全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多无人机投放下沉烟幕云团的时空覆盖最大化
Maximising the Spatiotemporal Coverage of a Descending Smoke Cloud Deployed by Multiple Drones

DOI: 10.12677/orf.2026.163022, PP. 16-28

Keywords: 多无人机协同,烟幕遮蔽,时空覆盖优化,三维几何判定,分层优化,鲁棒性评估
Multi-UAV Coordination
, Smoke Screening, Spatiotemporal Coverage Optimisation, Three-Dimensional Geometry Determination, Hierarchical Optimisation, Robustness Evaluation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对传统烟幕在精确打击防御中遮蔽时间短、协同效率低的问题,本文提出多无人机协同投放下沉烟幕云团优化方法,旨在最大化地面固定目标时空遮蔽收益。研究建立了包含导弹、无人机、烟幕弹及下沉云团的统一运动学模型,并综合均匀风场漂移、无人机最小转弯半径及导弹末段比例导引等约束,基于可见立体角设计了三维几何遮蔽准则。基于此,构建了“连续动作生成–鲁棒组合选择”分层优化框架,结合CMA-ES、增量式贪心算法与局部修复机制,实现了多机多弹协同投放优化。实验结果表明,优化方案在单机一弹、单机三弹、三机协同及五机多弹场景下,有效遮蔽时长分别达4.2 s、7.2 s、10.44 s和19.2 s,显著优于传统策略。蒙特卡洛评估揭示:小规模场景中引入鲁棒性可有效改善方案稳定性;然而,大规模时序拼接场景中,名义最优方案表现出明显脆弱性(外样本均值3.247 s,门槛可靠度0),即使鲁棒设计,可靠度也仅提升至0.017。因此,多机协同烟幕遮蔽任务的优化必须在设计阶段充分考虑外界扰动,以兼顾遮蔽性能最大化与系统执行稳定性。
This paper studies a coordinated optimisation method for deploying sinking smoke clouds with multiple UAVs to maximise the spatiotemporal concealment of a fixed ground target against precision-guided threats. A unified kinematic model is established for missiles, UAVs, smoke grenades and sinking smoke clouds, with additional consideration of uniform wind drift, UAV minimum-turn-radius constraints and a terminal proportional-guidance extension for missiles. A three-dimensional geometric screening criterion is then developed based on the visible solid angle of the target from the missile perspective. To solve the resulting continuous-discrete coupled optimisation problem, a hierarchical framework of continuous action generation and robust combinational selection is proposed. The continuous layer uses CMA-ES to generate candidate actions, while the combinational layer employs incremental greedy selection with local repair. Numerical results show that the nominal effective screening durations in the single-UAV single-smoke, single-UAV three-smoke, three-UAV cooperative and five-UAV multi-smoke scenarios reach 4.2 s, 7.2 s, 10.44 s and 19.2 s, respectively, significantly outperforming fixed and random strategies. Monte Carlo evaluation reveals that introducing robustness can effectively improve plan stability in small-scale scenarios; however, in large-scale temporal stitching scenarios, the nominally optimal plan exhibits significant fragility (out-of-sample mean 3.247 s, threshold reliability 0), and even with robust design, reliability only increases to 0.017. Therefore, the optimisation of multi-drone collaborative smoke-screening tasks must fully consider external disturbances during the design stage to balance maximal screening performance with system execution stability.

References

[1]  Sun, W.J., Gao, Q.H., Zhang, J.Z., et al. (2023) Aerosol Infrared Stealth Technology: Theory and Development of Infrared Suppression and Particle Dispersion in Aircraft Plume. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 39, Article ID: 101695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101695
[2]  Li, H., Wen, S., Li, S., Wang, H., Geng, X., Wang, S., et al. (2024) The Research on Infrared Radiation Affected by Smoke or Fog in Different Environmental Temperatures. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 14410.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65462-x
[3]  Song, J., Zhao, K. and Liu, Y. (2023) Survey on Mission Planning of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Aerospace, 10, Article No. 208.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10030208
[4]  Skaltsis, G.M., Shin, H.S. and Tsourdos, A. (2023) A Review of Task Allocation Methods for UAVs. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 109, Article No. 76.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-023-02011-0
[5]  Ghauri, S.A., Sarfraz, M., Qamar, R.A., Sohail, M.F. and Khan, S.A. (2024) A Review of Multi-UAV Task Allocation Algorithms for a Search and Rescue Scenario. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 13, Article No. 47.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan13050047
[6]  Alqefari, S. and Menai, M.E.B. (2025) Multi-UAV Task Assignment in Dynamic Environments: Current Trends and Future Directions. Drones, 9, Article No. 75.
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9010075
[7]  Qamar, R.A., Sarfraz, M., Rahman, A. and Ghauri, S.A. (2023) Multi-Criterion Multi-UAV Task Allocation under Dynamic Conditions. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 35, Article ID: 101734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101734
[8]  Yu, J., Zhang, H. and Zhang, Y. (2025) Distributed UAV Swarms for 3D Urban Area Coverage with Incomplete Information Using Event-Triggered Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 199, Article ID: 110734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110734
[9]  Guo, S., Zhou, L., Liang, S., Cao, K. and Song, Z. (2024) Connectivity-Enhanced 3D Deployment Algorithm for Multiple UAVs in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network. Aerospace, 11, Article No. 969.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11120969
[10]  Zhao, J., Xu, A., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Cao, M., et al. (2024) Overview and Prospects of Visibility Analysis Approaches. Proceedings, 110, Article No. 28.
https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024110028
[11]  Hanif, M., Shimizu, T., Lu, Z., et al. (2024) Efficient Angle-Aware Coverage Control for Large-Scale 3D Map Reconstruction Using Drone Networks. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, 17, 144-155.
https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2024.2346375
[12]  Tsiakas, K., Tsardoulias, E. and Symeonidis, A.L. (2024) Autonomous Full 3D Coverage Using an Aerial Vehicle, Performing Localization, Path Planning, and Navigation towards Indoors Inventorying for the Logistics Domain. Robotics, 13, Article No. 83.
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13060083
[13]  Zhang, C., Xu, C., Li, G. and He, B. (2025) A Distributed Task Allocation Approach for Multi-UAV Persistent Monitoring in Dynamic Environments. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 6437.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89787-3
[14]  Zhao, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, S., Zhang, T., Gong, Y. and Li, L. (2026) Multi-Stage Task Allocation Strategy for UAV Clusterin Multi-Object Tracking. Journal of Cloud Computing, 15, Article No. 21.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-025-00832-y
[15]  全国大学生数学建模组委会. 2025 “高教杯”全国大学生数学建模竞赛题[EB/OL].
https://www.cmathc.org.cn/mcm/st/301.html, 2025-09-04.
[16]  Huang, H., Jiang, Z., Yan, T. and Bai, Y. (2024) Dynamic Task Allocation for Heterogeneous Multi-UAVs in Uncertain Environments Based on 4DI-GWO Algorithm. Drones, 8, Article No. 236.
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8060236
[17]  Kong, X., Zhou, Y., Li, Z. and Wang, S. (2024) Multi-UAV Simultaneous Target Assignment and Path Planning Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning in Dynamic Multiple Obstacles Environments. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 17, Article ID: 1302898.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2023.1302898

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133