Urban service inequality and intra-urban spatial heterogeneity have become major challenges for sustainable urban development. However, existing studies often rely on administrative-scale statistics or aggregated indicators, which fail to capture fine-scale spatial disparities in urban service distribution. To address this limitation, this study proposes a grid-based spatial diagnostic framework using multi-source Point of Interest (POI) data. A 1 km × 1 km grid system is employed to characterize the spatial distribution of six categories of urban services through service intensity and accessibility indicators, enabling fine-scale identification of spatial inequality patterns. The results reveal significant inter-city differences in urban service organization. Changchun exhibits a relatively balanced polycentric structure with more evenly distributed urban services, whereas Hohhot demonstrates a more centralized monocentric pattern characterized by pronounced deficiencies in accommodation and lifestyle-related services. Both cities exhibit persistent core-periphery disparities, with service accessibility declining significantly toward peripheral areas. The proposed framework provides a transferable and spatially explicit approach for diagnosing urban service inequality, offering methodological support for fine-scale urban planning, infrastructure optimization, and evidence-based governance.
References
[1]
Wang, Y., Chen, H., Long, R., Wang, L., Yang, M. and Sun, Q. (2023) How Does Population Aging Affect Urban Green Transition Development in China? An Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Econometric Model. EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview, 99, Article 107027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107027
[2]
Wang, H., Peng, G. and Du, H. (2024) Digital Economy Development Boosts Urban Resilience—Evidence from China. ScientificReports, 14, Article No. 2925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52191-4
[3]
Ngossaha, J.M., Ngouna, R.H., Archimède, B., Negulescu, M. and Petri?or, A. (2024) Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Multidimensional Ontology-Based Framework for Assessment and Consensus Decision-Making Using DS-AHP. Sustainability, 16, Article 4458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114458
[4]
Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Luo, S., Sun, Z. and Qu, W. (2017) Human-Scale Sustainability Assessment of Urban Intersections Based Upon Multi-Source Big Data. Sustainability, 9, Article 1148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071148
[5]
He, Q., He, W., Song, Y., Wu, J., Yin, C. and Mou, Y. (2018) The Impact of Urban Growth Patterns on Urban Vitality in Newly Built-Up Areas Based on an Association Rules Analysis Using Geographical ‘Big Data’. LandUsePolicy, 78, 726-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.020
[6]
Yang, B., Xu, T. and Shi, L. (2017) Analysis on Sustainable Urban Development Levels and Trends in China’s Cities. JournalofCleanerProduction, 141, 868-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.121
[7]
Zhang, X., Sun, L., Shao, Z. and Zhou, X. (2023) Accessibility Evaluation of Public Service Facilities in Villages and Towns Based on POI Data: A Case Study of Suining County, Xuzhou, China. JournalofUrbanPlanningandDevelopment, 149, Article 05023019. https://doi.org/10.1061/jupddm.upeng-4222
[8]
Ding, L., Shao, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, C. and Wu, D. (2016) A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method. Sustainability, 8, Article 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080746
[9]
Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A. (2011) Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. ExpertSystemswithApplications, 38, 14336-14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
[10]
Wu, D., Yang, Z., Wang, N., Li, C. and Yang, Y. (2018) An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units. Sustainability, 10, Article 1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061700
[11]
Bautista-Puig, N., Benayas, J., Ma?ana-Rodríguez, J., Suárez, M. and Sanz-Casado, E. (2022) The Role of Urban Resilience in Research and Its Contribution to Sustainability. Cities, 126, Article 103715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715
[12]
Zeng, X., Yu, Y., Yang, S., Lv, Y. and Sarker, M.N.I. (2022) Urban Resilience for Urban Sustainability: Concepts, Dimensions, and Perspectives. Sustainability, 14, Article 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052481
[13]
Xun, X. and Yuan, Y. (2020) Research on the Urban Resilience Evaluation with Hybrid Multiple Attribute TOPSIS Method: An Example in China. NaturalHazards, 103, 557-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
[14]
Huang, Z. and Feng, C. (2025) Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Storm Flooding Resilience by Integrating AHP-Entropy Weight Method and Cloud Model. Water, 17, Article 2576. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172576
[15]
Miao, C., Na, M., Chen, H. and Ding, M. (2025) Urban Resilience Evaluation Based on Entropy-TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of County-Level Cities in Ningxia, Northwest China. InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalScienceandTechnology, 22, 4187-4202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05880-6