Quantum computing is a distinct field of computational science that uses principles from quantum mechanics to tackle problems that traditional computing struggles with in speed, size, and complexity. Classical cryptography relies on the complexity of mathematical problems such as large-number factorization, but quantum systems can solve them much faster. This threat necessitates the development and implementation of cryptographic methods resistant to attacks from both classical and quantum systems, known as Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). Strong cryptographic algorithms are crucial to counter vulnerabilities in pre-quantum systems. This paper reviews the challenges and solutions for securing communication amid advances in quantum computing. It stresses the urgent need to shift from classical cryptographic systems, which are susceptible to quantum threats, to PQC. The discussion includes theoretical frameworks and practical implementations, covering quantum principles, Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and standard PQC algorithms. Additionally, it briefly introduces Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) concepts, which enhance polynomial multiplication speed—an essential operation in PQC—by reducing computational complexity from
to
. The paper demonstrates the NTT/Inverse Number Theoretic Transform (INTT) hardware core in Python, focusing on its application to ML-KEM Polynomial arithmetic. Results indicate that NTT outperforms INTT in execution time and throughput. The paper concludes with an overview of security assumptions, cryptanalysis, and the current status of standardization.
References
[1]
Bavdekar, R., Chopde, E.J., Bhatia, A., Tiwari, K., et al. (2022) Post Quantum Cryptography: Techniques, Challenges, Standardization, and Directions for Future Research. arXiv: 2202.02826. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.02826
[2]
Panhwar, M.A., Khuhro, S.A., Mazhar, T., Deng, Z.L., et al. (2021) Quantum Cryptography: A Way of Improving Security of Information. International Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 16, 9-12.
[3]
Rubia, J., Babitha, R., Nithila, E., Shibi, S. and Rosi, A. (2024) A Survey about Post Quantum Cryptography Methods. EAIEndorsedTransactionsonInternetofThings, 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.5099
[4]
Bavdekar, R., Jayant Chopde, E., Agrawal, A., Bhatia, A. and Tiwari, K. (2023) Post Quantum Cryptography: A Review of Techniques, Challenges and Standardizations. 2023 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Bangkok, 11-14 January 2023, 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1109/icoin56518.2023.10048976
[5]
Nath, A., Maity, S., Banerjee, S. and Roy, R. (2024) Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) for Symmetric Key Transfer. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10, 270-280. https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit24103105
[6]
Sabani, M.E., Savvas, I.K., Poulakis, D., Garani, G. and Makris, G.C. (2023) Evaluation and Comparison of Lattice-Based Cryptosystems for a Secure Quantum Computing Era. Electronics, 12, Article 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12122643
[7]
Sabani, M., Savvas, I., Poulakis, D. and Makris, G. (2022) Quantum Key Distribution: Basic Protocols and Threats. Proceedings of the 26th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Athens, 25-27 November 2022, 383-388. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575879.3576022
[8]
Malpani, P., Kumar, S. and Pathak, A. (2024) Implementation of Coherent One Way Protocol for Quantum Key Distribution up to an Effective Distance of 145 km. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 56, Article No. 1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06934-2
[9]
Dam, D.T., Tran, T.H., Hoang, V.P., Pham, C.K. and Hoang, T.T. (2023) A Survey of Post-Quantum Cryptography: Start of a New Race. Cryptography, 7, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography7030040.
[10]
Alagic, G., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., et al. (2022) Status Report on the Third Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. NIST IR 8413-upd1. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[11]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2024) Module-Lattice-Based Key Encapsulation Mechanism Standard. NIST FIPS 203. U.S. Department of Commerce, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203
[12]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2024) Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard. NIST FIPS 204. U.S. Department of Commerce, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204
[13]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2024) Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard. NIST FIPS 205. U.S. Department of Commerce, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205
[14]
Alagic, G., Bfros, M., Ciadoux, P., et al. (2025) Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. NIST IR 8545. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8545
[15]
Li, S., Chen, Y., Chen, L., Liao, J., Kuang, C., Li, K., et al. (2023) Post-Quantum Security: Opportunities and Challenges. Sensors, 23, Article 8744. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218744
[16]
Pouly, A., Shen, Y. (2026) Solving the Shortest Vector Problem in Time on Random Lattices. In: Daemen, J. and Thomé, E., Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2026, Springer, 92-123.
