Resource constraints persistently threaten the fulfilment of social missions in social entrepreneurship. While prior work acknowledges bricolage as a useful response, the literature has largely remained at the individual level of analysis, overlooking the collective dynamics and knowledge integration inherent in multi-actor collaboration. Drawing on a knowledge perspective and employing a multiple-case study design, we investigate how three social entrepreneurial organizations—CanYou Group, Buy42, and Big Fish Community—address resource shortages through collective bricolage. Our findings show that collective bricolage unfolds as a dynamic process of four stages—demand trigger, resource mobilization, negotiation and dialogue, and collaborative co?creation—that move forward while also looping back on themselves. Knowledge flows permeate the entire process, successively manifesting as problem?frame construction, knowledge aggregation, cross?actor interpretation, and the emergence of novel solutions. What sets collective bricolage apart from its individual counterpart is precisely the multi?actor negotiation over knowledge and rules, with the degree of rule formalization varying continuously with the heterogeneity of the actors involved. This study extends bricolage theory beyond individual resource recombination towards collective knowledge construction, and offers actionable implications for social entrepreneurial organizations seeking to identify, mobilize, and integrate dispersed knowledge.
References
[1]
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? EntrepreneurshipTheoryandPractice,30, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
[2]
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,50, 329-366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
[3]
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
[4]
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. OrganizationScience,2, 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
[5]
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries. OrganizationScience,15, 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
[6]
Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming Resource Constraints in Global Social Entrepreneurship. StrategicEntrepreneurshipJournal,7, 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1150
[7]
Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x
[8]
Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C. (2010). Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory. OrganizationStudies,31, 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051
[9]
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532?550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
[10]
Garud, R., & Karn?e, P. (2003). Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship. ResearchPolicy,32, 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00100-2
[11]
Kwong, C., Tasavori, M., & Cheung, C. W. (2017). Bricolage, Collaboration and Mission Drift in Social Enterprises. Entrepreneurship&RegionalDevelopment,29, 609-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1328904
[12]
Liu, Z. Y., & Chen, Y. C. (2021). Social Enterprise’ Hybrid Logic and Cross-Sectoral Collaboration. Academic Monthly,53, 85-98. (In Chinese)
[13]
Maalaoui, A., Séverine, L. L. L., & Razgallah, M. (2020). Does Knowledge Management Explain the Poor Growth of Social Enterprises? Key Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Knowledge Management and Social Entrepreneurship. JournalofKnowledgeManagement,24, 1513-1532. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0603
[14]
Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight. JournalofWorldBusiness,41, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
[15]
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[16]
Papazu, I. (2021). Entrepreneurial Resource Construction through Collective Bricolage on Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island: An Ethnographic Study. Entrepreneurship&RegionalDevelopment,33, 837-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1964613
[17]
Peng, W., Zheng, Q., Tang, K. et al. (2019). Study on the Driving Mechanism of Social Ventures’ Resource Bricolage: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. South China Journal of Economics, No.10, 90-101. (In Chinese)
[18]
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[19]
Su, J. Q., & Liu, J. (2013). Is Secondary Data Reliable? An Explanation Based on Normative Case Study. Chinese Journal of Management, 10, 1405-1409+1418. (In Chinese)
[20]
Wei, T., & Wan, Q. (2023). Resource Bricolage through Social Capital: How a Government-Induced Social Startup Sustains Dual Value Creation after Government Sponsorship. Management World, 39, 100-119. (In Chinese)
[21]
Weick, K. E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,38, 628-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339
[22]
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
[23]
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[24]
Zhang, W. G., & Mai, Y. Y. (2026). Holding the Great Image, All Under Heaven Will Follow: Research on the Construction Mechanism of Platform-Based Business Model of Cooperatives from the Perspective of Social Bricolage. Journal of Management Case Studies,19, 62-74. (In Chinese)