全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Clinical Outcomes of Conservative Management of Staghorn Calculi from 2011 - 2020: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

DOI: 10.4236/ojneph.2026.163034, PP. 399-416

Keywords: Clinical Outcome, Staghorn Calculus, Conservative Management, Nephrology, Urology, Nephrolithiasis, Kidney Stone, Medical Treatment, Morbidity, Mortality, Renal Function, Active Surveillance, Non-Operative

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: Staghorn calculi remain a large challenge due to its risk of renal deterioration, association with life-threatening sepsis, and complexity of its treatment. Its occurrence is of particular importance because it often carries high morbidity and mortality rates. Untreated stones can lead to urosepsis, recurrent urinary tract infections, renal decline, and death. Surgical intervention has always been the mainstay of treatment of staghorn calculi portraying higher survival rates as compared to conservative management. However, there are patients who had conservative management, who survived and even showed improvement of their estimated glomerular filtration rate, signifying that this intervention is not as unsafe as it was previously perceived to be. Objectives: This study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of conservative management of patients with staghorn calculi. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study of 40 enrolled patients admitted at Perpetual Succour Hospital, Cebu City, from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020. Patients who are 18 years old and above, with or without co-morbidities, admitted, and diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral staghorn calculi via computed tomography scan, ultrasound, or intravenous pyelography were included; while patients who are below 18 years old, with lithiasis other than staghorn calculi, end-stage renal disease, and terminally ill were excluded from the study. Data was collected through chart review to answer the general and specific objectives. The patients enrolled were followed-up through a call to evaluate clinical outcomes. A chi-square test was utilized to determine the association of categorical factors and the clinical outcomes of patients with staghorn calculi managed conservatively. Results: Forty patients qualified for the study. Most of the patients were elderly or aged more than 60 years old (40%), predominantly female (60%), and mostly dependents (55%). They are all Filipino (100%) and mostly fall under the healthy weight class with a BMI of 18.5 to < 25 cm (37.5%). Most of them were hypertensive (57.5%) and diabetic (30%), and they also had a family history of hypertension (47.5%) and diabetes mellitus (37.5%) mostly. They were predominantly non-smokers (80%), non-alcoholic beverage drinkers (72.5%), and had no history of illicit drug use (100%). On admission, most patients had an eGFR of 30 - 44 (25%) followed by an eGFR of 60 - 89 (22.5%). The most common signs and symptoms presented were flank pain (35%) and fever (30%). Most of

References

[1]  Chen, W., Monk, R. and Bushinsky, D. (2019) Nephrolithiasis and Nephrocalcinosis. In: Feehally, J., Floege, J., Tonelli, M. and Johnson, R., Ed., Comprehensive Clinical Nephrology, 6th Edition, Elsevier, 689, 699-670.
[2]  Meng, M. and Stoller, M. (2021) Struvite and Staghorn Calculi. Medscape.
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/439127-overview
[3]  Gettman, M.T. and Segura, J.W. (1999) Struvite Stones: Diagnosis and Current Treatment Concepts. Journal of Endourology, 13, 653-658.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1999.13.653
[4]  Preminger, G., Assimos, D.G., Lingeman, J.E., et al. (2005) Report on the Management of Staghorn Calculi. American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., 1-2.
https://www.auanet.org/documents/Guidelines/Staghorn-Calculi-Archived.pdf
[5]  Diri, A. and Diri, B. (2018) Management of Staghorn Renal Stones. Renal Failure, 40, 357-362.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x.2018.1459306
[6]  Kennedy, K., Lailas, N., Mendrysa, J., et al. (2022) Staghorn Kidney Stones.
https://urologygroupvirginia.com/kidney-stone-center/staghorn-stones/
[7]  Singh, M., Chapman, R., Tresidder, G.C. and Blandy, J. (1973) The Fate of the Unoperated Staghorn Calculus. British Journal of Urology, 45, 581-585.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1973.tb12226.x
[8]  Subramonian, K., Barba, H.S. and Darrad, M. (2020) Role of Conservative Management of Stones. Urology Research and Practice, 46, S64-S69.
https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20465
[9]  Koga, S., Arakaki, Y., Matsuoka, M. and Ohyama, C. (1991) Staghorn Calculi—Long‐term Results of Management. British Journal of Urology, 68, 122-124.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15278.x
[10]  Deutsch, P.G. and Subramonian, K. (2016) Conservative Management of Staghorn Calculi: A Single‐Centre Experience. BJU International, 118, 444-450.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13393
[11]  Morgan, T.N., Shahait, M., Maganty, A., Ost, M., Jackman, S., Averch, T., et al. (2018) Conservative Management of Staghorn Calculi: When Is It Safe? Journal of Endourology, 32, 541-545.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0002
[12]  Chakraborty, A., Alshamsi, H., Sadri, I., Andonian, S., Fahmy, N. and Hamouche, F. (2024) The Conservative Management of Staghorn Stone Patients: Evaluation of Safety and Clinical Outcomes. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 19, E65-E68.
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8786

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133