全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于物理概化与深度学习耦合的葛洲坝水位预测模型
A Water-Level Prediction Model for Gezhouba Based on the Coupling of Physical Conceptualization and Deep Learning

DOI: 10.12677/jwrr.2026.154037, PP. 341-347

Keywords: 葛洲坝,坝前水位,物理概化,长短期记忆网络,发电耗水率,水量平衡
Gezhouba
, Forebay Water Level, Physical Conceptualization, Long Short-Term Memory, Generation Water-Consumption Rate, Water Balance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对葛洲坝等低水头、小库容径流式水电站日内发电调度中水位预测精度不足的问题,构建了物理概化模型与长短期记忆网络(LSTM)耦合的水位预测方法。河段传播采用时移与幅度修正概化,历史水量平衡用于反算耗水率样本,LSTM学习耗水率随运行状态变化的时序关系。预测时结合上游下泄、本站计划出力及泄流,按水量平衡递推计算坝前水位。依据2025年枯水期调峰出力线型,选取6个小幅调峰且日内出力计划调整幅度较小的典型日工况,与直接水位LSTM进行比较。耦合模型在4个工况中同时降低平均绝对误差(MAE)和均方根误差(RMSE),6个工况的平均MAE和RMSE分别由0.13 m、0.15 m降至0.07 m、0.08 m;平均日末绝对误差由0.27 m降至0.03 m。在小幅调峰、运行工况相对稳定的条件下,该方法可为径流式水电站日发电计划编制提供依据。
Water-level prediction accuracy remains insufficient for intraday generation scheduling at low-head run-of-river hydropower stations with limited storage capacity, such as Gezhouba. The proposed method couples a physics-based conceptual model with a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to predict water levels. A time shift and an amplitude adjustment represent flow propagation along the river reach. The method back-calculates samples of the generation water-consumption rate from historical water balances, and the LSTM learns how this rate varies with operating conditions over time. During prediction, water-balance calculations use upstream releases, the plant’s scheduled power output, and spill discharge to recursively determine the forebay water level. The evaluation compares the coupled model with a direct water-level LSTM model using six typical-day cases from the 2025 dry season. Case selection uses power-output profiles to identify days with modest daily peaking and small intraday revisions to the original power schedules. The coupled model reduces both mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) in four cases. Across all six cases, average MAE and RMSE decrease from 0.13 and 0.15 m to 0.07 and 0.08 m, respectively, and average end-of-day absolute error decreases from 0.27 to 0.03 m. The method can support the preparation of daily generation schedules for run-of-river hydropower stations under modest daily peaking and relatively stable operating conditions.

References

[1]  GUPTA, H. V., SOROOSHIAN, S. and YAPO, P. O. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1999, 4(2): 135-143.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
[2]  ORTH, R., STAUDINGER, M., SENEVIRATNE, S. I., et al. Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 523: 147-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.044
[3]  苟娇娇, 缪驰远, 徐宗学, 等. 大尺度水文模型参数不确定性分析的挑战与综合研究框架[J]. 水科学进展, 2022, 33(2): 327-335.
[4]  刘亚新, 樊启祥, 尚毅梓, 等. 基于LSTM神经网络的水电站短期水位预测方法[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2019, 39(2): 56-60.
[5]  汪涛, 徐杨, 曹辉, 等. 基于LSTM的三峡-葛洲坝梯级电站超短期水位预测[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(4): 80-86.
[6]  KRATZERT, F., KLOTZ, D., SHALEV, G., et al. Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2019, 23(12): 5089-5110.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019
[7]  陈冲, 朱啸宇, 王芳, 等. 物理引导的深度学习研究综述: 进展、挑战和展望[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2025, 19(2): 277-294.
[8]  孙明博, 闫宝伟, 常建波, 等. 基于物理机制和深度学习的混合模型及应用研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(8): 67-72, 80.
[9]  ZUBELZU, S., GHALKHA, A., BEN ISSAID, C., et al. Coupling machine learning and physical modelling for predicting runoff at catchment scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 354: 120404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120404
[10]  牛兰花, 张小峰, 李云中. 三峡电站调峰试验两坝间非恒定流原型观测分析[J]. 人民长江, 2006, 37(12): 24-27.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133