Reducing Protein Content with and without Yeast Probiotic Actisaf Sc 47 Supplementation in the Diet of Dairy Cow: Effects on Milk Performance, Milk Fatty Acid Composition, Digestibility, Feed, and Economic Efficiency
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of reducing CP levels in the diet of dairy cows alone or in combination with a yeast probiotic on milk quantity and quality, milk fatty acid profile, feed and economic efficiency. In total, six cows were included in a 3 × 3 Latin square design with 3 experimental periods of 28 days long (23 days for adaptation and 5 days for data collection). Cows were randomly assigned to one of the three diets according to protein level and supplementation: control diet with 16.5 CP%DM (CTR), a diet with 14.5 CP%DM without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation (LCP), and a diet with 14.5 CP%DM with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation at 5 g/cow/day (LCPActisaf). Regarding total milk yield (TMY), a tendency for lower TMY was observed in LCP group compared with the CTR group (P = 0.1). No difference was observed between CTR and LCPActisaf groups (P = 0.90). The use of Actisaf Sc 47 mitigated the TMY reduction observed in LCP group. Milk fat (MF) and energy-corrected milk (ECM) were unaffected by treatments. Milk protein (MP, kg/d) resulted higher and tended to be higher in LCPActisaf compared to CTR (P = 0.03) and LCP (P = 0.06) but similar between CTR and LCP (P = 0.4). Compared with the CTR group, milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was reduced by both LCP and LCPActisaf (？31.8% and ？23.8%, respectively, P = 0.04). No difference was observed between LCP and LCPActisaf (P = 0.49). Reducing protein alone or in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 did not impact feed efficiency (FE) when compared to CTR (P = 0.15 and P = 0.39, respectively) but reducing protein in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 increased FE compared to reducing protein alone (P = 0.02). No differences in milk fatty acid (FA) profile were observed with the exception of a tendency for a greater concentration of linoleic acid in LCPActisaf group compared with the CTR group (P = 0.09) and LCP group (P = 0.08). Linoleic acid concentration was similar between CTR and LCP groups (P = 0.93). De novo fatty acid concentration resulted higher (P = 0.13) in LCPActisaf (28.90%) compared to CTR (27.75%) and LCP (27.9%). Health indexes explained by Atherogenic index, Thrombogenic index and omega 6/omega 3 were similar between the three treatments. From economic perspective, compared with the CTR and LCP, net revenue/kg of milk was increased and tended to increase with LCPActisaf (P = 0.05 and P = 0.1, respectively). No difference was observed between CTR and LCP groups (P
References
[1]
Stephansen, R.B., Lassen, J., Thorup, V.M., Poulsen, B.G., Jensen, J., Sahana, G., et al. (2024) Modeling Feed Efficiency over Productive Lifetime and Integrating a Submodel for Body Reserve Management in Nordic Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 108, 1757-1777. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25383
[2]
INRA (2018) Alimentation des ruminants. Apports nutritionnels-besoins et réponses des animaux-Rationnement-Tables des valeurs des aliments. Editions Quae, Versailles, 728 p.
[3]
NASEM (2021) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Eighth Revised Edition, The National Academies Press.
[4]
Sajid, Q.U.A., Wilk, M. and Asghar, M.U. (2024) Analysis of Crude Protein Utilisation in Ruminant Rations: Supplementation of Limiting Amino Acids and Their Effect on the Environment—An Updated Review. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 33, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/166576/2023
[5]
Huhtanen, P. and Hristov, A.N. (2009) A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Dietary Protein Concentration and Degradability on Milk Protein Yield and Milk N Efficiency in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 3222-3232. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1352
[6]
St-Pierre, N.R. (2012) The Costs of Nutrients, Comparison of Feedstuffs Prices and the Current Dairy Situation. The Ohio State University Extension Buckeye News.
