Artificial intelligence is transforming how organizations manage, retrieve, interpret, and apply knowledge for business performance. While knowledge management has traditionally focused on knowledge capture, repositories, lessons learned, communities of practice, expertise sharing, and organizational learning, many organizations continue to experience fragmented knowledge assets, inconsistent reuse, weak metadata, limited expertise visibility, and poor feedback loops between knowledge creation and business application. These limitations affect proposal development, project execution, onboarding, innovation, operational decision-making, quality management, and organizational responsiveness. This conceptual article proposes an AI-Enabled Knowledge Intelligence Framework for improving business decision support, organizational learning, and knowledge-based performance. Drawing on the knowledge-based view of the firm, intellectual capital theory, dynamic capabilities, organizational learning, business intelligence, management information systems, and knowledge governance, the article positions artificial intelligence as an augmentation layer within a broader business management system. The framework includes six interdependent dimensions: knowledge sources, knowledge structuring, AI augmentation, human validation and sensemaking, knowledge application, and learning feedback. The article argues that AI-enabled knowledge management should not be treated as a technology implementation alone, but as a managerial capability that integrates people, processes, governance, information systems, and performance measurement. Research propositions and managerial implications are provided to support future empirical study and practical adoption in business and industrial management contexts.
References
[1]
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues 1, 2. MISQuarterly,25, 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
[2]
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
[3]
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures and Models. ManagementDecision,36, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142
[4]
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. MISQuarterly,1, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/248710
[5]
Choo, C. W. (1998). The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. TheAcademyofManagementReview,24, 522-537. https://doi.org/10.2307/259140
[7]
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.
[8]
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K. et al. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
[9]
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and Organizing in the Age of the Learning Algorithm. InformationandOrganization,28, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
[10]
Foss, N. J. (2007). The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics. Organization,14, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071859
[11]
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge‐Based Theory of the Firm. StrategicManagementJournal,17, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
[12]
International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 30401:2018 Knowledge Management Systems: Requirements. https://www.iso.org/standard/68683.html
[13]
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making. Business Horizons, 61, 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
[14]
Lebovitz, S., Levina, N., & Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2021). Is AI Ground Truth Really True? The Dangers of Training and Evaluating AI Tools Based on Experts’ Know-What. MISQuarterly,45, 1501-1526. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2021/16564
[15]
Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 57-93.
[16]
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. TheAcademyofManagementReview,23, 242-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
[17]
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
[18]
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. LongRangePlanning,33, 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00115-6
[19]
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox. AcademyofManagementReview,46, 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
[20]
Spender, J. C. (1996). Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm. StrategicManagementJournal,17, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171106
[21]
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. StrategicManagementJournal,28, 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[22]
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. StrategicManagementJournal,18, 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
[23]
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803932