全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Geomaterials  2026 

Calibrating Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation Methods for Typical Swedish Tills Used as Core Materials

DOI: 10.4236/gm.2026.163007, PP. 106-126

Keywords: Hydraulic Conductivity, Glacial Till, Core Materials, Empirical Equations, Calibration

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Empirical hydraulic-conductivity equations are widely used in geotechnical engineering, but none were developed specifically for the low-permeability glacial tills commonly used as core and seepage-control materials. This study evaluates and calibrates empirical conductivity equations for a dataset of 26 till materials from 10 source groups, including one Finnish source group represented by six materials. The main contribution is practical. Based on till-only screening supported by a broader multi-material comparison, the study identifies the Beyer method as the best-performing gradation-based method and the Slichter method as the best-performing porosity-dependent alternative. To adapt further for typical Swedish tills, Beyer showed little benefit from recalibration, whereas Slichter showed clearer improvement from coefficient adjustment. Gradation-based methods implicitly assume a representative packing state, whereas porosity-dependent methods explicitly account for porosity. This study also provides simple practitioner aids for estimating D10 and porosity when direct material data are incomplete, for example, when sedimentation analysis or density determinations are missing. The results show that classical equations can support conductivity estimation for typical non-plastic glacial tills, but applicability remains strongly controlled by till domain, data envelope, and method class.

References

[1]  Fell, R., MacGregor, P., Stapledon, D., Bell, G. and Foster, M. (2015) Geotechnical Engineering of Dams. 2nd Edition, CRC Press.
[2]  Cedergren, H.R. (1989) Seepage, Drainage, and Flow Nets. 3rd Edition, Wiley.
[3]  Wenzel, L.K. (1942) Methods for Determining Permeability of Water-Bearing Materials. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 887.
[4]  Hazen, A. (1892) Some Physical Properties of Sands and Gravels, with Special Reference to Their Use in Filtration. In: 24th Annual Report, Massachusetts State Board of Health, 539-556.
[5]  Slichter, C.S. (1899) Theoretical Investigation of the Motion of Ground Waters. U.S. Geological Survey, 19th Annual Report, Part II.
[6]  Kozeny, J. (1927) über kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 136, 271-306.
[7]  Carman, P.C. (1937) Fluid Flow through Granular Beds. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 15, 150-166.
[8]  Beyer, W. (1964) Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchl?ssigkeit von Kiesen und Sanden aus der Kornverteilungskurve. Wasserwirtschaft-Wassertechnik, 14, 165-169.
[9]  Shepherd, R.G. (1989) Correlations of Permeability and Grain Size. Groundwater, 27, 633-638.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1989.tb00476.x
[10]  Alyamani, M.S. and ?en, Z. (1993) Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity from Complete Grain‐Size Distribution Curves. Groundwater, 31, 551-555.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00587.x
[11]  Chapuis, R.P. (2004) Predicting the Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils: A Review. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 63, 291-298.
[12]  Odong, J. (2007) Evaluation of Empirical Formulae for Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity Based on Grain-Size Analysis. Journal of American Science, 3, 54-60.
[13]  Wang, J.P., Fran?ois, B. and Lambert, P. (2017) Equations for Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation from Particle Size Distribution: A Dimensional Analysis. Water Resources Research, 53, 8127-8134.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020888
[14]  Urumovi?, K., Borovi?, S., Urumovi?, K. and Navratil, D. (2020) Validity Range and Reliability of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Method in Hydrogeological Investigations. Hydrogeology Journal, 28, 625-636.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02080-2
[15]  Goodarzi, M.R., Vazirian, M. and Niazkar, M. (2024) Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation: Comparison of Empirical Formulas Based on New Laboratory Experiments. Water, 16, Article 1854.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131854
[16]  R?nnqvist, H. (2026) Long-Term Hydraulic Conductivity Evolution after Attainment of Steady-State Flow. Submitted.
[17]  R?nnqvist, H. (2026) Evaluation of Empirical Hydraulic Conductivity Equations Using Standard and Long-Term Conductivity Measurements. Geomaterials, 16.
[18]  Swedish Institute for Standards (2018) SS-EN ISO 17892-3: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Laboratory Testing of Soil—Part 3: Determination of Particle Density. SIS.
[19]  ASTM International (2012) ASTM D1557-12e1: Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort 56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3). ASTM International.
[20]  Britannica (2025) Till. Encyclopaedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/science/till
[21]  SGU (2020) Mor?n: Sp?r av inlandsisen. Sveriges Geologiska Unders?kning. (Till: Traces of The Inland Ice. Geological Survey of Sweden).
[22]  SGU (2020) Sveriges Berggrund. Sveriges Geologiska Unders?kning. (The Bedrock of Sweden. Geological Survey of Sweden).
[23]  SGU (2020) Sveriges Geologi. Sveriges Geologiska Unders?kning. (Geology of Sweden. Geological Survey of Sweden).
[24]  Grischek, T. and Beyer, K.-D. (2019) Wolfgang Beyer: A Groundwater Scientist from Dresden. Groundwater, 57, 980-983.
[25]  R?nnqvist, H. (2026) Robustness of Fitted Behavioural Relationships from Limited Geotechnical Datasets: Application to Sand Castle Test Data. Open Journal of Statistics, 16.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133