[7]
Fadul-Pacheco, L., Pellerin, D., Chouinard, P., Wattiaux, M., Duplessis, M. and Charbonneau, é. (2017) Nitrogen Efficiency of Eastern Canadian Dairy Herds: Effect on Production Performance and Farm Profitability. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 6592-6601. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11788
[8]
Castro, S.B., Phillip, L., Lapierre, H., Jardon, P. and Berthiaume, R. (2008) The Relative Merit of Ruminal Undegradable Protein from Soybean Meal or Soluble Fiber from Beet Pulp to Improve Nitrogen Utilization in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 3947-3957. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0638
[9]
Lee, C., Hristov, A.N., Heyler, K.S., Cassidy, T.W., Long, M., Corl, B.A., et al. (2011) Effects of Dietary Protein Concentration and Coconut Oil Supplementation on Nitrogen Utilization and Production in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 5544-5557. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3889
[10]
Zeleke, A.W., Dimonaco, N.J., Lawther, K., Lavery, A., Ferris, C., Moorby, J., et al. (2025) Reducing Crude Protein Content in the Diet of Lactating Dairy Cows Improved Nitrogen-Use-Efficiency and Reduced N Excretion in Urine, Whilst Having No Obvious Effects on the Rumen Microbiome. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 16, Article No. 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-025-01240-7
[11]
Wu, Z. and Satter, L.D. (2000) Milk Production during the Complete Lactation of Dairy Cows Fed Diets Containing Different Amounts of Protein. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 1042-1051. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74968-x
[12]
Law, R.A., Young, F.J., Patterson, D.C., Kilpatrick, D.J., Wylie, A.R.G. and Mayne, C.S. (2009) Effect of Dietary Protein Content on Animal Production and Blood Metabolites of Dairy Cows during Lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1155
[13]
Katongole, C.B. and Yan, T. (2020) Effect of Varying Dietary Crude Protein Level on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility, Milk Production, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency by Lactating Holstein-Friesian Cows. Animals, 10, Article 2439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122439
[14]
Kalscheur, K.F., Vandersall, J.H., Erdman, R.A., Kohn, R.A. and Russek-Cohen, E. (1999) Effects of Dietary Crude Protein Concentration and Degradability on Milk Production Responses of Early, Mid, and Late Lactation Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 545-554. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75266-5
[15]
Reynolds, C., Crompton, L., Humphries, D. and Jones, A. (2016) Long Term Implications of Feeding Low Protein Diets to First Lactation Dairy Cows. In: Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Wageningen Academic, 263-264.
[16]
Desta, A.G. (2024) The Effect of Crude Protein and Energy on Conception of Dairy Cow: A Review. Discover Animals, 1, Article No. 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44338-024-00030-1
[17]
Oh, J., Harper, M. and Hristov, A.N. (2019) Effects of Lowering Crude Protein Supply Alone or in a Combination with Essential Oils on Productivity, Rumen Function and Nutrient Utilization in Dairy Cows. Animal, 13, 2510-2518. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731119001083
[18]
Pinloche, E., McEwan, N., Marden, J., Bayourthe, C., Auclair, E. and Newbold, C.J. (2013) The Effects of a Probiotic Yeast on the Bacterial Diversity and Population Structure in the Rumen of Cattle. PLOS ONE, 8, e67824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067824
[19]
Julien, C., Marden, J.P., Auclair, E., Moncoulon, R., Cauquil, L., Peyraud, J.L., et al. (2015) Interaction between Live Yeast and Dietary Rumen Degradable Protein Level: Effects on Diet Utilization in Early-Lactating Dairy Cows. Agricultural Sciences, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.61001
[20]
Sjaunja, L., Baevre, L., Junkkarinen, L., Pedersen, J. and Setaja, J. (1999) A Nordic Proposal for an Energy Corrected Milk (ECM) Formula. 27th Session International Committee for Recording and Productivity of Milk Animals, Paris, 2-6 July 1999, 1-4.
