CTK Derma AI: Any Skin Tone-Aware AI Capture Calibration for Objective Quantification of Facial Aging Features: Validation across Fitzpatrick Phototypes I - VI
Background: Image-based assessment of facial aging signs is sensitive to lighting, device-dependent color rendering, and skin phototype, which can compromise reproducibility and fairness across diverse populations. Objective: To validate a skin tone-aware AI-based image capture calibration and analysis framework (CTK Derma AI) for the objective quantification of pores, pigmented spots, and wrinkles across Fitzpatrick phototypes I - VI, using expert visual grading as the reference standard. Methods: Facial images from 265 participants were captured using a handheld CTK ChoiceDx? platform device under a standardized imaging protocol. Participants were grouped into Fitzpatrick I - II (n = 58), III - IV (n = 61), and V - VI (n = 146). Regions of interest included the periorbital area for wrinkle analysis and the central cheek for pore, spot and skin tone (L-value) analysis by the image analysis, and then graded by the expert graders. CTK Derma AI analysis framework was trained by half of the dataset (n = 132), then validated using the remaining dataset (n = 133). CTK Derma AI pipeline was compared with a conventional non-calibrated image-processing baseline (called Control, hereafter). Scores were normalized to a 0 - 100 scale, with higher scores indicating fewer visible aging signs. Correlations with expert grading were assessed using Pearson’s r; differences between dependent correlations were pre-specified for R-based Steiger/ Meng-style testing. Repeatability was evaluated across three repeated captures per subject. Results: CTK Derma AI showed statistically stronger overall correlations with expert grading than Control for pores, spots, wrinkles and skin tone. The largest improvements were observed in the Fitzpatrick V - VI subgroup. Repeatability was high across all phototypes (CV = 4.5%; provisional ICC (2, 1) = 0.975, 95% CI 0.970 - 0.979). Conclusions: CTK Derma AI provides robust, objective, and repeatable quantification of key facial aging features across diverse skin phototypes and outperforms a conventional non-calibrated baseline workflow.
References
[1]
Miyamoto, K., Fujii, K., Wanigasekara, S., Ding, B., Munakata, Y., Wang, S., et al. (2025) Skin Age Index: Development of a Convenient and Quantitative Indicator of Facial Skin Aging and Its Application to Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Anti-Aging Skin Care Products Containing GFF (Pitera). JournalofCosmetics, DermatologicalSciencesandApplications, 15, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2025.151004
[2]
Nkengne, A., Roure, R., Rossi, A.B. and Bertin, C. (2013) The Skin Aging Index: A New Approach for Documenting Anti‐Aging Products or Procedures. SkinResearchandTechnology, 19, 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12040
[3]
Cho, C., Lee, E., Park, G., Cho, E., Kim, N., Shin, J., et al. (2022) Evaluation of Facial Skin Age Based on Biophysical Properties in Vivo. JournalofCosmeticDermatology, 21, 3546-3554. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14653
[4]
Robic, J., Nkengne, A., Lua, B.L., Bellanger, A., Hu, R. and Vie, K. (2023) Modeling of Global Skin Aging Indices among Caucasian and Asian Women. SkinResearchandTechnology, 29, e13222. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13222
[5]
Vierk?tter, A., Ranft, U., Kr?mer, U., Sugiri, D., Reimann, V. and Krutmann, J. (2009) The SCINEXA: A Novel, Validated Score to Simultaneously Assess and Differentiate between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Skin Ageing. JournalofDermatologicalScience, 53, 207-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.10.001
[6]
Griffiths, C.E.M., Wang, T.S., Hamilton, T.A., et al. (1992) A Photonumeric Scale for the Assessment of Cutaneous Photodamage. ArchivesofDermatology, 128, 347-351. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1992.01680130061006
[7]
Ayer, J., Ahmed, A., Duncan-Parry, E., Beck, P., Griffiths, T.W., Watson, R.E.B., et al. (2018) A Photonumeric Scale for the Assessment of Atrophic Facial Photodamage. BritishJournalofDermatology, 178, 1190-1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16331
[8]
Hamer, M.A., Jacobs, L.C., Lall, J.S., Wollstein, A., Hollestein, L.M., Rae, A.R., et al. (2015) Validation of Image Analysis Techniques to Measure Skin Aging Features from Facial Photographs. SkinResearchandTechnology, 21, 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12205
