全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Risk Hazards, Quantitative Measurement, and Influencing Mechanism of Industrial Special Railway Lines in China: Empirical Analysis Based on Regional Panel Operation Data

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2026.143038, PP. 610-623

Keywords: Industrial Special Railway Line, Railway Siding, Safety Risk Hazard, Super-SBM Undesirable Output Model, Malmquist Index, Tobit Regression, Risk Influencing Mechanism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Industrial special railway lines constitute the freight “last mile” of China’s railway network, while scattered property rights and aging safety facilities trigger frequent safety accidents. Existing railway literature lacks systematic quantitative research on the hidden dangers of special lines. Based on official supervision and accident panel data of 32 industrial special railway lines from 2022 to 2025 released by the State Railway Administration of China, this paper constructs an input-output risk evaluation system containing undesirable accident outputs covering human, capital, and equipment safety inputs. The Super-SBM model with reciprocal transformed accident indicators is adopted to measure static safety risk efficiency, the Malmquist index decomposes dynamic risk evolution characteristics, and a Tobit truncated regression model is built to identify core risk influencing factors. The empirical results show that the overall safety risk of industrial special railway lines presents a continuous upward trend year by year; coal mine dedicated railways in North China bear the highest risk level, and manufacturing railway sidings in Central China maintain better safety control performance. Human error operation, unattended level crossing density, and dangerous goods transport proportion significantly aggravate operational risks, whereas intelligent monitoring coverage effectively restricts hidden danger outbreaks. This study distinguishes heterogeneous risk characteristics of different types of special lines and puts forward differentiated hierarchical risk prevention and control strategies, which can provide quantitative decision support for railway supervision departments and industrial enterprises to implement refined safety management.

References

[1]  Chen, Y. (2013) Improving Railway Safety Risk Assessment Study. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Birmingham.
[2]  Haghighi, E., Kasraei, A., Kumar, U., Famurewa, S. and Garmabaki, A.H.S. (2026) Data-Driven Risk Assessment of Climate-Related Failures in Railway Infrastructure. Sustainable Cities and Society, 146, Article ID: 107519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2026.107519
[3]  Carusone, P., Benedictis, A.D. and Gerbasio, D. (2025) Methodologies and Tools for Quantitative Risk Assessment Including the Human Factor Analysis: A Railway Case Study. 2025 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Vienna, 5-8 October 2025, 1354-1359.
https://doi.org/10.1109/smc58881.2025.11343060
[4]  Jamshidi, A., Faghih Roohi, S., Nú?ez, A., Babuska, R., De Schutter, B., Dollevoet, R., et al. (2016) Probabilistic Defect-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Rail Failures in Railway Infrastructure. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49, 73-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.013
[5]  Huang, W. and Zhang, Y. (2021) Railway Dangerous Goods Transportation System Risk Assessment: An Approach Combining FMEA with Pessimistic-Optimistic Fuzzy Information Axiom Considering Acceptable Risk Coefficient. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 70, 371-388.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2020.2973431
[6]  Licciardello, R., Baldassarra, A., Vitali, P., Tieri, A., Cruciani, M. and Vasile, A.N. (2013) Limits and Opportunities of Risk Analysis Application in Railway Systems. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 134, 133-144.
https://doi.org/10.2495/safe130131
[7]  Ricciardi, G., Ellena, M., Barbato, G., Alcaras, E., Parente, C., Carcasi, G., et al. (2024) Risk Assessment of National Railway Infrastructure Due to Sea-Level Rise: An Application of a Methodological Framework in Italian Coastal Railways. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196, Article No. 822.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12942-2
[8]  Cheng, L., Wang, Y. and Peng, Y. (2021) Research on Risk Assessment of High-Speed Railway Operation Based on Network ANP. Smart and Resilient Transportation, 3, 37-51.
https://doi.org/10.1108/srt-10-2020-0024
[9]  Jamshidi, A., Faghih‐Roohi, S., Hajizadeh, S., Nú?ez, A., Babuska, R., Dollevoet, R., et al. (2017) A Big Data Analysis Approach for Rail Failure Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, 37, 1495-1507.
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12836
[10]  Shi, Y., Tian, S., Chen, Y., Cai, C., Guan, H. and Li, X. (2025) Risk Assessment Method of Railway Engineering Technology Innovation in Complex Areas. Mathematics, 13, Article No. 1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13121970

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133