[21]
Grelet, C., Pierna, J.A.F., Dardenne, P., Soyeurt, H., Vanlierde, A., Colinet, F., et al. (2017) Standardization of Milk Mid-Infrared Spectrometers for the Transfer and Use of Multiple Models. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 7910-7921. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12720
[22]
Soyeurt, H., Dehareng, F., Gengler, N., McParland, S., Wall, E., Berry, D.P., et al. (2011) Mid-Infrared Prediction of Bovine Milk Fatty Acids across Multiple Breeds, Production Systems, and Countries. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 1657-1667. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3408
[23]
Ulbricht, T.L.V. and Southgate, D.A.T. (1991) Coronary Heart Disease: Seven Dietary Factors. The Lancet, 338, 985-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91846-m
[24]
Morris, D.L., Rebelo, L.R., Dieter, P.A. and Lee, C. (2018) Validating Intrinsic Markers and Optimizing Spot Sampling Frequency to Estimate Fecal Outputs. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 7980-7989. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14717
[25]
Van Keulen, J. and Young, B.A. (1977) Evaluation of Acid-Insoluble Ash as a Natural Marker in Ruminant Digestibility Studies. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 282-287. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x
[26]
Erickson, M.G., Barros, T., Aguerre, M.J., Olmos Colmenero, J.J., Bertics, S.J. and Wattiaux, M.A. (2023) Reducing Dietary Crude Protein: Effects on Digestibility, Nitrogen Balance, and Blood Metabolites in Late-Lactation Holstein Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 107, 4394-4408. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24079
[27]
Broderick, G.A. (2003) Effects of Varying Dietary Protein and Energy Levels on the Production of Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 1370-1381. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73721-7
[28]
Lee, C., Hristov, A.N., Cassidy, T.W., Heyler, K.S., Lapierre, H., Varga, G.A., et al. (2012) Rumen-Protected Lysine, Methionine, and Histidine Increase Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows Fed a Metabolizable Protein-Deficient Diet. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 6042-6056. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5581
[29]
Giallongo, F., Hristov, A.N., Oh, J., Frederick, T., Weeks, H., Werner, J., et al. (2015) Effects of Slow-Release Urea and Rumen-Protected Methionine and Histidine on Performance of Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 3292-3308. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8791
[30]
Salah, N., Legendre, H., Pain, P.P., Berger, C., Nenov, V., Machuron, F., et al. (2023) Meta-Analysis Study of the Effects of Yeast Probiotic Supplementation on Milk Production and Energy Corrected Milk of Lactating Dairy Cows. Agricultural Sciences, 14, 1179-1192. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.149079
[31]
Garnsworthy, P.C., Saunders, N., Goodman, J.R., Algherair, I.H. and Ambrose, J.D. (2025) Effects of Live Yeast on Milk Yield, Feed Efficiency, Methane Emissions and Fertility of High-Yielding Dairy Cows. Animal, 19, Article 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101379
[32]
Salah, N., Gestes, B., Ly, P., Blancou, A., Hadjeba, K., Schulthess, J., et al. (2026) Reducing Protein Content with and without Yeast Probiotic Actisaf Sc 47 Supplementation in the Diet of Dairy Cow: Effects on Nitrogen Use, Digestibility, and Rumen Microbial Protein. Animals, 16, Article 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081277
[33]
Perdomo, M.C., Marsola, R.S., Favoreto, M.G., Adesogan, A., Staples, C.R. and Santos, J.E.P. (2019) Effects of Feeding Live Yeast at 2 Dosages on Performance and Feeding Behavior of Dairy Cows under Heat Stress. Journal of Dairy Science, 103, 325-339. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17303
[34]
Mosoni, P., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Béra-Maillet, C. and Forano, E. (2007) Quantification by Real-Time PCR of Cellulolytic Bacteria in the Rumen of Sheep after Supplementation of a Forage Diet with Readily Fermentable Carbohydrates: Effect of a Yeast Additive. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, 2676-2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03517.x
[35]
Aguilar, M., Hanigan, M.D., Tucker, H.A., Jones, B.L., Garbade, S.K., McGilliard, M.L., et al. (2012) Cow and Herd Variation in Milk Urea Nitrogen Concentrations in Lactating Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 7261-7268. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5582
