全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Configuration-Dependent Complex Time in Delayed-Choice Interferometry

DOI: 10.4236/jqis.2026.162010, PP. 252-282

Keywords: Delayed-Choice Experiment, Coherence, Imaginary Time, Dephasing, Temporal CHSH

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We introduce a configuration-dependent parametrisation of coherence in Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment based on the complex quantity T=t?iτ . The real component t retains its usual causal role, while the imaginary component τ encodes the attenuation of coherence without representing a physical time coordinate or an additional degree of freedom. Different interferometric configurations correspond to different decompositions of T , effectively acting as an internal rotation that modifies the imaginary-time difference between paths and therefore the visibility. This mechanism alters coherence without affecting causal evolution and does not require retrocausality. The construction is fully compatible with standard quantum mechanics: it preserves unitary evolution, the Born rule, and the structure of completely positive trace-preserving (CP-TP) maps, and is equivalent to a standard dephasing channel written in a compact parametrised form. The framework yields experimentally testable predictions for visibility modulation and temporal correlations, including a temporal CHSH protocol that departs from classical bounds through the configuration dependence of Δτ rather than through any modification of the underlying dynamics.

References

[1]  Wheeler, J.A. (1978) The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment. In: Marlow, A.R., Ed., Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, Elsevier, 9-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-473250-6.50006-6
[2]  Wheeler, J.A. (1984) Law Without Law. In: Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H., Eds., Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, 182-213.
[3]  Ellerman, D. (2015) The Logic of Partitions: Introduction to the Dual of the Logic of Subsets. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 23, 1-23.
[4]  Zurek, W.H. (2003) Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 715-775.
https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.715
[5]  Joos, E., Zeh, H.D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J. and Stamatescu, I.-O. (2003) Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. 2nd Edition, Springer.
[6]  Schlosshauer, M. (2007) Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Springer.
[7]  Berry, M.V. (1984) Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 392, 45-57.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1984.0023
[8]  Simon, B. (1983) Holonomy, the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, and Berry’s Phase. Physical Review Letters, 51, 2167-2170.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.51.2167
[9]  Aharonov, Y. and Anandan, J. (1987) Phase Change during a Cyclic Quantum Evolution. Physical Review Letters, 58, 1593-1596.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.58.1593
[10]  Brody, D.C. (2013) Biorthogonal Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47, Article 035305.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/3/035305
[11]  Garrison, J.C. and Wright, E.M. (2012) Complex Time Path Integrals and Quantum Evolution. Physics Letters A, 376, 1233-1237.
[12]  Yamamoto, K., Nakagawa, M., Adachi, K., Takasan, K., Ueda, M. and Kawakami, N. (2019) Theory of Non-Hermitian Fermionic Superfluidity with a Complex-Valued Interaction. Physical Review Letters, 123, Article 123601.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.123.123601
[13]  Ashida, Y., Gong, Z. and Ueda, M. (2020) Non-Hermitian Physics. Advances in Physics, 69, 249-435.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991
[14]  Wick, G.C. (1954) Properties of Bethe-Salpeter Wave Functions. Physical Review, 96, 1124-1134.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.96.1124
[15]  Schwinger, J. (1951) On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization. Physical Review, 82, 664-679.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.82.664
[16]  Gibbons, G.W. and Hawking, S.W. (1977) Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity. Physical Review D, 15, 2752-2756.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.15.2752
[17]  Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (2009) The Two-State Vector Formalism: An Updated Review. In: Muga, J., Mayato, R.S. and Egusquiza, í., Eds., Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, 399-447.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4_13
[18]  Page, D.N. and Wootters, W.K. (1983) Evolution without Evolution: Dynamics Described by Stationary Observables. Physical Review D, 27, 2885-2892.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.27.2885
[19]  Aharonov, Y., Albert, D.Z. and Vaidman, L. (1988) How the Result of a Measurement of a Component of the Spin of a Spin-1/2 Particle Can Turn Out to Be 100. Physical Review Letters, 60, 1351-1354.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.60.1351