[9]
Harvey, V.M., Alexis, A., Okeke, C.A.V., McKinley-Grant, L., Taylor, S.C., Desai, S.R., et al. (2024) Integrating Skin Color Assessments into Clinical Practice and Research: A Review of Current Approaches. JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofDermatology, 91, 1189-1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.067
[10]
Fitzpatrick, T.B. (1988) The Validity and Practicality of Sun-Reactive Skin Types I through VI. ArchivesofDermatology, 124, 869-871. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008
[11]
Ulrich, P., Zink, A., Biedermann, T. and Sitaru, S. (2025) Beyond Fitzpatrick: Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Skin Tone Analysis in Dermatological Patients. npjDigitalMedicine, 8, Article No. 378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01770-4
[12]
Olsen, D., Nguyen, C., Hall, M., Carletti, M. and Weis, S.E. (2026) The Efficacy of the Fitzpatrick Scale in Clinical Practice. HCAHealthcareJournalofMedicine, 7, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.2207
[13]
Eilers, S., Bach, D.Q., Gaber, R., Blatt, H., Guevara, Y., Nitsche, K., et al. (2013) Accuracy of Self-Report in Assessing Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes I through VI. JAMADermatology, 149, 1289-1294. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6101
[14]
Cu, C.W., Dundas, N.E., Heintz, T., Sheikh, Z.A., Alonso-Bermudez, B., Walker, J., et al. (2025) Validity of Two Subjective Skin Tone Scales and Its Implications on Healthcare Model Fairness. npjDigitalMedicine, 8, Article No. 595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01975-7
[15]
Mbatha, S.K., Booysen, M.J. and Theart, R.P. (2024) Skin Tone Estimation under Diverse Lighting Conditions. JournalofImaging, 10, Article 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10050109
[16]
Branciforti, F., Meiburger, K.M., Zavattaro, E., Veronese, F., Tarantino, V., Mazzoletti, V., et al. (2023) Impact of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Color Constancy on Dermoscopical Assessment of Skin Lesions: A Comparative Study. SkinResearchandTechnology, 29, e13508. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13508
[17]
Jung, G., Kim, S. and Yoo, S. (2024) Skin Tone Analysis through Skin Tone Map Generation with Optical Approach and Deep Learning. SkinResearchandTechnology, 30, e70088. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70088
[18]
Yoon, H., Kim, S., Lee, J. and Yoo, S. (2023) Deep-Learning-Based Morphological Feature Segmentation for Facial Skin Image Analysis. Diagnostics, 13, Article 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111894
[19]
Henseler, H., et al. (2023) Assessment of the Reproducibility and Accuracy of the Visia? Complexion Analysis Camera System for Objective Skin Analysis of Facial Wrinkles and Skin Age. GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 12, Doc07.
[20]
Shrout, P.E. and Fleiss, J.L. (1979) Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. PsychologicalBulletin, 86, 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
[21]
McGraw, K.O. and Wong, S.P. (1996) Forming Inferences about Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. PsychologicalMethods, 1, 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30
[22]
International Commission on Illumination (CIE) (2019) Colorimetry—Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Colour Space (ISO/CIE 11664-4:2019).
[23]
Chardon, A., Cretois, I. and Hourseau, C. (1991) Skin Colour Typology and Suntanning Pathways. InternationalJournalofCosmeticScience, 13, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.1991.tb00561.x
[24]
Steiger, J.H. (1980) Tests for Comparing Elements of a Correlation Matrix. PsychologicalBulletin, 87, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
[25]
Meng, X., Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D.B. (1992) Comparing Correlated Correlation Coefficients. PsychologicalBulletin, 111, 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172
[26]
Diedenhofen, B. and Musch, J. (2015) Cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations. PLOSONE, 10, e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
[27]
Martin Bland, J. and Altman, D. (1986) Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. TheLancet, 327, 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8