We introduce a configuration-dependent parametrisation of coherence in Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment based on the complex quantity
. The real component
retains its usual causal role, while the imaginary component
encodes the attenuation of coherence without representing a physical time coordinate or an additional degree of freedom. Different interferometric configurations correspond to different decompositions of
, effectively acting as an internal rotation that modifies the imaginary-time difference between paths and therefore the visibility. This mechanism alters coherence without affecting causal evolution and does not require retrocausality. The construction is fully compatible with standard quantum mechanics: it preserves unitary evolution, the Born rule, and the structure of completely positive trace-preserving (CP-TP) maps, and is equivalent to a standard dephasing channel written in a compact parametrised form. The framework yields experimentally testable predictions for visibility modulation and temporal correlations, including a temporal CHSH protocol that departs from classical bounds through the configuration dependence of
rather than through any modification of the underlying dynamics.
References
[1]
Wheeler, J.A. (1978) The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment. In: Marlow, A.R., Ed., MathematicalFoundationsofQuantumTheory, Elsevier, 9-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-473250-6.50006-6
[2]
Wheeler, J.A. (1984) Law Without Law. In: Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H., Eds., Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, 182-213.
[3]
Ellerman, D. (2015) The Logic of Partitions: Introduction to the Dual of the Logic of Subsets. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 23, 1-23.
[4]
Zurek, W.H. (2003) Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical. ReviewsofModernPhysics, 75, 715-775. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.715
[5]
Joos, E., Zeh, H.D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J. and Stamatescu, I.-O. (2003) Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. 2nd Edition, Springer.
[6]
Schlosshauer, M. (2007) Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Springer.
Simon, B. (1983) Holonomy, the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, and Berry’s Phase. PhysicalReviewLetters, 51, 2167-2170. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.51.2167
[9]
Aharonov, Y. and Anandan, J. (1987) Phase Change during a Cyclic Quantum Evolution. PhysicalReviewLetters, 58, 1593-1596. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.58.1593
Garrison, J.C. and Wright, E.M. (2012) Complex Time Path Integrals and Quantum Evolution. Physics Letters A, 376, 1233-1237.
[12]
Yamamoto, K., Nakagawa, M., Adachi, K., Takasan, K., Ueda, M. and Kawakami, N. (2019) Theory of Non-Hermitian Fermionic Superfluidity with a Complex-Valued Interaction. Physical Review Letters, 123, Article 123601. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.123.123601
[13]
Ashida, Y., Gong, Z. and Ueda, M. (2020) Non-Hermitian Physics. AdvancesinPhysics, 69, 249-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991
Schwinger, J. (1951) On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization. PhysicalReview, 82, 664-679. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.82.664
[16]
Gibbons, G.W. and Hawking, S.W. (1977) Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity. PhysicalReviewD, 15, 2752-2756. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.15.2752
[17]
Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (2009) The Two-State Vector Formalism: An Updated Review. In: Muga, J., Mayato, R.S. and Egusquiza, í., Eds., LectureNotesinPhysics, Springer, 399-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4_13
[18]
Page, D.N. and Wootters, W.K. (1983) Evolution without Evolution: Dynamics Described by Stationary Observables. PhysicalReviewD, 27, 2885-2892. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.27.2885
[19]
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D.Z. and Vaidman, L. (1988) How the Result of a Measurement of a Component of the Spin of a Spin-1/2 Particle Can Turn Out to Be 100. PhysicalReviewLetters, 60, 1351-1354. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.60.1351
[20]
Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (1990) Properties of a Quantum System during the Time Interval between Two Measurements. PhysicalReviewA, 41, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.41.11
[21]
Wharton, K. (2010) Time-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 40, 313-332.
[22]
Leggett, A.J. and Garg, A. (1985) Quantum Mechanics versus Macroscopic Realism: Is the Flux There When Nobody Looks? PhysicalReviewLetters, 54, 857-860. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.857
[23]
Brukner, ?., Taylor, S., Cheung, S. and Vedral, V. (2004) Quantum Entanglement in Time. arXiv:quant-ph/0402127. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402127
[24]
Leifer, M.S. and Spekkens, R.W. (2013) Towards a Formulation of Quantum Theory as a Causally Neutral Theory of Bayesian Inference. PhysicalReviewA, 88, Article 052130. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.052130
Griffiths, R.B. (1984) Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. JournalofStatisticalPhysics, 36, 219-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01015734
[27]
Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J.B. (1993) Classical Equations for Quantum Systems. PhysicalReviewD, 47, 3345-3382. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.47.3345
[28]
Halliwell, J.J. (2016) Leggett-Garg Inequalities and No-Signaling in Time: A Quasiprobability Approach. PhysicalReviewA, 93, Article 022123. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.022123
[29]
Price, H. (1996) Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Weinberg, S. (2015) Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316276105
[31]
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. PhysicalReviewLetters, 49, 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.49.91
[32]
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers. PhysicalReviewLetters, 49, 1804-1807. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804
[33]
Fritz, T. (2010) Quantum Correlations in the Temporal Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Scenario. New Journal of Physics, 12, Article 083055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083055
[34]
Quintino, M.T., Uola, R., Budroni, C. and Gühne, O. (2019) Inequivalence of Temporal and Spatial Quantum Correlations. Physical Review Letters, 123, Article 180401.
[35]
Costa, A.C.S., Uola, R. and Gühne, O. (2018) Steering Criteria from General Entropic Uncertainty Relations. Physical ReviewA, 98, Article 050102. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.98.050104
[36]
Sombillo, D.L. and Galapon, E.A. (2014) Quantum Traversal Time through a Double Barrier. PhysicalReviewA, 90, Article 032115. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.90.032115
[37]
Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A. and Holt, R.A. (1969) Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. PhysicalReviewLetters, 23, 880-884. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.23.880
[38]
Mostafazadeh, A. (2010) Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics. InternationalJournalofGeometricMethodsinModernPhysics, 7, 1191-1306. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219887810004816
[39]
Nakahara, M. (2003) Geometry, Topology and Physics. 2nd Edition, Taylor & Francis.
[40]
Frankel, T. (2011) The Geometry of Physics. 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139061377
[41]
Peruzzo, A., Shadbolt, P., Brunner, N., Popescu, S. and O’Brien, J.L. (2012) A Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment. Science, 338, 634-637. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226719
[42]
Ma, X.S., Kofler, J., Qarry, A., Tetik, N., Scheidl, T., Ursin, R., et al. (2013) Quantum Erasure with Causally Disconnected Choice. Proceedings of the National AcademyofSciences, 110, 1221-1226. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213201110
[43]
Vedovato, F., Agnesi, C., Schiavon, M., Dequal, D., Calderaro, L., Tomasin, M., et al. (2017) Extending Wheeler’s Delayed-Choice Experiment to Space. ScienceAdvances, 3, e1701180. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701180
[44]
Kaiser, F., Coudreau, T., Milman, P. and Tanzilli, S. (2020) Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment with Entanglement. Science Advances, 6, eaaz4204.
[45]
Budroni, C. and Emary, C. (2014) Temporal Quantum Correlations and Leggett-Garg Inequalities in Multilevel Systems. PhysicalReviewLetters, 113, Article 050401. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.050401
[46]
Kofler, J. and Brukner, ?. (2007) Classical World Arising Out of Quantum Physics under the Restriction of Coarse-Grained Measurements. PhysicalReviewLetters, 99, Article 180403. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.180403
[47]
Emary, C., Lambert, N. and Nori, F. (2014) Leggett-Garg Inequalities. ReportsonProgressinPhysics, 77, Article 016001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/1/016001