[17]
Sabani, M.E., Savvas, I.K. and Garani, G. (2024) Learning with Errors: A Lattice-Based Keystone of Post-Quantum Cryptography. Signals, 5, 216-243. https://doi.org/10.3390/signals5020012
[18]
Chhetri, G., Somvanshi, S., Hebli, P., Brotee, S. and Das, S. (2025) Post-Quantum Cryptography and Quantum-Safe Security: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv: 2510.10436. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.10436
[19]
Sinha Roy, S. (2019) SaberX4: High-Throughput Software Implementation of Saber Key Encapsulation Mechanism. 2019 IEEE 37th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), Abu Dhabi, 17-20 November 2019, 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccd46524.2019.00050
[20]
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J. and Silverman, J.H. (1998) NTRU: A Ring-Based Public Key Cryptosystem. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 267-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0054868
[21]
Peng, K.X. and Du, S.Y. (2024) Falcon Anti-Quantum Attack Scheme Based on 8-Qubits Channel RSP, PREPRINT (Version 1). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5316539/v1
[22]
Srivastava, V., Baksi, A. and Debnath, S.K. (2023) An Overview of Hash Based Signatures. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive. https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/411
[23]
Paiva, T.B. and Terada, R. (2020) A Timing Attack on the HQC Encryption Scheme. In: LectureNotesinComputerScience, Springer, 551-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38471-5_22
[24]
Matthews, G.L. and McMillon, E. (2025) A Combinatorial Approach to Avoiding Weak Keys in the BIKE Cryptosystem. Designs,CodesandCryptography, 93, 3413-3436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-025-01643-7
[25]
Bernstein, D.J., Dobraunig, C., Schwabe, P., et al. (2017) SPHINCS+ Submission to the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Project. https://sphincs.org/data/sphincs%2B-specification.pdf
[26]
Hülsing, A. and Gazdag, S.L. (2015) Hash-Based Signatures: An Outline for a New Standard. NIST Workshop on Cybersecurity in a Post-Quantum World, Gaithersburg, 2-3 April 2015, 1-12.
[27]
Varnita, L.S.M.S., Subramanyam, K., Narasimha, T.P., Bhandari, H., et al. (2024) A Study on Isogeny Based Cryptography. 2024 International Conference on Electronics, Computing, Communication and Control Technology(ICECCC), Bengaluru, 2-3 May 2024, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceccc61767.2024.10593878
[28]
Seo, H., Anastasova, M., Jalali, A. and Azarderakhsh, R. (2021) Supersingular Isogeny Key Encapsulation (SIKE) Round 2 on ARM Cortex-M4. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 70, 1705-1718. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2020.3023045
[29]
Petzoldt, A. (2020) Efficient Key Generation for Rainbow. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44223-1_6
[30]
Beullens, W. (2021) Improved Cryptanalysis of UOV and Rainbow. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 348-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77870-5_13
[31]
Swayne, M. (2025) Quantum Computing Roadmaps: A Look at the Maps and Predictions of Major Players. The Quantum Insider. https://thequantuminsider.com/2025/05/16/quantum-computing-roadmaps-a-look-at-the-maps-and-predictions-of-major-quantum-players/
[32]
Chang, S.Y. and Khan, Q. (2026) Post-quantum Cryptography in Networking Protocols: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions. Cryptography, 10, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography10010012
[33]
Internet Pros Team (2026) Post-Quantum Cryptography: How PQC Is Protecting the Digital World from Quantum Threats in 2026. Internet Pros. https://internet-pros.com/blog/post-quantum-cryptography-pqc-2026/
[34]
Sonbul, O.S., Rashid, M. and Jaffar, A.Y. (2025) Accelerating Crystals-Kyber: High-Speed NTT Design with Optimized Pipelining and Modular Reduction. Electronics, 14, Article 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112122