Purpose: The objective was to clarify the relationship with physical function, balance function, and walking function in frail and non-frail groups. Method: Physical function was measured using height, weight, BMI, SMI, grip strength, knee extension strength, and balance function using a standing power measurement device (Tanita Corporation, ZARITZ, BM-220). Walking function was measured using walking speed, thoracolumbar vertical movement, and foot lift angle. Results: Ground reaction force (speed), Walking Function (walking speed, Rea Foot Lift Angle) were significantly lower in the KCL score ≥ 8 group (frail group) compared to the KCL score ≤ 7 group (non-frail group) (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). KCL total score and Ground reaction force (speed), Walking Function (walking speed, stride length Rea Foot Lift Angle) were each significantly correlated (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Balance function and gait function tests were useful for assessing frailty.
References
[1]
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2024) Monthly Report on Actual Conditions of Long-Term Care Benefits, etc. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kaigo/kyufu/2024/09.html
[2]
Iwaya, T., Kumamoto, K., Miyawaki, T., Fukuzaa, S., Sato, J. and Tuneda, T. (2017) Analysis of Responses to Kihon Check List (KCL) Items: Differences between Gender and Age Groups. Nagano University of Health Sciences Bulletin, 3, 1-11.
[3]
Fried, L.P., Tangen, C.M., Walston, J., Newman, A.B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., et al. (2001) Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56, M146-M157. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146
[4]
Satake, S., Senda, K., Hong, Y., Miura, H., Endo, H., Sakurai, T., et al. (2016) Validity of the Kihon Checklist for Assessing Frailty Status. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 16, 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12543
[5]
Shen, S., Abe, T., Tsuji, T., Fujii, K., Ma, J. and Okura, T. (2017) The Relationship between Ground Reaction Force in Sit-to-Stand Movement and Lower Extremity Function in Community-Dwelling Japanese Older Adults Using Long-Term Care Insurance Services. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29, 1561-1566. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1561
[6]
Mizuno, C., Tanaka, Y., Nakanishi, M. and Yamamoto, S. (2008) The Study of Walking Senior Citizens with 3-D Motility Analysis Equipment. The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 44, 204-205. https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.44.supplement_204
[7]
Takayuki1, H., Miyabara, H., Kishikawa, Y., et al. (2023) Relationship between Ground Reaction Forces During Chair-to-Standing Movements, Physical Function, and Fall Frequency in Individuals Requiring Support. West Kyushu Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences, 16, 13-17.
[8]
Terada, R., Naka, T., Shima, N. and Kanno, M. (2020) The Relationship between Sit-to-Stand Power Index and Movement Ability. Training Instruction, 3, 12-17.
[9]
Kobayashi, T., Iwasaki, T., Kurata, H., et al. (2002) The 30-Second Chair Stand (CS 30) Resalt Is Associated with Assessment of Frailty Using the KIhon Checklist in late-Stage Older Patients with Heart Disease. Regakuryouhougaku, 49, 299-305.
[10]
Taishi, T., Tsunoda, K., Okura, T. (2012) The Relationship between Ground Reaction Force in Sit-to-Stand and Incident Falls, Mobility Limitations in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A One-Year Longitudinal Study. Human Performance Measurement, 11, 13-23.
