全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Quantum Reinforcement Learning Framework for Multi-Rig Drilling Scheduling under Operational Constraints

DOI: 10.4236/jqis.2026.163015, PP. 425-448

Keywords: Quantum Reinforcement Learning, Variational Quantum Circuits, Deep Q-Network, Drilling Rig Scheduling, Combinatorial Optimization, Hybrid Quantum-Classical Machine Learning, Action Masking, Qiskit

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The purpose of this research is to show the capabilities that quantum computing has to offer for AI. Therefore, the scheduling problem was chosen in order to demonstrate and compare the classical reinforcement learning (CRL) agent with the quantum computing reinforcement learning (QC-RL) agent. This constrained combinatorial optimization problem involves scheduling an oil field with several drilling rigs which are limited in capacity, area limitations, mandatory maintenance periods, weather restrictions and a mobilization costs which is considered along with well priorities and deadlines. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) can learn adaptive scheduling policies, but value-based agents such as Deep Q-Networks (DQN) are known to exhibit high variance across random initializations. This paper investigates whether a hybrid quantum-classical value function can improve this reliability. We formulate realistic multi-rig drilling scheduling as a Markov Decision Process with action masking over an eight-constraint simulator (24 wells, 6 rigs, 3 areas, 80-day horizon) and compare a classical DQN against a hybrid Quantum DQN in which the value network’s core is a variational quantum circuit via a 4-qubit ZFeatureMap encoding followed by a RealAmplitudes ansatz with 12 trainable quantum parameters, executed using a PyTorch-Qiskit interface. Both agents share an identical training and evaluation protocol (3 seeds × 30 episodes, greedy evaluation) to ensure a controlled comparison. Under greedy evaluation, the hybrid Quantum DQN completes 22.3/24 wells on average versus 17/24 for the classical DQN, achieves an 12.87% higher mean reward (9.12M vs 8.08M), and most significantly reduces the across-seed reward standard deviation by roughly 6.8× (0.202M vs 1.38M). These results indicate that the structurally constrained quantum value function acts as an implicit regularizer, yielding scheduling policies that are markedly more consistent across initializations than a substantially larger classical network. This simulated quantum computing experiment demonstrates the potential for quantum computing in the field of AI.

References

[1]  Cárdenas Pantoja, N.J., Abdin, A., Baraldi, P., Pinciroli, L., Forello, A., Dovera, L., et al. (2025) Optimal Drilling Scheduling in Field Development Planning by Deep Reinforcement Learning. SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Galveston, 25-27 March 2025, SPE-223917-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2118/223917-ms
[2]  Chen, S.Y., Yang, C.H., Qi, J., Chen, P., Ma, X. and Goan, H. (2020) Variational Quantum Circuits for Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Access, 8, 141007-141024.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3010470
[3]  Lockwood, O. and Si, M. (2020) Reinforcement Learning with Quantum Variational Circuit. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 16, 245-251.
https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v16i1.7437
[4]  Santos, I.M., Hamacher, S. and Oliveira, F. (2021) A Systematic Literature Review for the Rig Scheduling Problem: Classification and State-of-the-Art. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 153, Article ID: 107443.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107443
[5]  Santos, I.M., Hamacher, S. and Oliveira, F. (2023) A Data-Driven Optimization Model for the Workover Rig Scheduling Problem: Case Study in an Oil Company. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 170, Article ID: 108088.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.108088
[6]  Achkar, V.G., Cafaro, V.G., Méndez, C.A. and Cafaro, D.C. (2019) Discrete-Time MILP Formulation for the Optimal Scheduling of Maintenance Tasks on Oil and Gas Production Assets. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58, 8231-8245.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00861
[7]  Ferna?ndez Pe?rez, M.A., Oliveira, F. and Hamacher, S. (2018) Optimizing Workover Rig Fleet Sizing and Scheduling Using Deterministic and Stochastic Programming Models. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57, 7544-7554.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04500
[8]  Lamas, L.F., Botechia, V.E., Schiozer, D.J. and Delshad, M. (2017) Optimization for Drilling Schedule of Wells in the Development of Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas, 11, 165-173.
https://doi.org/10.5419/bjpg2017-0014
[9]  Nooruddin, H., Zahrani, A., Shahri, M. and Alsousy, A. (2022) Automatic Generation of Drilling Schedules Using Machine Learning: A Paradigm Shift in Planning and Resource Allocation. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Riyadh, 21-23 February 2022, IPTC-22147-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22147-ms
[10]  Muhammad, R.B., Alyaev, S. and Bratvold, R.B. (2026) Optimal Sequential Decision-Making in Geosteering: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 258, Article ID: 214304.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214304
[11]  Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A.A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M.G., et al. (2015) Human-Level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature, 518, 529-533.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236
[12]  Lockwood, O. and Si, M. (2021) Playing Atari with Hybrid Quantum-Classical Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 2107.04114.
http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04114
[13]  Skolik, A., Jerbi, S. and Dunjko, V. (2022) Quantum Agents in the Gym: A Variational Quantum Algorithm for Deep Q-Learning. Quantum, 6, 720.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-05-24-720
[14]  Jerbi, S., Gyurik, C., Marshall, S.C., Briegel, H.J. and Dunjko, V. (2021) Parametrized Quantum Policies for Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 2103.05577.
http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05577
[15]  Yu, L., Yu, W., Chen, Y. and Zhang, C. (2026) QCNN-Inspired Variational Circuits for Enhanced Noise Robustness in Quantum Deep Q-Learning. Information, 17, Article 250.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030250
[16]  Larocca, M., Thanasilp, S., Wang, S., Sharma, K., Biamonte, J., Coles, P.J., et al. (2025) Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computing. Nature Reviews Physics, 7, 174-189.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-025-00813-9
[17]  Holmes, Z., Sharma, K., Cerezo, M. and Coles, P.J. (2022) Connecting Ansatz Expressibility to Gradient Magnitudes and Barren Plateaus. PRX Quantum, 3, Article ID: 010313.
https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.3.010313
[18]  Caro, M.C., Huang, H., Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Sornborger, A., Cincio, L., et al. (2022) Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning from Few Training Data. Nature Communications, 13, Article No. 4919.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32550-3
[19]  Javadi-Abhari, A., et al. (2024) Quantum Computing with Qiskit. arXiv: 2405.08810.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133