全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Therapeutic Effects of a Short-Term Inpatient Functional Electrical Stimulation Protocol on Gait and Balance in a Heterogeneous Neurological Population

DOI: 10.4236/ojtr.2026.143015, PP. 175-187

Keywords: Functional Electrical Stimulation, Foot Drop, Neurological Rehabilitation, Gait Velocity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Neurological patients presenting with foot drop suffer from profound mobility restrictions that severely impair daily activities, independence, and community reintegration. Traditional rehabilitation often overlooks the biomechanical quality of gait, leading to suboptimal compensatory strategies. Therefore, effective interventions must focus on enhancing walking speed and endurance while preserving gait quality and minimising pathological compensations. Methods: This facility-based pilot study involved a heterogeneous cohort of 18 hospitalised neurological patients with unilateral foot drop. The intervention consisted of 6 to 8 sessions of overground walking with a Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) applied at a frequency of 2 to 3 times per week as an adjunct to standard intensive daily physiotherapy. Functional mobility was assessed at baseline and post-treatment (with FES turned off) using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the 10-Meter Walk Test (10 MWT) at preferred and fast speeds. Changes were benchmarked against established Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) thresholds. Results: Post-treatment assessments revealed statistically significant improvements across all parameters (p < 0.001) with exceptionally large effect sizes. Submaximal walking endurance (6 MWT) improved by 62.16%, while dynamic balance (TUG) and gait velocities (10 MWT) improved by more than 30%. Clinical relevance was highlighted by substantial MCID responder rates ranging from 78% to 94% across all tested domains. Conclusions: Integrating a short-term, low-frequency FES protocol into standard inpatient rehabilitation significantly enhances both objective statistical and clinical gait parameters. Beyond biomechanical recovery, this scalable intervention facilitates greater autonomy, restores self-confidence, and supports successful community reintegration in mixed neurological populations.