[20]  Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (1990) Properties of a Quantum System during the Time Interval between Two Measurements. Physical Review A, 41, 11-20.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.41.11
[21]  Wharton, K. (2010) Time-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 40, 313-332.
[22]  Leggett, A.J. and Garg, A. (1985) Quantum Mechanics versus Macroscopic Realism: Is the Flux There When Nobody Looks? Physical Review Letters, 54, 857-860.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.857
[23]  Brukner, ?., Taylor, S., Cheung, S. and Vedral, V. (2004) Quantum Entanglement in Time. arXiv:quant-ph/0402127.
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402127
[24]  Leifer, M.S. and Spekkens, R.W. (2013) Towards a Formulation of Quantum Theory as a Causally Neutral Theory of Bayesian Inference. Physical Review A, 88, Article 052130.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.052130
[25]  Brukner, ?. (2014) Quantum Causality. Nature Physics, 10, 259-263.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2930
[26]  Griffiths, R.B. (1984) Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 36, 219-272.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01015734
[27]  Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J.B. (1993) Classical Equations for Quantum Systems. Physical Review D, 47, 3345-3382.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.47.3345
[28]  Halliwell, J.J. (2016) Leggett-Garg Inequalities and No-Signaling in Time: A Quasiprobability Approach. Physical Review A, 93, Article 022123.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.022123
[29]  Price, H. (1996) Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford University Press.
[30]  Weinberg, S. (2015) Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316276105
[31]  Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49, 91-94.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.49.91
[32]  Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49, 1804-1807.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804
[33]  Fritz, T. (2010) Quantum Correlations in the Temporal Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Scenario. New Journal of Physics, 12, Article 083055.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083055
[34]  Quintino, M.T., Uola, R., Budroni, C. and Gühne, O. (2019) Inequivalence of Temporal and Spatial Quantum Correlations. Physical Review Letters, 123, Article 180401.
[35]  Costa, A.C.S., Uola, R. and Gühne, O. (2018) Steering Criteria from General Entropic Uncertainty Relations. Physical Review A, 98, Article 050102.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.98.050104
[36]  Sombillo, D.L. and Galapon, E.A. (2014) Quantum Traversal Time through a Double Barrier. Physical Review A, 90, Article 032115.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.90.032115
[37]  Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A. and Holt, R.A. (1969) Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Physical Review Letters, 23, 880-884.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.23.880
[38]  Mostafazadeh, A. (2010) Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 7, 1191-1306.
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219887810004816
[39]  Nakahara, M. (2003) Geometry, Topology and Physics. 2nd Edition, Taylor & Francis.
[40]  Frankel, T. (2011) The Geometry of Physics. 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139061377
[41]  Peruzzo, A., Shadbolt, P., Brunner, N., Popescu, S. and O’Brien, J.L. (2012) A Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment. Science, 338, 634-637.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226719
[42]  Ma, X.S., Kofler, J., Qarry, A., Tetik, N., Scheidl, T., Ursin, R., et al. (2013) Quantum Erasure with Causally Disconnected Choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 1221-1226.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213201110
[43]  Vedovato, F., Agnesi, C., Schiavon, M., Dequal, D., Calderaro, L., Tomasin, M., et al. (2017) Extending Wheeler’s Delayed-Choice Experiment to Space. Science Advances, 3, e1701180.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701180
[44]  Kaiser, F., Coudreau, T., Milman, P. and Tanzilli, S. (2020) Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment with Entanglement. Science Advances, 6, eaaz4204.
[45]  Budroni, C. and Emary, C. (2014) Temporal Quantum Correlations and Leggett-Garg Inequalities in Multilevel Systems. Physical Review Letters, 113, Article 050401.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.050401
[46]  Kofler, J. and Brukner, ?. (2007) Classical World Arising Out of Quantum Physics under the Restriction of Coarse-Grained Measurements. Physical Review Letters, 99, Article 180403.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.180403
[47]  Emary, C., Lambert, N. and Nori, F. (2014) Leggett-Garg Inequalities. Reports on Progress in Physics, 77, Article 016001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/1/016001

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133