全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Causes of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Single-Center Series from Idrissa Pouye General Hospital, Senegal

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2026.165027, PP. 288-295

Keywords: Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty, Aseptic Loosening, Dislocation, Vancouver B2, Bone Loss

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective procedure, but the increasing number of implants and patient life expectancy have led to a rise in revision surgeries. This study aims to identify and analyze the causes of THA revision within our orthopedic department in Dakar. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted over an 11-year period. All patients who underwent revision THA were included. Fractures were assessed using the Vancouver classification and bone loss was evaluated using the SOFCOT and Paprosky classifications. Results: Thirty cases were analysed. Aseptic loosening was the leading cause of revision (46.67%), with an average onset of 10 ± 8 years post-implantation. These loosenings were predominantly bipolar (80%), characterised by significant bone loss and primarily classified as SOFCOT type 2 and Paprosky grade 2A. Prosthetic instability (dislocation) was the second most common cause of failure (26.67%). Periprosthetic fractures accounted for 13.33% of cases and were all classified as Vancouver type B2, indicating an unstable femoral stem. Other causes included material wear/breakage (6.67%) and septic loosening (3.33%). Conclusion: In our practice, aseptic loosening and instability are the primary drivers of THA revision. Improving long-term outcomes will require more rigorous primary surgical techniques, advanced implants such as dual-mobility cups for high-risk patients and thorough radiological follow-up to detect mechanical failures before significant bone loss occurs.

References

[1]  Malviya, A., Abdul, N. and Khanduja, V. (2017) Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of the Registry Data. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 51, 405-413.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.ijortho_177_17
[2]  Puget, J. (2005) Les prothèses totales de la hanche. Les choix. Masson Elsevier, 498.
[3]  Meira, E.P. and Zeni, J. (2014) Sports Participation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 9, 839-850.
[4]  Kelmer, G., Stone, A.H., Turcotte, J. and King, P.J. (2021) Reasons for Revision: Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Mechanisms of Failure. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 29, 78-87.
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00860
[5]  George, A. and Ofori-Atta, P. (2019) Joint Replacement Surgery in Ghana (West Africa)—An Observational Study. International Orthopaedics, 43, 1041-1047.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04286-1
[6]  Davies, P.S., Graham, S.M., Maqungo, S. and Harrison, W.J. (2019) Total Joint Replacement in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Tropical Doctor, 49, 120-128.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049475518822239
[7]  Bozic, K.J., Kurtz, S.M., Lau, E., Ong, K., Vail, T.P. and Berry, D.J. (2009) The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 91, 128-133.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00155
[8]  Gastaud, O., Cambas, P.M. and Tabutin, J. (2016) Reprises de PTH par tige de première intention après échec de l’implant fémoral. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 102, 118-122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2016.01.013
[9]  Lebeau, N., Bayle, M., Belhaouane, R., Chelli, M., Havet, E., Brunschweiler, B., et al. (2017) Reprises de PTH par implant acétabulaire double mobilité cimenté dans une armature métallique: Analyse d’une série de 62 cas à 5 ans de recul minimal. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 103, 477-483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2017.05.026
[10]  Oltean-Dan, D., Apostu, D., Tomoaia, G., et al. (2017) Causes of Revision after Total Hip Arthroplasty in an Orthopedics and Traumatology Regional Center. Clujul Medical, 90, 85-89.
https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2136
[11]  Fen, X., Gu, J. and Zhou, Y. (2022) Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Failure: Aseptic Loosening Remains the Most Common Cause of Revision. American Journal of Translational Research, 14, 7080-7089.
[12]  Kahlenberg, C.A., Swarup, I., Krell, E.C., Heinz, N. and Figgie, M.P. (2019) Causes of Revision in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34, 1435-1440.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.014

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133