全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

CTK Derma AI: Any Skin Tone-Aware AI Capture Calibration for Objective Quantification of Facial Aging Features: Validation across Fitzpatrick Phototypes I - VI

DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2026.163012, PP. 161-175

Keywords: Skin Diagnosis, Skin Aging, Wrinkle, Pore, Spots, CTK Derma AI, Skin Phototype

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Image-based assessment of facial aging signs is sensitive to lighting, device-dependent color rendering, and skin phototype, which can compromise reproducibility and fairness across diverse populations. Objective: To validate a skin tone-aware AI-based image capture calibration and analysis framework (CTK Derma AI) for the objective quantification of pores, pigmented spots, and wrinkles across Fitzpatrick phototypes I - VI, using expert visual grading as the reference standard. Methods: Facial images from 265 participants were captured using a handheld CTK ChoiceDx? platform device under a standardized imaging protocol. Participants were grouped into Fitzpatrick I - II (n = 58), III - IV (n = 61), and V - VI (n = 146). Regions of interest included the periorbital area for wrinkle analysis and the central cheek for pore, spot and skin tone (L-value) analysis by the image analysis, and then graded by the expert graders. CTK Derma AI analysis framework was trained by half of the dataset (n = 132), then validated using the remaining dataset (n = 133). CTK Derma AI pipeline was compared with a conventional non-calibrated image-processing baseline (called Control, hereafter). Scores were normalized to a 0 - 100 scale, with higher scores indicating fewer visible aging signs. Correlations with expert grading were assessed using Pearson’s r; differences between dependent correlations were pre-specified for R-based Steiger/ Meng-style testing. Repeatability was evaluated across three repeated captures per subject. Results: CTK Derma AI showed statistically stronger overall correlations with expert grading than Control for pores, spots, wrinkles and skin tone. The largest improvements were observed in the Fitzpatrick V - VI subgroup. Repeatability was high across all phototypes (CV = 4.5%; provisional ICC (2, 1) = 0.975, 95% CI 0.970 - 0.979). Conclusions: CTK Derma AI provides robust, objective, and repeatable quantification of key facial aging features across diverse skin phototypes and outperforms a conventional non-calibrated baseline workflow.

