全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Nested Contexts of Quantum Understanding (NCQU) Framework: A Cyberpsychology Perspective on Quantum Cybersecurity Readiness and Organizational Adaptation

DOI: 10.4236/jqis.2026.163012, PP. 343-386

Keywords: Nested Contexts of Quantum Understanding, Quantum Cybersecurity, Cyberpsychology, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Q-Day Preparedness, Organizational Psychology, Technology Adoption, Professional Identity, Cognitive Biases, Sense-Making Theory

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The emergence of quantum computing presents unprecedented challenges for cybersecurity professionals and organizations, requiring fundamental reconceptualization of cryptographic security paradigms. Despite widespread technical awareness of quantum threats, organizational preparedness for post-quantum cryptography transitions remains inadequate, suggesting that barriers to quantum adaptation extend beyond purely technical domains into psychological and organizational territories. This article introduces the Nested Contexts of Quantum Understanding (NCQU) Framework, a comprehensive theoretical model that integrates cyberpsychology principles with quantum cybersecurity implementation challenges. The NCQU Framework conceptualizes quantum understanding as an emergent phenomenon arising from the dynamic interaction of individual, social, and organizational dimensions operating across temporal, epistemological, and phenomenological spectrums. Through theoretically directed synthesis of research on cognitive biases, professional identity challenges, organizational sense-making processes, and uncertainty tolerance mechanisms, this research illuminates psychological barriers impeding quantum cybersecurity adoption despite available post-quantum cryptographic standards. The framework identifies critical factors including temporal discounting of future quantum threats, expertise entrenchment among classical cryptographers, ambiguity aversion toward quantum-resistant solutions, and organizational culture dynamics that systematically undermine Q-Day preparedness. Drawing on Weick’s sense-making theory, technology acceptance models, and cyberpsychology research on human-technology interaction, the NCQU Framework provides diagnostic capabilities for identifying specific barriers to quantum adoption and targeting interventions across individual, social, and organizational levels. Practical implications emphasize the necessity of integrating psychological readiness with technical implementations, including metacognitive training for paradigm flexibility, scenario-based planning to counteract temporal discounting, professional identity adaptation support, and organizational psychological safety protocols enabling productive engagement with quantum uncertainty. This research contributes to emerging understanding of quantum cybersecurity transitions as fundamentally socio-technical challenges requiring coordinated attention to cognitive, affective, social, and organizational factors alongside cryptographic algorithm selection and implementation capabilities.

