The purpose of this research is to show the capabilities that quantum computing has to offer for AI. Therefore, the scheduling problem was chosen in order to demonstrate and compare the classical reinforcement learning (CRL) agent with the quantum computing reinforcement learning (QC-RL) agent. This constrained combinatorial optimization problem involves scheduling an oil field with several drilling rigs which are limited in capacity, area limitations, mandatory maintenance periods, weather restrictions and a mobilization costs which is considered along with well priorities and deadlines. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) can learn adaptive scheduling policies, but value-based agents such as Deep Q-Networks (DQN) are known to exhibit high variance across random initializations. This paper investigates whether a hybrid quantum-classical value function can improve this reliability. We formulate realistic multi-rig drilling scheduling as a Markov Decision Process with action masking over an eight-constraint simulator (24 wells, 6 rigs, 3 areas, 80-day horizon) and compare a classical DQN against a hybrid Quantum DQN in which the value network’s core is a variational quantum circuit via a 4-qubit ZFeatureMap encoding followed by a RealAmplitudes ansatz with 12 trainable quantum parameters, executed using a PyTorch-Qiskit interface. Both agents share an identical training and evaluation protocol (3 seeds × 30 episodes, greedy evaluation) to ensure a controlled comparison. Under greedy evaluation, the hybrid Quantum DQN completes 22.3/24 wells on average versus 17/24 for the classical DQN, achieves an 12.87% higher mean reward (9.12M vs 8.08M), and most significantly reduces the across-seed reward standard deviation by roughly 6.8× (0.202M vs 1.38M). These results indicate that the structurally constrained quantum value function acts as an implicit regularizer, yielding scheduling policies that are markedly more consistent across initializations than a substantially larger classical network. This simulated quantum computing experiment demonstrates the potential for quantum computing in the field of AI.
References
[1]
Cárdenas Pantoja, N.J., Abdin, A., Baraldi, P., Pinciroli, L., Forello, A., Dovera, L., et al. (2025) Optimal Drilling Scheduling in Field Development Planning by Deep Reinforcement Learning. SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Galveston, 25-27 March 2025, SPE-223917-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/223917-ms
[2]
Chen, S.Y., Yang, C.H., Qi, J., Chen, P., Ma, X. and Goan, H. (2020) Variational Quantum Circuits for Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEEAccess, 8, 141007-141024. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3010470
[3]
Lockwood, O. and Si, M. (2020) Reinforcement Learning with Quantum Variational Circuit. ProceedingsoftheAAAIConferenceonArtificialIntelligenceandInteractiveDigitalEntertainment, 16, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v16i1.7437
[4]
Santos, I.M., Hamacher, S. and Oliveira, F. (2021) A Systematic Literature Review for the Rig Scheduling Problem: Classification and State-of-the-Art. Computers&ChemicalEngineering, 153, Article ID: 107443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107443
[5]
Santos, I.M., Hamacher, S. and Oliveira, F. (2023) A Data-Driven Optimization Model for the Workover Rig Scheduling Problem: Case Study in an Oil Company. Computers&ChemicalEngineering, 170, Article ID: 108088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.108088
[6]
Achkar, V.G., Cafaro, V.G., Méndez, C.A. and Cafaro, D.C. (2019) Discrete-Time MILP Formulation for the Optimal Scheduling of Maintenance Tasks on Oil and Gas Production Assets. Industrial&EngineeringChemistryResearch, 58, 8231-8245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00861
[7]
Ferna?ndez Pe?rez, M.A., Oliveira, F. and Hamacher, S. (2018) Optimizing Workover Rig Fleet Sizing and Scheduling Using Deterministic and Stochastic Programming Models. Industrial&EngineeringChemistryResearch, 57, 7544-7554. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04500
[8]
Lamas, L.F., Botechia, V.E., Schiozer, D.J. and Delshad, M. (2017) Optimization for Drilling Schedule of Wells in the Development of Heavy Oil Reservoirs. BrazilianJournalofPetroleumandGas, 11, 165-173. https://doi.org/10.5419/bjpg2017-0014
[9]
Nooruddin, H., Zahrani, A., Shahri, M. and Alsousy, A. (2022) Automatic Generation of Drilling Schedules Using Machine Learning: A Paradigm Shift in Planning and Resource Allocation. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Riyadh, 21-23 February 2022, IPTC-22147-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22147-ms
[10]
Muhammad, R.B., Alyaev, S. and Bratvold, R.B. (2026) Optimal Sequential Decision-Making in Geosteering: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. GeoenergyScienceandEngineering, 258, Article ID: 214304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214304
[11]
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A.A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M.G., et al. (2015) Human-Level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature, 518, 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236
[12]
Lockwood, O. and Si, M. (2021) Playing Atari with Hybrid Quantum-Classical Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 2107.04114. http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04114
[13]
Skolik, A., Jerbi, S. and Dunjko, V. (2022) Quantum Agents in the Gym: A Variational Quantum Algorithm for Deep Q-Learning. Quantum, 6, 720. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-05-24-720
[14]
Jerbi, S., Gyurik, C., Marshall, S.C., Briegel, H.J. and Dunjko, V. (2021) Parametrized Quantum Policies for Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 2103.05577. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05577
[15]
Yu, L., Yu, W., Chen, Y. and Zhang, C. (2026) QCNN-Inspired Variational Circuits for Enhanced Noise Robustness in Quantum Deep Q-Learning. Information, 17, Article 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030250
[16]
Larocca, M., Thanasilp, S., Wang, S., Sharma, K., Biamonte, J., Coles, P.J., et al. (2025) Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computing. NatureReviewsPhysics, 7, 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-025-00813-9
[17]
Holmes, Z., Sharma, K., Cerezo, M. and Coles, P.J. (2022) Connecting Ansatz Expressibility to Gradient Magnitudes and Barren Plateaus. PRXQuantum, 3, Article ID: 010313. https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.3.010313
[18]
Caro, M.C., Huang, H., Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Sornborger, A., Cincio, L., et al. (2022) Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning from Few Training Data. NatureCommunications, 13, Article No. 4919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32550-3
[19]
Javadi-Abhari, A., et al. (2024) Quantum Computing with Qiskit. arXiv: 2405.08810.