J, White D (2007) The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases: a global review. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
[3]
Wang SK, Rowley E (2008) Rape: responses from women and health providers. Geneva: Sexual Violence Research Initiative, World Health Organisation.
[4]
Wiley J, Sugar N, Fine D, \ Eckert LO (2003) Legal outcomes of sexual assault. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 1638–1641.
[5]
Lindsay SP (1998) An epidemiologic study of the influence of victim age and relationship to the suspect on the results of evidentiary examinations and law enforcement outcomes in cases of reported sexual assault [PhD dissertation]. San Diego: San Diego State University.
[6]
Rambow B, Adkinson C, Frost TH, Peterson GF (1992) Female sexual assault: medical and legal implications. Ann Emerg Med 21: 727–731.
[7]
Gray-Eurom K, Seaberg DC, Wears RL (2002) The prosecution of sexual assault cases: correlation with forensic evidence. Ann Emerg Med 39: 39–46.
[8]
McGregor MJ, Du Mont J, Myhr TL (2002) Sexual assault forensic medical examination: is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med 39: 639–647.
[9]
Jewkes R, Dunkle K, Koss MP, Levin J, Nduna M, et al. (2006) Rape perpetration by young, rural South African men: prevalence, patterns and risk factors. Soc Sci Med 63: 2949–61.
[10]
Department of Health (2005) National sexual assault policy. Pretoria: National Department of Health.
[11]
Department of Health (2004) National management guidelines for sexual assault care. Pretoria: National Department of Health.
[12]
Jina R, Jewkes R, Christofides N, Loots L, editors. (2008) Caring for survivors of sexual assault. A training programme for health care providers in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Health.
[13]
Biology Training Section (2000) Evidence collection kits: the new series of ECK for biological evidence. Pretoria: DNA Unit SAPS Forensic Science Laboratory.
[14]
Vetten L, Jewkes R, Fuller R, Christofides N (2008) Tracking justice: the attrition of rape cases through the criminal justice system in Gauteng. Johannesburg: Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre.
[15]
Gross SR, Jacoby K, Matheson DJ, Montgomery N, Patil S (2005) Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. J Crim Law Crim 95: 523–560.
[16]
Sidiropoulos E (1998) South Africa survey 1997/98. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
[17]
Blass L (2004) The responses of the criminal justice system to sexual violence crimes in the Kathorus region. South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre for Applied Legal Studies, University of the Witswatersrand.
[18]
Jina R (2006) Assessing the use of sexual assault evidence collection kits from six provinces in South Africa [unpublished MMed thesis]. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
[19]
Lovrich NP, Pratt TC, Gaffney MJ, Johnson CL, Asplen CH, et al. (2003) National forensic DNA study report. Pullman (Washington): Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University; Tacoma (Washington): Smith Alling Lane, P.S. Report No: 203970.