References

[1]  Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., et al. (2022) Status Report on the Third Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), 8309.
[2]  Bindel, N., Herath, U., McKague, M. and Stebila, D. (2017) Transitioning to a Quantum-Resistant Public Key Infrastructure. In: Lange, T. and Takagi, T., Eds., International Workshop on Post-Quantum Cryptography, Springer International Publishing, 384-405.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59879-6_22
[3]  Mosca, M. (2018) Cybersecurity in an Era with Quantum Computers: Will We Be Ready? IEEE Security & Privacy, 16, 38-41.
https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2018.3761723
[4]  Shor, P.W. (1994) Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring. Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Santa Fe, 20-22 November 1994, 124-134.
https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700
[5]  Ayanbode, T., Sahani, Y., Srinivasan, K., Kim, D.J. and Kang, K. (2024) Temporal Discounting in Quantum Security: An Experimental Investigation of Cybersecurity Professionals’ Responses to Future Quantum Threats. Computers & Security, 137, Article ID: 103614.
[6]  Possati, L.M. (2024) Quantum Computing and Organizational Mindfulness: Pre-Paring for Paradigm Shifts in Cybersecurity. Technology in Society, 77, Article ID: 102547.
[7]  National Institute of Standards and Technology (2024) Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization: Announcing Four Candidate Algorithms.
https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography
[8]  Csenkey, B. and Bindel, N. (2023) Post-Quantum Cryptography: Current State and Quantum Mitigation. 2023 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops, Delft, 3-7 July 2023, 620-628.
[9]  Joseph, D., Misoczki, R., Manzano, M., Tricot, J., Pinuaga, F.D., Lacombe, O., et al. (2022) Transitioning Organizations to Post-Quantum Cryptography. Nature, 605, 237-243.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04623-2
[10]  Iqbal, W., Abbas, H., Daneshmand, M., Rauf, B. and Bangash, Y.A. (2025) Profiling Post-Quantum Cryptography for IoT Security: A Software Engineering Approach. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 12, 1158-1177.
[11]  Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2010) Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
[12]  Attrill-Smith, A., Fullwood, C., Keep, M. and Kuss, D.J. (2019) The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press.
[13]  Nobles, C. (2018) Botching Human Factors in Cybersecurity in Business Organizations. Holistica—Journal of Business and Public Administration, 9, 71-88.
https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0024
[14]  Sozzo, S. (2021) Quantum Cognition and Decision Theories: A Tutorial. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 104, Article ID: 102579.
[15]  Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2010) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[16]  Montanaro, A. (2016) Quantum Algorithms: An Overview. NPJ Quantum Information, 2, Article No. 15023.
https://doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2015.23
[17]  Bernstein, D.J. and Lange, T. (2017) Post-Quantum Cryptography. Nature, 549, 188-194.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23461
[18]  Preskill, J. (2018) Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era and Beyond. Quantum, 2, Article No. 79.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
[19]  Aydeger, A., Sarica, A.K., Behnia, R., Cebe, M., Akkaya, K. and Rahman, M.A. (2024) Mitigating Quantum Threats to Blockchain and Cyber-Security: Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Post-Quantum Blockchain and Cryptographic Standards. IEEE Access, 12, 23345-23371.
[20]  Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of Risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
[21]  Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’donoghue, T. (2002) Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
[22]  Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
[23]  Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[24]  Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[25]  Weick, K.E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications.
[26]  Schein, E.H. (2010) Organizational Culture and Leadership. 4th Edition, Jossey-Bass.
[27]  Weick, K.E. and Sutcliffe, K.M. (2015) Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. 3rd Edition, Wiley.
[28]  Ibarra, H. (1999) Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
[29]  Hatano, G. and Inagaki, K. (1986) Two Courses of Expertise. In: Stevenson, H., Azuma, H. and Hakuta, K., Eds., Child Development and Education in Japan, Freeman, 262-272.
[30]  Teitsma, M., Pors, J., Lucivero, F. and Swierstra, T. (2025) Professional Resistance to Emerging Technologies: Exploring the Expertise Paradox in Quantum Security Transitions. Science and Public Policy, 52, 78-92.
[31]  Ibarra, H. and Barbulescu, R. (2010) Identity as Narrative: Prevalence, Effectiveness, and Consequences of Narrative Identity Work in Macro Work Role Transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35, 135-154.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.45577925
[32]  Wickens, C.D., Helton, W.S., Hollands, J.G. and Banbury, S. (2021) Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 5th Edition, Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003177616
[33]  Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
[34]  Barik, T., Denning, T., Pearson, J., Nushi, B. and Dittmer, T. (2021). Understanding Quantum Software Engineering. Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results, 25-28 May 2021, 40-44.
[35]  Lee, J.D. and See, K.A. (2004) Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 50-80.
https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
[36]  Aiken, M. (2016) The Cyber Effect: A Pioneering Cyberpsychologist Explains How Human Behavior Changes Online. Spiegel & Grau.
[37]  Hillen, M.A., Gutheil, C.M., Strout, T.D., Smets, E.M.A. and Han, P.K.J. (2017) Tolerance of Uncertainty: Conceptual Analysis, Integrative Model, and Implications for Healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 62-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024
[38]  Piaget, J. (1952) The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.
[39]  Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803932
[40]  Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday.
[41]  Walsh, R. (1995) Phenomenological Mapping: A Method for Describing and Com-paring States of Consciousness. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 27, 25-25.
https://drrogerwalsh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Phenomenological-Mappping-A-Method-for-Describing-Comparing-States-of-Consciousness-JTP-1995.pdf
[42]  Salehi, ?., Seskir, Z. and Tepe, ?. (2022) A Computer Science-Oriented Approach to Introduce Quantum Computing to a New Audience. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2021.3078552

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133