全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Training and Organizational Performance in Kenya’s National Government State Departments: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2026.166030, PP. 560-586

Keywords: Training, Organisational Performance, Public Sector, State Departments, Mixed Methods, Kenya

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study examined the relationship between training and organisational performance in Kenya’s national government state departments using a cross-sectional mixed-methods design. The quantitative strand used questionnaire data from 426 valid responses drawn from 21 state departments and allocation units domiciled in Nairobi, while the qualitative strand used one open-ended item to explain how training practices were experienced by public officers. Training was measured through seven indicators (T1 to T7) covering needs assessment (T1), induction and orientation (T2), training relevance (T3), equitable access (T4), post-training support (T5), evaluation of training outcomes (T6), and contribution to competence and day-to-day work quality (T7). Organisational performance was measured through six indicators: efficiency (OP1), effectiveness (OP2), service quality (OP3), innovation (OP4), accountability (OP5), and transparency (OP6). Descriptive findings showed that training and organisational performance were rated at moderate levels overall. The strongest training dimension was contribution to competence and work quality, while equitable access and post-training support were the weakest. Thematic findings showed that training was most likely to improve performance when it was needs-based, job-relevant, fairly distributed across cadres, supported after delivery, and monitored through simple outcome measures. Correlation analysis showed a moderate positive relationship between training and organisational performance (r = 0.480, p < 0.001). In the final multiple regression model, training remained a positive and statistically significant predictor of organisational performance after controlling for career development, knowledge management, organisational development, and employee motivation (B = 0.122, beta = 0.132, robust SE = 0.054, p = 0.024). The final model explained 38.1% of the variance in organisational performance (R2 = 0.381, adjusted R2 = 0.374, F(5, 420) = 51.70, p < 0.001). The study concludes that training is a credible but implementation-sensitive driver of performance in Kenya’s national government state departments.

References

[1]  Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451-474.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505
[2]  Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544-560.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671
[3]  Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Prasad, J. (2018). Transfer of Training: The Known and the Unknown. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 201-225.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104443
[4]  Garavan, T. N. (2007). A Strategic Perspective on Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 11-30.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306294492
[5]  Jacobs, R. L., & Washington, C. (2003). Employee Development and Organizational Performance: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research. Human Resource Development International, 6, 343-354.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110096211
[6]  Kehoe, R. R., & Wright, P. M. (2013). The Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Management, 39, 366-391.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365901
[7]  McGraw, P. (2014). A Review of Human Resource Development Trends and Practices in Australia: Multinationals, Locals, and Responses to Economic Turbulence. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16, 92-107.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313509572
[8]  Nguyen, H. T. T. (2019). Towards Human Resource Development at Hanoi Open University. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13, 223-235.
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-12-2018-0031
[9]  Potnuru, R. K. G., & Sahoo, C. K. (2016). HRD Interventions, Employee Competencies and Organizational Effectiveness: An Empirical Study. European Journal of Training and Development, 40, 345-365.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-02-2016-0008
[10]  Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2014). Do Organizations Spend Wisely on Employees? Effects of Training and Development Investments on Learning and Innovation in Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 393-412.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1897
[11]  Swanson, R. A. (2001). Human Resource Development and Its Underlying Theory. Human Resource Development International, 4, 299-312.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110059311

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133