全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Response of the Bacterial Consortium under Supersaturation Conditions in an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Environment between Typha domingensis and Bovine Manure

DOI: 10.4236/jsbs.2026.162002, PP. 29-43

Keywords: Typha domingensis, Oxidation-Reduction Potential, Salinity, Conductivity, Supersaturated, Density

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Oversaturation in an anaerobic co-digestion environment occurs when two substrates with different bulk densities are used. In this case, the co-substrate with the higher bulk density has its ratio gradually increased without changing the water supply initially, while the ratio of the second co-substrate is decreased. In our case study, the ratio of Typha domingensis, which has a higher density than cattle manure, will gradually increase from 10% to 50%, the point at which the anaerobic environment becomes supersaturated. Since the optimum pH is between 6.1 and 7.1, the system’s temperature is dependent on the ambient temperature with a temporary variation between 28 and 36 degrees Celsius. This necessitates examining other parameters of the reaction medium that could explain this phenomenon. The relevant parameters are salinity, conductivity, and oxidation-reduction potential. The limit values obtained for these parameters are [2.4; 4.5 mS and 35.2 mV], respectively. This led us to question the performance of the overall process in terms of biogas composition, achieving a maximum CH4 concentration of 55.59%.

References

[1]  Bouchez, T. and Moletta, R. (2008) L’élimination et la méthanisation des déchets non dangereux en installation de stockage. La Méthanisation, 2nd Edition, 297.
[2]  Lin, Q., De Vrieze, J., Li, J. and Li, X. (2016) Temperature Affects Microbial Abundance, Activity and Interactions in Anaerobic Digestion. Bioresource Technology, 209, 228-236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.132
[3]  Venkiteshwaran, K., Bocher, B., Maki, J. and Zitomer, D. (2015) Relating Anaerobic Digestion Microbial Community and Process Function: Supplementary Issue: Water Microbiology. Microbiology Insights, 8, 37-48.
[4]  Vanwonterghem, I., Jensen, P.D., Ho, D.P., Batstone, D.J. and Tyson, G.W. (2014) Linking Microbial Community Structure, Interactions and Function in Anaerobic Digesters Using New Molecular Techniques. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 27, 55-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.004
[5]  Wu, L., Yang, Y., Chen, S., Zhao, M., Zhu, Z., Yang, S., et al. (2016) Long-Term Successional Dynamics of Microbial Association Networks in Anaerobic Digestion Processes. Water Research, 104, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.072
[6]  Mutungwazi, A., Ijoma, G.N. and Matambo, T.S. (2020) The Significance of Microbial Community Functions and Symbiosis in Enhancing Methane Production during Anaerobic Digestion: A Review. Symbiosis, 83, 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-020-00734-4
[7]  Senghor, M.N., Bassama, J., Ly, E.B., Mora, F. and Galaffu, N. (2024) Typha domingensis and Phragmites Australis as Alternative and Sustainable Pulp Materials for Primary Paper Based Packaging. Bioresource Technology Reports, 25, Article 101712.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101712
[8]  Whitman, W.B., Bowen, T.L. and Boone, D.R. (2006) The Methanogenic Bacteria. In: Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, KH. and Stackebrandt, E., Eds., The Prokaryotes, Springer, 165-207.
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30743-5_9
[9]  Barbier, J. (2017) Extrêmes climatiques-les vagues de chaleur au printemps sahélien. Doctoral Dissertation, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse-INPT.
[10]  Lettinga, G., Rebac, S. and Zeeman, G. (2001) Challenge of Psychrophilic Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment. Trends in Biotechnology, 19, 363-370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(01)01701-2
[11]  Vongvichiankul, C., Deebao, J. and Khongnakorn, W. (2017) Relationship between pH, Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) and Biogas Production in Mesophilic Screw Anaerobic Digester. Energy Procedia, 138, 877-882.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.113
[12]  Zhang, J., Zhang, R., He, Q., Ji, B., Wang, H. and Yang, K. (2020) Adaptation to Salinity: Response of Biogas Production and Microbial Communities in Anaerobic Digestion of Kitchen Waste to Salinity Stress. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 130, 173-178.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.11.011
[13]  Feijoo, G., Soto, M., Méndez, R. and Lema, J.M. (1995) Sodium Inhibition in the Anaerobic Digestion Process: Antagonism and Adaptation Phenomena. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 17, 180-188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(94)00011-f

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133