Since the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013, China-EU economic relations have entered a new stage characterised by deeper trade connectivity, increasing investment cooperation, and growing geopolitical competition. Although several EU member states have joined BRI-related cooperation mechanisms, the European Union as a whole remains cautious toward the initiative. This paper examines two interrelated dimensions: the internal challenges that have emerged within the BRI - including debt sustainability concerns, environmental and social governance (ESG) risks, and waning international public perception - and the external repercussions of the BRI on the European Union, focusing on geoeconomic and geopolitical influences. Drawing on policy analysis and qualitative assessment of official data from Chinese and EU sources, think tank reports, and academic literature, the paper argues that while the BRI has generated economic opportunities, its sustainability is increasingly questioned. The EU’s perception of the BRI has shifted from viewing it as an economic opportunity to recognising it as a source of geoeconomic competition and internal cohesion pressure. The paper concludes that the BRI is at a crossroads, and China’s recalibration towards a ‘greener’ and more transparent model will determine its future compatibility with European interests.
References
[1]
Anderlini, J., & Caulcutt, C. (2023). Europe Must Resist Pressure to Become “America’s Followers”, Says Macron. Politico, 12 April. https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-china-america-pressure-interview/
[2]
Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by Other Means: Geo-economics and Statecraft. Harvard University Press. https://www.cfr.org/books/war-other-means
Brautigam, D. (2019). A Critical Look at Chinese “Debt-Trap Diplomacy”: The Rise of a Meme. Area Development and Policy,5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2019.1689828
[5]
Cai, K. G. (2018). The One Belt One Road and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Beijing’s New Strategy of Geo-economics and Geopolitics. JournalofContemporaryChina,27, 831-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1488101
[6]
Custer, S., Horigoshi, A., & Marshall, K. (2024). BRI from the Ground Up: Leaders from 129 Countries Evaluate a Decade of Beijing’s Signature Initiative. AidData at William & Mary. https://docs.aiddata.org/reports/bri-from-the-ground-up/full-report.pdf
[7]
Eder, T. S., & Mardell, J. (2019). Powering the Belt and Road. Merics. https://merics.org/en/tracker/powering-belt-and-road
[8]
European Commission (2019). EU-China—A Strategic Outlook. JOIN/2019/5 Final. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2019-03/communication-eu-china-a-strategic-outlook.pdf
[9]
European Commission (2023). European Economic Security Strategy. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/european-economic-security/
[10]
European Economic and Social Committee (2023). Global Battle of Offers—From the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative to the EU Global Gateway: The Vision of European Organised Civil Society. REX/572-EESC-2023. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1574/oj/eng
[11]
European Foundation for South Asian Studies (EFSAS) (2024). China’s Belt-and-Road Initiative in Europe: Assessing Germany and Italy’s Responses and Strategic Shifts. https://www.efsas.org/news-and-cases/2024/04/09/efsas-study-paper-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-in-europe/
[12]
European Parliament (2021). Towards a Joint Western Alternative to the Belt and Road Initiative? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021)698824
[13]
European Parliament (2023). Security Implications of China-Owned Critical Infrastructure in the European Union. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_IDA(2023)702592
[14]
Fathi, K. (2024). The Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic Orientations for the Eu. Zeitschrift für Au？en-und Sicherheitspolitik, 17, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-023-00973-5
[15]
Galluzzo, M. (2023). L’Italia è uscita dalla Via della Seta: la nota d’addio consegnata a Pechino. Corriere Della Sera, 6 December. https://www.corriere.it/politica/23_dicembre_06/italia-uscita-via-seta-caed5644-9423-11ee-bf17-27011c9bfd8d.shtml
[16]
Green Finance & Development Center (2023). Elevating ESG: Empirical Lessons on Environmental, Social and Governance Implementation of Chinese Projects in Africa. https://greenfdc.org/elevating-esg-empirical-lessons-on-environmental-social-and-governance-implementation-of-chinese-projects-in-africa/
[17]
Huotari, M., Otero-Iglesias, M., Seaman, J., & Ekman, A. (2015). Mapping Europe-China Relations: A Bottom-Up Approach. European Think-Tank Network on China (ETNC). https://merics.org/en/report/mapping-europe-china-relations-bottom-approach
[18]
Hurley, J., Morris, S., & Portelance, G. (2019). Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective. JournalofInfrastructurePolicyandDevelopment,3, 1123. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123
[19]
Lasserre, F., & Pelletier, S. (2011). Polar Super Seaways? Maritime Transport in the Arctic: An Analysis of Shipowners’ Intentions. JournalofTransportGeography,19, 1465-1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.08.006
[20]
Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17-23.
[21]
Mingey, M., & Wright, L. (2023). China’s External Debt Renegotiations after Zambia. Rhodium Group. https://rhg.com/research/chinas-external-debt-renegotiations-after-zambia/
[22]
Nedopil, C. (2022). China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report H1 2022. Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University. https://greenfdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/GFDC-2022_China-Belt-and-Road-Initiative-BRI-Investment-Report-H1-2022.pdf
[23]
Nedopil, C. (2025). China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report 2025 H1. FISF Fudan University. https://greenfdc.org/china-belt-and-road-initiative-bri-investment-report-2025-h1/
[24]
Parks, B. C., Malik, A. A., Escobar, B., Zhang, S., Fedorochko, R., Solomon, K. et al. (2023). Belt and Road Reboot: Beijing’s Bid to De-Risk Its Global Infrastructure Initiative. AidData at William & Mary. https://www.aiddata.org/publications/belt-and-road-reboot
[25]
Shah, A. R. (2019). China’s Belt and Road Initiative. AsianSurvey,59, 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2019.59.3.407
[26]
Sweet, R. (2024). Brazil Rejects Joining China’s Belt and Road. Global Construction Re-view, 8 November. https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/brazil-rejects-joining-chinas-belt-and-road/
[27]
The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China (2020). The Road Less Travelled: European Involvement in China’s Belt and Road Initiative. https://reconasia.csis.org/road-less-travelled/
[28]
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley. https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=530
[29]
Wong, M. Y. H., & Downes, J. F. (2024). Reassessing the Impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Mixed Methods Approach. JournalofChinesePoliticalScience,31, 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-024-09888-0
[30]
World Bank Group (2019). Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors. World Bank eBooks. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/448361569922674511
[31]
Yang, Y. F. (2022). Piraeus Port Project. Belt and Road Portal, 25 March. https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/p/0CLVEE6L.html
[32]
Yu, H. (2024). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-99-9633-9
[33]
Yue, M., & Nedopil, C. (2020). Public Debt Situations in the BRI: How Covid-19 Has Exacerbated an Ongoing Debt Problem in Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Green BRI Center, International Institute of Green Finance (IIGF). https://greenfdc.org/public-debt-in-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri-covid-19/
