全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
投递稿件

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Contours of the Systematicity of International Law

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2026.172025, PP. 460-482

Keywords: International Legal Order, Norm on Legal Production, Theory of the Sources of Law, Inter-Legal-Order Relations

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article addresses the contours of the systematicity of international law from a perspective that contrasts with the distorted image shaped by the paradigm of the state-centeredness of law. Adopting a dialectical methodological approach and employing documentary and bibliographical research techniques, it aims to question the contours of that image in light of the process of institutionalization of international society and the proper operability of the basic concepts of the General Theory of Law. It is observed that the process of institutionalization of international society has given rise to a normative reality of its own, that is, to an effective legal order composed of norms endowed with objective validity and safeguarded by an institutionalized mechanism of sanction, whose primary norm of legal production lies in inter-State consensus. The lower degree of institutionalization of sanctions and the existence of soft norms do not affect its juridicity. Custom and treaties constitute primary sources of law, whereas secondary sources correspond to the law-making activity of international organizations. Since each legal system regulates, from an endogenous perspective, its relations with other legal orders, it may be stated that there is no a priori answer to the question concerning the relational design between international law and domestic law. However, a proper examination of this inter-legal-order relationship must dissociate the attributes of originality and independence.

 References

[1]  Accioly, H., Nascimento e Silva, G. E., & Casella, P. B. (2023). Manual de direito internacional público (26a ed.). Saraiva-Jur.
[2]  Arnold, R. (2004). Conflictos entre ordenamientos y su solución: El ejemplo alemán. Revista de Derecho Constitucional Europeo, 1.
https://www.ugr.es/~redce/ReDCE1/Conflictos%20entre%20ordenamientos%20y%20su%20solucion.htm
[3]  Balaguer Callejón, F. (2018). Manual de derecho constitucional (Vol. 1, 13a ed.). Tecnos.
[4]  Balaguer Callejón, F. (2020). La teoría de las fuentes del derecho del Estado constitucional. Revista de Derecho Constitucional Europeo, 17.
https://www.ugr.es/~redce/REDCE34/articulos/01_F_BALAGUER.htm
[5]  Barrilao, J. F. S. (2014). Constitution and Relationships between Legal Systems in the Context of Globalization. Estudios Constitucionales, 12, 55-108.
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002014000200004
[6]  Bassiouni, M. C. (2010). Perspectives on International Criminal Justice. Virginia Journal of International Law, 50, 269-323.
[7]  Bellido, á. M. (2004). Soft Law: Mucho ruido y pocas nueces? Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales (REEI), 8.
https://reei.tirant.com/reei/article/view/4549
[8]  Bobbio, N. (2010). La consuetudine come fatto normativo. Giappichelli.
[9]  Castro, P. C. (2021). Direito internacional na era da globaliza？？o: Mudan？as de paradigmas no sistema internacional e na ordem jurídica internacional. In A. C. N. Gomes, B. Albegaria, & M. R. Canotilho (Eds.), Direito constitucional: Diálogos em homenagem ao 80o aniversário de J. J. Gomes Canotilho (pp. 929-1014). Forum.
[10]  Crisafulli, V. (1970). Lezioni di diritto costituzionale (Vol. 1, 2a ed.). CEDAM.
[11]  Culot, H. (2005). Soft law et droit de l’OMC. Revue internationale de droit économique, 19, Article No. 251.
https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.193.0251
[12]  Díaz Inverso, R. (2015). La norma consuetudinaria internacional y el consentimiento de los Estados. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, No. 38, 113-134.
http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/rfd/n38/2301-0665-rfd-38-119.pdf
[13]  Fitzmaurice, G. G. (1956). The Foundations of the Authority of International Law and the Problem of Enforcement. The Modern Law Review, 19, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1956.tb00340.x
[14]  Giannini, M. S. (1958). Gli elementi degli ordinamenti giuridici. Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico, 8, 219-240.
[15]  Gierke, O. V. (2010). Teorías políticas de la Edad Media. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
[16]  Guastini, R. (2005). Das fontes às normas. Quartier Latin.
