全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Household-Level Determinants of Low-Carbon Cooking Technology Adoption in Rural Sierra Leone: Evidence from Bombali, Port Loko and Tonkolili

DOI: 10.4236/ojee.2026.153004, PP. 70-80

Keywords: Clean Cooking, Low-Carbon Technology, Rural Households, Technology Adoption, Sierra Leone, Linear Probability Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study examined the household-level factors associated with the adoption of low-carbon cooking technologies using cross-sectional survey data from 600 households in Bombali, Port Loko and Tonkolili districts. Adoption was defined as the use of at least one improved biomass stove, liquefied petroleum gas, biogas, ethanol or electric cooking technology, while households relying exclusively on traditional three-stone fires or unimproved stoves were classified as non-adopters. The analysis employed descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Welch mean-difference tests and a heteroskedasticity-robust linear probability model. The findings show that 38.0% of households had adopted at least one low-carbon cooking technology. Adoption rates were 39.2% in Bombali, 38.5% in Port Loko and 36.2% in Tonkolili, with no statistically significant differences across districts, χ2(2) = 0.41, p = 0.817. Household income, education, household size, female household headship, awareness, access to credit, stove cost, fuel price and market distance were not statistically significant predictors of adoption in the multivariable model. The model explained only 0.3% of the variation in adoption, suggesting that the measured household-level characteristics provided limited explanatory power. The findings indicate that low-carbon cooking adoption may be shaped more strongly by wider structural and institutional conditions, including technology availability, rural supply systems, distribution networks, programme design and maintenance support.

References

[1]  World Health Organization (2025) Household Air Pollution. World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health
[2]  International Energy Agency (n.d.) Access to Clean Cooking. International Energy Agency.
https://www.iea.org/reports/sdg7-data-and-projections/access-to-clean-cooking
[3]  World Bank (2025) Access to Clean Fuels and Technologies for Cooking (% of Population)—Sierra Leone. World Development Indicators.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.CFT.ACCS.ZS?locations=SL
[4]  World Bank (2020) The State of Access to Modern Energy Cooking Services. World Bank.
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/3b07067d-bd68-59fa-b1aa-1db2f4de9f07
[5]  Jeuland, M.A. and Pattanayak, S.K. (2012) Benefits and Costs of Improved Cookstoves: Assessing the Implications of Variability in Health, Forest and Climate Impacts. PLOS ONE, 7, e30338.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030338
[6]  ENERGIA (2019) Gender in the Transition to Sustainable Energy for All: From Evidence to Inclusive Policies. ENERGIA International Network on Gender and Sustainable Energy, The Hague.
https://energia.org/assets/2019/04/Gender-in-the-transition-to-sustainable-energy-for-all_-From-evidence-to-inclusive-policies_FINAL.pdf
[7]  Masera, O.R., Saatkamp, B.D. and Kammen, D.M. (2000) From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model. World Development, 28, 2083-2103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00076-0
[8]  Heltberg, R. (2004) Fuel Switching: Evidence from Eight Developing Countries. Energy Economics, 26, 869-887.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.018
[9]  United Nations General Assembly (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations.
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[10]  Pachauri, S. and Jiang, L. (2008) The Household Energy Transition in India and China. Energy Policy, 36, 4022-4035.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.016
[11]  Lewis, J.J. and Pattanayak, S.K. (2012) Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120, 637-645.
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104194
[12]  Jan, I. (2012) What Makes People Adopt Improved Cookstoves? Empirical Evidence from Rural Northwest Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3200-3205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.038
[13]  Hosier, R.H. and Dowd, J. (1987) Household Fuel Choice in Zimbabwe: An Empirical Test of the Energy Ladder Hypothesis. Resources and Energy, 9, 347-361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(87)90003-x
[14]  Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition, Free Press.
[15]  Karimu, A., Mensah, J.T. and Adu, G. (2016) Who Adopts LPG as the Main Cooking Fuel and Why? Empirical Evidence on Ghana Based on National Survey. World Development, 85, 43-57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.004
[16]  Bryman, A. (2016) Social Research Methods. 5th Edition, Oxford University Press.
[17]  Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th Edition, Sage Publications.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133