全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Geometric Quadrature Method (GQM): A Singularity-Free Spatial Formulation for Constrained Motion on Arbitrary Planar Curves

DOI: 10.4236/ijmnta.2026.153007, PP. 63-89

Keywords: Constrained Dynamics, Arc-Length Parametrization, Frenet-Serret Frame, Nonlinear Dynamics, Geometric Quadrature, Speed-Field Kernel, Inflection Points, Coulomb Friction Kernel

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We present the Geometric Quadrature Method (GQM), a coordinate-free, spatial-domain framework for the dynamics of a particle constrained to an arbitrary smooth planar curve. By adopting arc-length parametrization and the Frenet–Serret frame, GQM eliminates the coordinate singularities inherent in Cartesian systems, which fail at vertical tangents or multi-valued trajectory regions. The method operates as a three-pass pipeline. Pass 1 delivers the spatial speed field and normal contact force in exact closed form for any curve with an analytic height function—no quadrature, no approximation, including the full rail loading map and liftoff conditions. Pass 2 confines the time-of-flight computation, which is irreducibly non-elementary by Liouville’s theorem, to a single adaptive quadrature evaluated to machine precision. Pass 3 recovers phase-stable long-time trajectories for conservative systems by exact half-period tiling, bounding accumulated phase error many orders of magnitude below standard explicit or symplectic ODE integrators. The pipeline is anchored on a speed-field kernel encoding the force model in modular form: redefining the kernel alone accommodates friction, quadratic drag, and rotating-frame potentials, leaving the quadrature pipeline intact. Six such kernels are derived. Numerical validation includes a simple pendulum benchmarked against RK4, with symplectic (St?rmer-Verlet) behaviour discussed analytically via its known error scaling, and a cubic curve with an inflection point and Coulomb friction, demonstrating that the continuously signed Frenet frame handles curvature sign changes without frame-flip artefacts; the latter result is cross-checked against an independent direct time-domain integration of the same friction model. A unified table reduces eight standard curve families to this single framework.

References

[1]  Bernoulli, J. (1696) Problema Novum ad Cujus Solutionem Mathematici Invitantur. Acta Eruditorum, 1696, 269.
[2]  Goldstein, H., Poole, C. and Safko, J. (2002) Classical Mechanics. 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley.
[3]  Lagrange, J.L. (1788) Mécanique Analytique. Desaint.
[4]  ?alini?, S. (2009) Contribution to the Brachistochrone Problem with Coulomb Friction. Acta Mechanica, 208, 97-115.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-008-0134-3
[5]  ?alini?, S., Obradovi?, A., Mitrovi?, Z. and Rusov, S. (2012) Brachistochrone with Limited Reaction of Constraint in an Arbitrary Force Field. Nonlinear Dynamics, 69, 211-222.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0258-1
[6]  Cherkasov, O.Y., Malykh, E.V. and Smirnova, N.V. (2023) Brachistochrone Problem and Two-Dimensional Goddard Problem. Nonlinear Dynamics, 111, 243-254.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07857-x
[7]  Shabana, A.A. (2021) Frenet Oscillations and Frenet-Euler Angles: Curvature Singularity and Motion-Trajectory Analysis. Nonlinear Dynamics, 106, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06798-1
[8]  Bettamin, D., Shabana, A.A., Bosso, N. and Zampieri, N. (2021) Frenet Force Analysis in Performance Evaluation of Railroad Vehicle Systems. Acta Mechanica, 232, 4235-4259.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03045-x
[9]  Marques, F., Flores, P., Pimenta Claro, J.C. and Lankarani, H.M. (2016) A Survey and Comparison of Several Friction Force Models for Dynamic Analysis of Multibody Mechanical Systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 86, 1407-1443.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2999-3
[10]  Hairer, E., Lubich, C. and Wanner, G. (2006) Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations. 2nd Edition, Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30666-8
[11]  Battin, R.H. (1999) An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, Revised Edition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.2514/4.861543
[12]  Prussing, J.E. and Conway, B.A. (1993) Orbital Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
[13]  Ritt, J.F. (1948) Integration in Finite Terms: Liouville’s Theory of Elementary Methods. Columbia University Press.
https://doi.org/10.7312/ritt91596
[14]  Piessens, R., de Doncker-Kapenga, E., überhuber, C.W. and Kahaner, D.K. (1983) QUADPACK: A Subroutine Package for Automatic Integration. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61786-7
[15]  Leimkuhler, B. and Reich, S. (2009). Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614118

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133