The article presents results of an analysis including cyber ethnography, discourse and critical discourse analyses as tools for revealing the ways in which the Strandzha brand is presented. The object of research is Strandzha, it is a unique region with a rich cultural, historical, and mythological heritage in Bulgaria. The hypothesis is that the Strandzha brand is multifaceted, heterogeneous, and evolving as a result of the interpretation of its historical, cultural, and mythological heritage, and this requires new approaches and techniques for its reconceptualization and promotion using digital tools, through the creation of partnerships and networks, and its positioning from the regional to the national level, and from there as a contribution to the creative industry in Bulgaria, the region, and Europe. Opportunities have been identified for using brand journalism, podcasts, and social networks to promote the brand through content creation with digital tools and artificial intelligence. Steps are proposed for developing a communication campaign to build and promote the Strandzha brand in Bulgarian media ecosystem and virtual environment through digital marketing and public relations. Opportunities for changing the paradigm when presenting the Strandzha brand in a communication campaign are described too.
References
[1]
Ardévol, E., & Gómez-Cruz, E. (2014). Digital Ethnography and Media Practices. In TheInternationalEncyclopediaofMediaStudies, FirstEdition.VolumeVII:ResearchMethodsinMediaStudies (pp. 1-21). Wiley.
[2]
Akturan, U. (2009). A Review of Cyber Ethnographic Research: A Research Technique to Analyze Virtual Consumer Communities. Bogazici Journal, 23, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21773/boun.23.1.1
[3]
Desai, D. M. V. (2019). Digital Marketing: A Review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Special Issue, 10, 196-200. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd23100
[4]
Dimitrova, T. (2020). AnInnovative Approach toCreatingandManaging the Brand“Bulgaria”andtheBrand“Sofia”. Dissertation, Faculty of Economics, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”.
[5]
Fol, A. (1978). The Thracian Heritage of Strandzha, Scientific Research Program “Strandzha–Sakar”, FirstInterdisciplinarySymposium“Strandzha”. Central Academy of Sciences.
[6]
Fol, V. (2000). FireandMusic. Marin Drinov Publishing House of BAS.
[7]
Hine, C. (2017). Ethnographies of Online Communities and Social Media: Modes, Varieties, Affordances. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, G. Blank, & C. Hine (Eds.), TheSAGEHandbookofOnlineResearchMethods (pp. 401-413). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992.n23
[8]
Holliman, R. (2011). Telling Science Stories in an Evolving Digital Media Ecosystem: From Communication to Conversation and Confrontation. Journal of Science Communication, 10, C04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040304
[9]
Karayotov, I. (1980) Strandzha and the Sea in a Cultural-Historical Aspect, Scientific Research Program “Strandzha–Sakar”. In FirstInterdisciplinarySymposium“Strandzha” (pp. 65-69). Central Academy of Sciences.
[10]
Kau, E. (2006). Regional Branding: A Relationship of Public and Private Sectors. Department of Marketing. UW-LJournalofUndergraduateResearch, 11, 1-6.
[11]
Keeley-Browne, E. (2011). Cyber-Ethnography: The Emerging Research Approach for 21st Century Research Investigation. In G. Kurubacak, & T. Yuzer (Eds.), HandbookofResearchonTransformativeOnlineEducationandLiberation:ModelsforSocialEquality (pp. 330-338). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-046-4.ch017
[12]
Lopez, A. (2012). TheMediaEcosystem.WhatEcologyCanTeachUsaboutResponsible.MediaPractice. Evolver Editions.
[13]
Lunceford, B. (2015). Rhetorical Autoethnography. JournalofContemporaryRhetoric,5, 1-20.
[14]
Margarisová, K., & Vokacova, L. (2016). Regional Branding: Building Brand Value. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et SilviculturaeMendelianaeBrunensis, 64, 2059-2066. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664062059
[15]
Murthy, D. (2008). Digital Ethnograph: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Sociology,42, 837-855.
[16]
Murthy, D. (2011). Emergent Digital Ethnographic Methods for Social Research. In: S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), HandbookofEmergentTechnologiesinSocialResearch (pp. 158-179). Oxford University Press.
[17]
Negru？a, A. L., & Coro？, M. M. (2008). Theoretical Aspects Concerning National and Regional Branding Issues. In Studiisicercetarieconomice (pp. 194-204). Alma Mater.
[18]
Oprea, D. (2019). Discourse Analysis in Social Media. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education, 3, 315-320. https://doi.org/10.26520/mcdsare.2019.3.315-320
[19]
Peters, L. (2021). Social Media Ethnographic Methods. The Virtual World, Real-Life Pandemic Disease and the Ethnographer. Newmedia21. https://www.newmedia21.eu/analizi/social-media-ethnographic-methods-the-virtual-world-real-life-pandemic-disease-and-the-ethnographer/
[20]
Petrov, M. (2005). ThePersonalImage.Construction.Control.Reception. Atlantis Media.
[21]
Rybas, N., & Gajjala, R. (2007). Developing Cyberethnographic Research Methods for Understanding Digitally Mediated Identities. Forum:QualitativeSocialResearch,8, Article 35. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Developing-Cyberethnographic-Research-Methods-for-Rybas-Gajjala/b6f4c5fa4ac800bae3092e4d075a88faf326b7e0
[22]
Serezliev, S. (2014). IntegratedMarketing Communications,BrandandGraphic Design: BetweenDefinitionsandPerspectives. Vanio Nedkov.
[23]
Serezliev, S. (2024). TheActor’sPersonal Brand: Between DefinitionsandPerspectives. Institute of Rhetoric and Communications.
[24]
Shimul, A. S., Faroque, A. R., & Quader, E. (2025). Brand Advocacy: A Scoping Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 35, 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-10-2024-5537
[25]
Rao, Y., Idris, M. Z., Sun, J. C. et al. (2023). Brand Equity and Brand Personality: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 12, 375-385. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v12-i4/20092
[26]
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, Context and Cognition. Discourse Studies, 8, 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565
[27]
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), TheHandbookofDiscourseAnalysis (pp. 466-485). Wiley-Blackwell.
[28]
Zuckerman, E. (2021). Why Study Media Ecosystems? Information, Communication & Society, 24, 1495-1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1942513