References

[1]  Downing, A., Van Ryn, D., Fecko, A., Aiken, C., McGowan, S., Sawers, S., et al. (2014) Effect of a 2-Week Trial of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Gait Function and Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care, 16, 146-152.
https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2013-032
[2]  Bosch, P.R., Harris, J.E. and Wing, K. (2014) Review of Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation for Dorsiflexion Assist and Orthotic Substitution from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Movement Interventions Subcommittee. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 390-396.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.017
[3]  Wojnar, R. (2025) Evaluating Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients: Neurostimulation-Assisted Walking Device in Stroke Patients with Drop Foot. Journal of Clinical Research and Medicine, 8, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.31038/JCRM.2025834
[4]  Luengo-Fernandez, R., Candio, P., Violato, M. and Leal, J. (2020) At What Cost: The Economic Impact of Stroke in Europe. Stroke Alliance for Europe.
[5]  O’Dell, M.W., Dunning, K., Kluding, P., Wu, S.S., Feld, J., Ginosian, J., et al. (2014) Response and Prediction of Improvement in Gait Speed from Functional Electrical Stimulation in Persons with Poststroke Drop Foot. PM&R, 6, 587-601.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.01.001
[6]  Matsumoto, S., Shimodozono, M., Noma, T., Miyara, K., Onoda, T., Ijichi, R., et al. (2023) Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, Article 2638.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072638
[7]  Jaqueline da Cunha, M., Rech, K.D., Salazar, A.P. and Pagnussat, A.S. (2021) Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Peroneal Nerve Improves Post-Stroke Gait Speed When Combined with Physiotherapy. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 64, Article ID: 101388.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.012
[8]  Güzel, ?., Karaca Umay, E., ?ztürk, E.A. and ?akci, A. (2022) The Efficiency of Functional Electrical Stimulation and Balance-Weighted Rehabilitation Therapy in Stroke Patients with Foot-Drop: A Pilot Study. Fiziksel T?p ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi, 25, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.31609/jpmrs.2021-82149
[9]  Sheffler, L.R. and Chae, J. (2015) Hemiparetic Gait. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 26, 611-623.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.006
[10]  Kluding, P.M., Dunning, K., O’Dell, M.W., Wu, S.S., Ginosian, J., Feld, J., et al. (2013) Foot Drop Stimulation versus Ankle Foot Orthosis after Stroke: 30-Week Outcomes. Stroke, 44, 1660-1669.
https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.000334
[11]  Barr, C.J., Patritti, B.L., Bowes, R., Crotty, M. and McLoughlin, J.V. (2017) Orthotic and Therapeutic Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Fatigue Induced Gait Patterns in People with Multiple Sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12, 560-572.
https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1136702
[12]  ?ulcová, D. (2016) Comparison of Electrostimulation Systems WalkAide? and NESS L300? in Therapy of Foot Drop in Patients after Stroke. Bachelor’s Thesis, Charles University in Prague.
[13]  Tache-Codreanu, D., Rotaru, I.A., Butum-Cristea, M., Stefan, G., Tache-Codreanu, A., Sporea, C., et al. (2026) Short-Term Facility-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation for Chronic Post-Stroke Foot Drop: A Pilot Study. Bioengineering, 13, Article 238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020238
[14]  Street, T., Taylor, P. and Swain, I. (2015) Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Walking Speed, Functional Walking Category, and Clinically Meaningful Changes for People with Multiple Sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 667-672.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.017
[15]  Shin, H.E., Kim, M., Lee, D., Jang, J.Y., Soh, Y., Yun, D.H., et al. (2022) Therapeutic Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Physical Performance and Muscle Strength in Post-Stroke Older Adults: A Review. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 26, 16-24.
https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.22.0006
[16]  Renfrew, L.M., Paul, L., McFadyen, A., Rafferty, D., Moseley, O., Lord, A.C., et al. (2019) The Clinical-and Cost-Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation and Ankle-Foot Orthoses for Foot Drop in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicentre Randomized Trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33, 1150-1162.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519842254
[17]  Kúrová, D. and Sajdl, L. (2026) Home-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation across Different Levels of Mobility in Neurological Patients: A Case Series. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Neurology, 4, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.61440/jcpn.2026.v4.75
[18]  ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories (2002) ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 111-117.
https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
[19]  Podsiadlo, D. and Richardson, S. (1991) The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39, 142-148.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
[20]  Collen, F.M., Wade, D.T. and Bradshaw, C.M. (1990) Mobility after Stroke: Reliability of Measures of Impairment and Disability. International Disability Studies, 12, 6-9.
https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799009166594
[21]  Oosterveer, D.M., van den Berg, C., Volker, G., Wouda, N.C., Terluin, B. and Hoitsma, E. (2022) Determining the Minimal Important Change of the 6-Minute Walking Test in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using a Predictive Modelling Anchor-Based Method. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 57, Article ID: 103438.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.103438
[22]  Lexell, J., Flansbjer, U., Holmb?ck, A.M., Downham, D. and Patten, C. (2005) Reliability of Gait Performance Tests in Men and Women with Hemiparesis after Stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 75-82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410017215
[23]  Perera, S., Mody, S.H., Woodman, R.C. and Studenski, S.A. (2006) Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54, 743-749.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x
[24]  An, S., Lee, Y., Shin, H. and Lee, G. (2015) Gait Velocity and Walking Distance to Predict Community Walking after Stroke. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17, 533-538.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12234
[25]  Thrane, G., Joakimsen, R.M. and Thornquist, E. (2007) The Association between Timed up and Go Test and History of Falls: The Troms? Study. BMC Geriatrics, 7, Article No. 1.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-1
[26]  Zeiler, S.R. and Krakauer, J.W. (2013) The Interaction between Training and Plasticity in the Poststroke Brain. Current Opinion in Neurology, 26, 609-616.
https://doi.org/10.1097/wco.0000000000000025

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133