References

[1]  Miyamoto, K., Fujii, K., Wanigasekara, S., Ding, B., Munakata, Y., Wang, S., et al. (2025) Skin Age Index: Development of a Convenient and Quantitative Indicator of Facial Skin Aging and Its Application to Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Anti-Aging Skin Care Products Containing GFF (Pitera). Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 15, 46-61.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2025.151004
[2]  Nkengne, A., Roure, R., Rossi, A.B. and Bertin, C. (2013) The Skin Aging Index: A New Approach for Documenting Anti‐Aging Products or Procedures. Skin Research and Technology, 19, 291-298.
https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12040
[3]  Cho, C., Lee, E., Park, G., Cho, E., Kim, N., Shin, J., et al. (2022) Evaluation of Facial Skin Age Based on Biophysical Properties in Vivo. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 21, 3546-3554.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14653
[4]  Robic, J., Nkengne, A., Lua, B.L., Bellanger, A., Hu, R. and Vie, K. (2023) Modeling of Global Skin Aging Indices among Caucasian and Asian Women. Skin Research and Technology, 29, e13222.
https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13222
[5]  Vierk?tter, A., Ranft, U., Kr?mer, U., Sugiri, D., Reimann, V. and Krutmann, J. (2009) The SCINEXA: A Novel, Validated Score to Simultaneously Assess and Differentiate between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Skin Ageing. Journal of Dermatological Science, 53, 207-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.10.001
[6]  Griffiths, C.E.M., Wang, T.S., Hamilton, T.A., et al. (1992) A Photonumeric Scale for the Assessment of Cutaneous Photodamage. Archives of Dermatology, 128, 347-351.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1992.01680130061006
[7]  Ayer, J., Ahmed, A., Duncan-Parry, E., Beck, P., Griffiths, T.W., Watson, R.E.B., et al. (2018) A Photonumeric Scale for the Assessment of Atrophic Facial Photodamage. British Journal of Dermatology, 178, 1190-1195.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16331
[8]  Hamer, M.A., Jacobs, L.C., Lall, J.S., Wollstein, A., Hollestein, L.M., Rae, A.R., et al. (2015) Validation of Image Analysis Techniques to Measure Skin Aging Features from Facial Photographs. Skin Research and Technology, 21, 392-402.
https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12205
[9]  Harvey, V.M., Alexis, A., Okeke, C.A.V., McKinley-Grant, L., Taylor, S.C., Desai, S.R., et al. (2024) Integrating Skin Color Assessments into Clinical Practice and Research: A Review of Current Approaches. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 91, 1189-1198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.067
[10]  Fitzpatrick, T.B. (1988) The Validity and Practicality of Sun-Reactive Skin Types I through VI. Archives of Dermatology, 124, 869-871.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008
[11]  Ulrich, P., Zink, A., Biedermann, T. and Sitaru, S. (2025) Beyond Fitzpatrick: Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Skin Tone Analysis in Dermatological Patients. npj Digital Medicine, 8, Article No. 378.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01770-4
[12]  Olsen, D., Nguyen, C., Hall, M., Carletti, M. and Weis, S.E. (2026) The Efficacy of the Fitzpatrick Scale in Clinical Practice. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 7, Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.2207
[13]  Eilers, S., Bach, D.Q., Gaber, R., Blatt, H., Guevara, Y., Nitsche, K., et al. (2013) Accuracy of Self-Report in Assessing Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes I through VI. JAMA Dermatology, 149, 1289-1294.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6101
[14]  Cu, C.W., Dundas, N.E., Heintz, T., Sheikh, Z.A., Alonso-Bermudez, B., Walker, J., et al. (2025) Validity of Two Subjective Skin Tone Scales and Its Implications on Healthcare Model Fairness. npj Digital Medicine, 8, Article No. 595.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01975-7
[15]  Mbatha, S.K., Booysen, M.J. and Theart, R.P. (2024) Skin Tone Estimation under Diverse Lighting Conditions. Journal of Imaging, 10, Article 109.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10050109
[16]  Branciforti, F., Meiburger, K.M., Zavattaro, E., Veronese, F., Tarantino, V., Mazzoletti, V., et al. (2023) Impact of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Color Constancy on Dermoscopical Assessment of Skin Lesions: A Comparative Study. Skin Research and Technology, 29, e13508.
https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13508
[17]  Jung, G., Kim, S. and Yoo, S. (2024) Skin Tone Analysis through Skin Tone Map Generation with Optical Approach and Deep Learning. Skin Research and Technology, 30, e70088.
https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70088
[18]  Yoon, H., Kim, S., Lee, J. and Yoo, S. (2023) Deep-Learning-Based Morphological Feature Segmentation for Facial Skin Image Analysis. Diagnostics, 13, Article 1894.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111894
[19]  Henseler, H., et al. (2023) Assessment of the Reproducibility and Accuracy of the Visia? Complexion Analysis Camera System for Objective Skin Analysis of Facial Wrinkles and Skin Age. GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 12, Doc07.
[20]  Shrout, P.E. and Fleiss, J.L. (1979) Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
[21]  McGraw, K.O. and Wong, S.P. (1996) Forming Inferences about Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30
[22]  International Commission on Illumination (CIE) (2019) Colorimetry—Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Colour Space (ISO/CIE 11664-4:2019).
[23]  Chardon, A., Cretois, I. and Hourseau, C. (1991) Skin Colour Typology and Suntanning Pathways. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 13, 191-208.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.1991.tb00561.x
[24]  Steiger, J.H. (1980) Tests for Comparing Elements of a Correlation Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
[25]  Meng, X., Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D.B. (1992) Comparing Correlated Correlation Coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172
[26]  Diedenhofen, B. and Musch, J. (2015) Cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations. PLOS ONE, 10, e0121945.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
[27]  Martin Bland, J. and Altman, D. (1986) Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. The Lancet, 327, 307-310.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133