[17]  Guimar？es, D. F. (2021). A intera？？o entre os espa？os constitucionais nacionais e internacionais e seus impactos no sistema de fontes do direito: As li？？es da prote？？o cooperativa de direitos humanos e o caso da integra？？o europeia. Revista de Direito Internacional, 18, 172-191.
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v18i3.8078
[18]  Hespanha, A. M. (2019). Cultura jurídica europeia: Síntese de um milénio. Almedina.
[19]  Hsu Cleto, V. (2021). O fundamento do direito internacional público: Uma releitura da Vereinbarung. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 21, 339-363.
https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2021.21.15596
[20]  ICJ (1962). Certain Expenses of the United Nations. Advisory Opinion of 20 July 1962.
https://www.icj-cij.org/case/49
[21]  ICJ (1970). Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited. Belgium v. Spain. Second Phase. Judgment of 5 February 1970.
https://www.icj-cij.org/case/50/judgments
[22]  ICJ (1984). Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (pp. 392-443). Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/70/070-19841126-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
[23]  ICJ (1995). Timor oriental (Portugal c. Australie) (pp. 90-106). arrêt, C.I.J. Recueil.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/84/084-19950630-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
[24]  ICJ (1996). Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders. Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict. Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/93/093-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf
[25]  ICJ (2002). Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon V. Nigeria). Judgment of 10 October 2002.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/94/094-20021010-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
[26]  ICJ (2004). Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion (p. 199). I. C. J. Reports.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/131/131-20040709-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf
[27]  ICJ (2006). Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda), Jurisdiction and Admissibility (p. 6). Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/126/126-20060203-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
[28]  ICJ (2012). Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening) (pp. 99-156). Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/143/143-20120203-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
[29]  Kelsen, H. (1986). Teoria geral das normas. Sergio Antonio Fabris.
[30]  Kelsen, H. (1989). Il problema della sovranità e la teoria del diritto internazionale. Giuffrè.
[31]  Kelsen, H. (1990). Teoria geral do direito e do Estado (5a ed.). Martins Fontes.
[32]  Kelsen, H. (1998). Teoria pura do direito. Martins Fontes.
[33]  Lu？o, A.-E. P. (2000). La peculiaridad normativa de los principios generales del derecho. Persona y Derecho, 42, 131-159.
[34]  MacGibbon, I. C. (1957). Customary International Law and Acquiescence. British Year Book of International Law, 33, 115-145.
https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/byrint33§ion=8
[35]  Mazzuoli, V. O. (2012). Algumas quest？es jurídicas sobre a forma？？o e aplica？？o do costume internacional. Revista dos Tribunais, 921, 259-278.
[36]  Perassi, T. (1955). Lezioni di diritto internazionale (Parte prima, 4a ristampa). CEDAM.
[37]  Perassi, T. (1967). Introduzione alle scienze giuridiche (3a stampa). CEDAM.
[38]  Reale, M. (1998). Pluralismo e liberdade. Express？o e Cultura.
[39]  Rousseau, J.-J. (2000). Do contrato social (ou princípios do direito político) (3a ed.). Martin Claret.
[40]  Shaw, M. N. (2003). International Law (5a ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[41]  STF (1998). CR 8279 AgR. Relator(a): CELSO DE MELLO, Tribunal Pleno, julgado em 17-06-1998, DJ 10-08-2000 PP-00006 EMENT VOL-01999-01 PP-00042.
[42]  Triepel, K. H. (1966). As rela？？es entre o direito interno e o direito internacional. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, No. 6, 7-64.
[43]  Trindade, A. A. C. (2012). A expans？o do direito das organiza？？es internacionais. In Direito das organiza？？es internacionais (5a ed., pp. 557-574). Del Rey.
[44]  Trindade, A. A. C. (2015a). A forma？？o do direito internacional contemporaneo. In A humaniza？？o do direito internacional (2a ed., pp. 28-89). Del Rey.
[45]  Trindade, A. A. C. (2015b). La humanización del derecho internacional y los límites de la razón de Estado. In A humaniza？？o do direito internacional (2a ed., pp. 134-142). Del Rey.
[46]  Varella, M. D. (2011). Direito internacional público (3a ed.). Saraiva.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133