[36]
Kebreab, E., France, J., Mills, J.A.N., Allison, R. and Dijkstra, J. (2002) A Dynamic Model of N Metabolism in the Lactating Dairy Cow and an Assessment of Impact of N Excretion on the Environment. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 248-259. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.801248x
[37]
Kumprechtová, D., Legendre, H., Kadek, R., Nenov, V., Briche, M., Salah, N., et al. (2024) Dose Effect of Actisaf Sc 47 Yeast Probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Supplementation on Production, Reproduction, and Negative Energy Balance in Early Lactation Dairy Cows. Translational Animal Science, 8, txad132. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad132
[38]
Darabighane, B., Podda, M.G., Fancello, F. and Atzori, A.S. (2026) A Meta-Analysis of the Association between Live Yeast Supplementation and Lactation Performance in Dairy Cows under Heat Stress. Animals, 16, Article 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030428
[39]
Rossow, H.A., Riordan, T. and Riordan, A. (2018) Effects of Addition of a Live Yeast Product on Dairy Cattle Performance. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46, 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1281810
[40]
Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Walker, N.D. and Bach, A. (2008) Effects of Active Dry Yeasts on the Rumen Microbial Ecosystem: Past, Present and Future. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145, 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019
[41]
Lavery, A., Craig, A., Gordon, A.W., White, A., Barkley, N. and Ferris, C.P. (2024) Reducing Dietary Crude Protein Levels While Meeting Metabolizable Protein Requirements: Performance of Dairy Cows over a Full Lactation Period. Journal of Dairy Science, 108, 1451-1473. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25405
[42]
DeVries, T.J. and Chevaux, E. (2014) Modification of the Feeding Behavior of Dairy Cows through Live Yeast Supplementation. Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 6499-6510. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8226
[43]
Bach, K.D., Barbano, D.M. and McArt, J.A.A. (2019) Association of Mid-Infrared-Predicted Milk and Blood Constituents with Early-Lactation Disease, Removal, and Production Outcomes in Holstein Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 102, 10129-10139. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16926
[44]
Fukumori, R., Shi, W., Oikawa, S. and Oba, M. (2021) Evaluation of Relationship between Ruminal pH and the Proportion of De Novo Fatty Acids in Milk. JDS Communications, 2, 123-126. https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2020-0042
[45]
Chowdhury, M.R., Wilkinson, R.G. and Sinclair, L.A. (2024) Reducing Dietary Protein and Supplementation with Starch or Rumen-Protected Methionine and Its Effect on Performance and Nitrogen Efficiency in Dairy Cows Fed a Red Clover and Grass Silage-Based Diet. Journal of Dairy Science, 107, 3543-3557. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23987
[46]
Colmenero, J.J.O. and Broderick, G.A. (2006) Effect of Dietary Crude Protein Concentration on Milk Production and Nitrogen Utilization in Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1704-1712. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72238-x
[47]
Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Ameilbonne, A., Bichat, A., Mosoni, P., Ossa, F. and Forano, E. (2016) Live Yeasts Enhance Fibre Degradation in the Cow Rumen through an Increase in Plant Substrate Colonization by Fibrolytic Bacteria and Fungi. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 120, 560-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13005
[48]
Kowalik, B., Micha？owski, T., Paj？k, J., Taciak, M. and Zalewska, M. (2011) The Effect of Live Yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Their Metabolites on Ciliate Fauna, Fibrolytic and Amylolytic Activity, Carbohydrate Digestion and Fermentation in the Rumen of Goats. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 20, 526-536. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66206/2011
[49]
Elmetwaly, M.A., El-Sysy, M.A.I., Khalifa, H.H. and Safwat, M.A. (2022) Effect of Dietary Live Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Supplementation on Some Productive Traits and Methane Production of Lactating Buffaloes under Heat Stress. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 25, 135-147.
[50]
Tristant, D. and Moran, C.A. (2015) The Efficacy of Feeding a Live Probiotic Yeast, Yea-Sacc？, on the Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition, 3, e12.
