全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Convergence Exposure Premium: A Risk-Adjusted Model for Industrial Digital Transformation and IT/OT Connectivity

DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2026.168043, PP. 804-825

Keywords: Digital Transformation, IT/OT Convergence, Industrial Management, Cyber Risk, Risk-Adjusted Investment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Industrial digital transformation is frequently justified through expected productivity, visibility, and analytics gains, yet investment cases often omit outright failure, value-destructive underperformance, lifecycle support, cyber exposure, and connectivity debt. This paper develops the Convergence Exposure Premium (CEP) and Risk-Adjusted Industrial Transformation Value (RAITV) framework for evaluating industrial digital transformation and information technology/operational technology (IT/OT) connectivity. Unlike conventional risk-adjusted net present value, expected-loss, cybersecurity-investment, and real-options approaches, the framework isolates the incremental cyber loss attributable to a proposed connectivity architecture and combines it with maturity-adjusted success, underperformance, and failure branches. An integrative evidence synthesis and model-based sensitivity analysis were used. All monetary inputs were defined as five-year discounted present values, using an illustrative 8% discount rate, and normalized to base-year annual revenue of 100 units. Under the stated triangular assumptions, a fixed-seed Monte Carlo analysis of 20,000 runs produced a median RAITV of ?0.040 and 51.6% negative runs; these values describe model behavior rather than an industry failure rate. Scenario results show that broad convergence can be negative-value when benefits are modest and exposure is high, while selective digitalization on mature operations can remain positive. The contribution is an architecture-sensitive, reproducible investment framework that treats non-connection, read-only exchange, and bidirectional convergence as explicit alternatives rather than assuming convergence is inevitable.

References

[1]  Abreu-Ledón, R., Luján-García, D. E., Garrido-Vega, P., & Escobar-Pérez, B. (2018). A Meta-Analytic Study of the Impact of Lean Production on Business Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 83-102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.015
[2]  Benaroch, M., & Kauffman, R. J. (1999). A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments. Information Systems Research, 10, 70-86.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.1.70
[3]  Bettiol, M., Capestro, M., Di Maria, E., & Furlan, A. (2019). Impacts of Industry 4.0 Investments on Firm Performance: Evidence from Italy (Marco Fanno Working Paper No. 233). Department of Economics and Management, University of Padova.
https://www.economia.unipd.it/sites/economia.unipd.it/files/20190233.pd
[4]  Biondo, D., Kai, D. A., Pinheiro de Lima, E., & Benitez, G. B. (2024). The Contradictory Effect of Lean and Industry 4.0 Synergy on Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35, 405-433.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-10-2023-0447
[5]  Boston Consulting Group (2020). Flipping the Odds of Digital Transformation Success.
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/increasing-odds-of-success-in-digital-transformation
[6]  Boston Consulting Group (2024). Most Large-Scale Tech Programs Fail: How to Succeed.
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/most-large-scale-tech-programs-fail-how-to-succeed
[7]  Buer, S. V., Semini, M., Strandhagen, J. O., & Sgarbossa, F. (2021). The Complementary Effect of Lean Manufacturing and Digitalisation on Operational Performance. International Journal of Production Research, 59, 1976-1992.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1790684
[8]  ?re?nar, R., Dabi?, M., Stoj?i?, N., & Nedelko, Z. (2022). It Takes Two to Tango: Technological and Non-Technological Factors of Industry 4.0 Implementation in Manufacturing Firms. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 827-853.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00543-7
[9]  Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, National Cyber Security Centre, Australian Signals Directorate, Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, & Partner Agencies (2026). Secure Connectivity Principles for Operational Technology (OT).
https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-connectivity-principles-operational-technology-ot
[10]  de Waal, A. A. (2026). Beyond the 70% Myth: What Do We Actually Know about Failure Rates in Improvement and Transformation Initiatives? Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness, 16, 16-30.
https://doi.org/10.5937/jemc2600001w
[11]  Dragos (2026). Dragos 2026 OT Cybersecurity Report: A Year in Review.
https://www.dragos.com/ot-cybersecurity-year-in-review
[12]  Elicit (2026). Elicit: AI for Scientific Research.
https://elicit.com/
[13]  Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2002). The Economics of Information Security Investment. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 5, 438-457.
https://doi.org/10.1145/581271.581274
[14]  Hajli, M., Sims, J. M., & Ibragimov, V. (2015). Information Technology (IT) Productivity Paradox in the 21st Century. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64, 457-478.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2012-0129
[15]  IBM (2025). Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025.
https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach
[16]  Kamiya, S., Kang, J. K., Kim, J., Milidonis, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2021). Risk Management, Firm Reputation, and the Impact of Successful Cyberattacks on Target Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 139, 719-749.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.05.019
[17]  National Institute of Standards and Technology (2012). Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments (NIST Special Publication 800-30 Revision 1).
https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-30r1
[18]  Oduro, S., De Nisco, A., & Mainolfi, G. (2023). Do Digital Technologies Pay Off? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Digital Technologies/Firm Performance Nexus. Technovation, 128, Article ID: 102836.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102836
[19]  Perrier, N., Denford, J. S., & Pellerin, R. (2026). Have the Promises of Industry 4.0 Been Fulfilled? a Meta-Analysis of Industry 4.0 Solution Outcomes in SMEs. International Journal of Production Research.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2026.2672747
[20]  Schwartz, E. S., & Zozaya-Gorostiza, C. (2003). Investment under Uncertainty in Information Technology: Acquisition and Development Projects. Management Science, 49, 57-70.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.1.57.12753
[21]  Schweikl, S., & Obermaier, R. (2020). Lessons from Three Decades of IT Productivity Research: Towards a Better Understanding of It-Induced Productivity Effects. Management Review Quarterly, 70, 461-507.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00173-6
[22]  Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., & Hahn, A. (2023). Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security (NIST Special Publication 800-82 Rev. 3). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-82r3
[23]  Tortorella, G. L., Giglio, R., & van Dun, D. H. (2019). Industry 4.0 Adoption as a Moderator of the Impact of Lean Production Practices on Operational Performance Improvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39, 860-886.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-01-2019-0005
[24]  U.S. Department of Energy (2021). Colonial Pipeline Cyber Incident.
https://www.energy.gov/ceser/colonial-pipeline-cyber-incident
[25]  Vieira, J., Almeida, N. M. D., Po?as Martins, J., Patrício, H., & Morgado, J. G. (2024). Analysing the Value of Digital Twinning Opportunities in Infrastructure Asset Management. Infrastructures, 9, Article 158.
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9090158

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133