The Varthur Catchment area lies in the southern part of Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka, between 12？48'24.52\"N to 12？53'59.85\"N and 77？24'59.95\"E to 77？30'6.72\"E, covering an area of 284 km2. Drainage characteristics were extracted from SRTM DEM and IRS P6 LISS III imagery using ArcGIS 10.2.2, and the catchment was delineated into ten sub-watersheds. The catchment is a 5th-order basin with a dendritic drainage pattern. The mean bifurcation ratio is 3.1, total stream length is 327 km, and mean drainage density is 1.31 km/km2, indicating moderate permeability. The elongation ratio (0.064) and circularity ratio (0.53) reflect a structurally controlled, elongated basin. Hypsometric analysis yields an integral of 0.46, placing the basin in the mature stage of geomorphic development, with about 54% of the original landmass already eroded. Sub-watershed prioritisation using the composite parameter method identifies SWS-1 and SWS-7 as high-priority zones requiring urgent soil conservation measures and SWS-2, SWS-3, SWS-4, SWS-5, SWS-6, SWS-9, and SWS-10 are classified as moderate priority, indicating moderate infiltration capacity, while SWS-8 shows the lowest erosion risk. The findings provide a baseline for watershed management and sustainable land- and water-resource planning.
References
[1]
Horton, R.E. (1945) Erosional Development of Streams and Their Drainage Basins; Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275-370. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:edosat]2.0.co;2
[2]
Borah, H. (2020) Morphometric Analysis for Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds of Jamuna River Watershed, Assam, India Using Remote Sensing and GIS Technique. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13, 18-26. https://www.academia.edu/43316382/Morphometric_Analysis_for_Prioritization_of_Sub_Watersheds_of_Jamuna_River_Watershed_Assam_India_Using_Remote_Sensing_and_GIS_Technique
[3]
Raja Shekar, P. and Mathew, A. (2024) Morphometric Analysis of Watersheds: A Comprehensive Review of Data Sources, Quality, and Geospatial Techniques. Watershed Ecology and the Environment, 6, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2023.12.001
[4]
Javed, A., Khanday, M.Y. and Ahmed, R. (2009) Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds Based on Morphometric and Land Use Analysis Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-009-0016-8
[5]
Basappa Reddy, M. (2003) Status of Groundwater Quality in Bangalore and Its Environs. https://prod-qt-images.s3.amazonaws.com/indiawaterportal/import/sites/default/files/iwp2/GWQualityComplete.pdf
[6]
Sreedevi, P.D., Subrahmanyam, K. and Ahmed, S. (2004) The Significance of Morphometric Analysis for Obtaining Groundwater Potential Zones in a Structurally Controlled Terrain. Environmental Geology, 47, 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1166-1
[7]
Strahler, A.N. (1964) Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks. In: Chow, V.T., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, 4.39-4.76.
[8]
Schumm, S.A. (1956) Evolution of Drainage Systems and Slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 597-646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:eodsas]2.0.co;2
[9]
Pareta, K. and Pareta, U. (2011) Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of a Watershed of Yamuna Basin, India Using ASTER (DEM) Data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2, 248-269.
[10]
Nag, S. (1998) Morphometric Analysis Using Remote Sensing Techniques in the Chaka Sub-Basin, Purulia District, West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 26, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03007341
[11]
Singh, S. and Singh, M.C. (1997) Morphometric Analysis of Kanhar River Basin. National Geographical Journal of India, 43, 31-43.
[12]
Howard, A.D. (1967) Drainage Analysis in Geologic Interpretation: A Summation. AAPG Bulletin, 51, 2246-2259. https://doi.org/10.1306/5d25c26d-16c1-11d7-8645000102c1865d
Smith, K.G. (1950) Standards for Grading Texture of Erosional Topography. American Journal of Science, 248, 655-668. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.248.9.655
[15]
Nautiyal, M.D. (1994) Morphometric Analysis of a Drainage Basin Using Aerial Photographs: A Case Study of Khairkuli Basin, District Dehradun, U.P. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 22, 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03026526
[16]
Smith, G. (1935) The Relative Relief of Ohio. Geographical Review, 25, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/209602
[17]
Hadley, R.F. and Schumm, S.A. (1961) Sediment Sources and Drainage Basin Characteristics in Upper Cheyenne River Basin. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1531-B, 137-198.
[18]
Strahler, A.N. (1956) Quantitative Slope Analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 571-596. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[571:qsa]2.0.co;2
