全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Diagnosing Urban Service Inequality through Grid-Based Spatial Analysis of Multi-Source POI Data: Evidence from Changchun and Hohhot, China

DOI: 10.4236/ojs.2026.164015, PP. 328-341

Keywords: Urban Service Inequality, Spatial Heterogeneity, Grid-Based Analysis, Point of Interest (POI), Spatial Diagnostic Framework

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Urban service inequality and intra-urban spatial heterogeneity have become major challenges for sustainable urban development. However, existing studies often rely on administrative-scale statistics or aggregated indicators, which fail to capture fine-scale spatial disparities in urban service distribution. To address this limitation, this study proposes a grid-based spatial diagnostic framework using multi-source Point of Interest (POI) data. A 1 km × 1 km grid system is employed to characterize the spatial distribution of six categories of urban services through service intensity and accessibility indicators, enabling fine-scale identification of spatial inequality patterns. The results reveal significant inter-city differences in urban service organization. Changchun exhibits a relatively balanced polycentric structure with more evenly distributed urban services, whereas Hohhot demonstrates a more centralized monocentric pattern characterized by pronounced deficiencies in accommodation and lifestyle-related services. Both cities exhibit persistent core-periphery disparities, with service accessibility declining significantly toward peripheral areas. The proposed framework provides a transferable and spatially explicit approach for diagnosing urban service inequality, offering methodological support for fine-scale urban planning, infrastructure optimization, and evidence-based governance.

References

[1]  Wang, Y., Chen, H., Long, R., Wang, L., Yang, M. and Sun, Q. (2023) How Does Population Aging Affect Urban Green Transition Development in China? An Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Econometric Model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99, Article 107027.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107027
[2]  Wang, H., Peng, G. and Du, H. (2024) Digital Economy Development Boosts Urban Resilience—Evidence from China. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 2925.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52191-4
[3]  Ngossaha, J.M., Ngouna, R.H., Archimède, B., Negulescu, M. and Petri?or, A. (2024) Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Multidimensional Ontology-Based Framework for Assessment and Consensus Decision-Making Using DS-AHP. Sustainability, 16, Article 4458.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114458
[4]  Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Luo, S., Sun, Z. and Qu, W. (2017) Human-Scale Sustainability Assessment of Urban Intersections Based Upon Multi-Source Big Data. Sustainability, 9, Article 1148.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071148
[5]  He, Q., He, W., Song, Y., Wu, J., Yin, C. and Mou, Y. (2018) The Impact of Urban Growth Patterns on Urban Vitality in Newly Built-Up Areas Based on an Association Rules Analysis Using Geographical ‘Big Data’. Land Use Policy, 78, 726-738.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.020
[6]  Yang, B., Xu, T. and Shi, L. (2017) Analysis on Sustainable Urban Development Levels and Trends in China’s Cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 868-880.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.121
[7]  Zhang, X., Sun, L., Shao, Z. and Zhou, X. (2023) Accessibility Evaluation of Public Service Facilities in Villages and Towns Based on POI Data: A Case Study of Suining County, Xuzhou, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 149, Article 05023019.
https://doi.org/10.1061/jupddm.upeng-4222
[8]  Ding, L., Shao, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, C. and Wu, D. (2016) A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method. Sustainability, 8, Article 746.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080746
[9]  Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A. (2011) Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14336-14345.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
[10]  Wu, D., Yang, Z., Wang, N., Li, C. and Yang, Y. (2018) An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units. Sustainability, 10, Article 1700.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061700
[11]  Bautista-Puig, N., Benayas, J., Ma?ana-Rodríguez, J., Suárez, M. and Sanz-Casado, E. (2022) The Role of Urban Resilience in Research and Its Contribution to Sustainability. Cities, 126, Article 103715.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715
[12]  Zeng, X., Yu, Y., Yang, S., Lv, Y. and Sarker, M.N.I. (2022) Urban Resilience for Urban Sustainability: Concepts, Dimensions, and Perspectives. Sustainability, 14, Article 2481.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052481
[13]  Xun, X. and Yuan, Y. (2020) Research on the Urban Resilience Evaluation with Hybrid Multiple Attribute TOPSIS Method: An Example in China. Natural Hazards, 103, 557-577.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
[14]  Huang, Z. and Feng, C. (2025) Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Storm Flooding Resilience by Integrating AHP-Entropy Weight Method and Cloud Model. Water, 17, Article 2576.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172576
[15]  Miao, C., Na, M., Chen, H. and Ding, M. (2025) Urban Resilience Evaluation Based on Entropy-TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of County-Level Cities in Ningxia, Northwest China. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22, 4187-4202.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05880-6

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133