全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Risk Analysis and Impact of Technology Advancements, Cost Changes, and Opportunities from Electrolysing Sea Water

DOI: 10.4236/epe.2026.185015, PP. 289-309

Keywords: Green Hydrogen, Seawater Electrolysis, Electrolyser, Photovoltaic Systems, Economic Feasibility, Risk Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Green hydrogen (H2) has garnered significant scholarly interest as a viable strategy for the decarbonisation of sectors that are challenging to electrify, while simultaneously promoting the proliferation of renewable energy resources. As the global appetite for clean energy escalates, the significance of hydrogen in fulfilling prospective energy requirements becomes increasingly paramount. Nonetheless, literature offers little insights into the risk factors for hydrogen production through seawater electrolysis, particularly within the framework of early technologies and economic dynamics. Thus, there is a less than a comprehensive understanding of the viability and scalability of seawater electrolysis for the generation of green hydrogen. To mitigate this research void, the current investigation undertakes a systematic risk assessment, scrutinising various critical determinants that affect hydrogen production via seawater electrolysis. Specifically, the analysis appraises the capital investments necessitated for photovoltaic (PV) systems and electrolysers, the efficiency metrics of both technological approaches, and the operational and maintenance (O&M) expenditures. By integrating these essential components, the research aspires to offer an exhaustive comprehension of the financial and operational risks, while also examining the prospective ramifications of technological innovations and cost fluctuations on the future trajectory of seawater electrolysis for green hydrogen production. The findings reveal a pronounced sensitivity of the aggregate project cost to presumptions concerning PV and electrolyser efficiency and capital expenditure. Throughout the analysed scenarios, total project costs exhibit considerable variability, oscillating between approximately 498.24 billion USD and 2913.84 billion USD, thereby highlighting significant economic uncertainty. Qualitatively, the results illustrate those ongoing reductions in costs and enhancements in efficiency of PV and electrolysis technologies are vital facilitators for bolstering economic feasibility, whereas enduring cost and performance risks continue to pose a formidable obstacle to the large-scale implementation of seawater electrolysis.

References

[1]  El-Kady, A.H., Amin, M.T., Khan, F. and El-Halwagi, M.M. (2024) Identification and Assessment of Risk Factors in Offshore Wind-Integrated Hydrogen Production System. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 52, 1312-1332.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.184
[2]  Anwar, S., Khan, F., Zhang, Y. and Djire, A. (2021) Recent Development in Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production through Water Electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 32284-32317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.191
[3]  Herzog, T. (2009) World Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005.
https://www.wri.org/data/world-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2005
[4]  International Energy Agency: Renewable Energy Market Update 2022.
https://www.iea.org/t&c/
[5]  Sadik-Zada, E.R. (2021) Political Economy of Green Hydrogen Rollout: A Global Perspective. Sustainability, 13, Article 13464.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313464
[6]  Müller, V.P., Eichhammer, W. and van Vuuren, D. (2024) Paving the Way: Analysing Energy Transition Pathways and Green Hydrogen Exports in Developing Countries—The Case of Algeria. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 67, 240-250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.153
[7]  International Energy Agency: Global Hydrogen Review 2023.
https://www.iea.org
[8]  Bp (2026) bp Energy Outlook 2023.
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/energy-outlook.html
[9]  Xin, Y., Hua, Q., Li, C., Zhu, H., Gao, L., Ren, X., et al. (2024) Enhancing Electrochemical Performance and Corrosion Resistance of Nickel-Based Catalysts in Seawater Electrolysis: Focusing on OER and Her. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 12, 23147-23178.
https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ta03393k
[10]  Zhao, C., Ding, Z., Zhang, K., Du, Z., Fang, H., Chen, L., et al. (2025) Comprehensive Chlorine Suppression: Advances in Materials and System Technologies for Direct Seawater Electrolysis. Nano-Micro Letters, 17, Article No. 113.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-025-01653-z
[11]  Yu, H., Wan, J., Goodsite, M. and Jin, H. (2023) Advancing Direct Seawater Electrocatalysis for Green and Affordable Hydrogen. One Earth, 6, 267-277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.003
[12]  Rahil, A.N.J. and Eng, B. (2018) Dispatchable Operation of Multiple Electrolysers for Demand Side Response and the Production of Hydrogen Fuel-Libyan Case Study. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development (IESD), De Montfort University.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdulla-Rahil/publication/331010746_PhD_Thesis_ARahil/links/5c94c938a6fdccd46031e115/PhD-Thesis-ARahil.pdf
[13]  Rawesat, A. (2024) TERA—The Role of Gas Turbines in Greening a Country. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Aerospace, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University.
[14]  Yu, S. (2013) An Optimal Design Methodology for Hydrogen Energy Storage to Support Wind Power at the University of Bath. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Bath.
[15]  Shaner, M.R., Atwater, H.A., Lewis, N.S. and McFarland, E.W. (2016) A Comparative Technoeconomic Analysis of Renewable Hydrogen Production Using Solar Energy. Energy & Environmental Science, 9, 2354-2371.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee02573g
[16]  Wang, X., Gao, J., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, X. and Zhang, L. (2025) Over 12% Efficiency Solar-Powered Green Hydrogen Production from Seawater. Energy & Environmental Science, 18, 5264-5276.
https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee06203e
[17]  Marocco, P., Ferrero, D., Gandiglio, M., Ortiz, M.M., Sundseth, K., Lanzini, A., et al. (2020) A Study of the Techno-Economic Feasibility of H2-Based Energy Storage Systems in Remote Areas. Energy Conversion and Management, 211, Article ID: 112768.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112768
[18]  Liu, Z., Sofia, S.E., Laine, H.S., Woodhouse, M., Wieghold, S., Peters, I.M., et al. (2020) Revisiting Thin Silicon for Photovoltaics: A Technoeconomic Perspective. Energy & Environmental Science, 13, 12-23.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee02452b
[19]  El Ghetany, H. and El Awady, M.H. (2023) Techno-Economic Study of the Potential for Green Hydrogen Production in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, 66, 127-135.
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2023.188736.7493
[20]  Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Yu, E., Ye, H., Li, Z., et al. (2024) A Review of Hydrogen Production via Seawater Electrolysis: Current Status and Challenges. Catalysts, 14, Article 691.
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14100691
[21]  Kakavand, A., Sayadi, S., Tsatsaronis, G. and Behbahaninia, A. (2023) Techno-Economic Assessment of Green Hydrogen and Ammonia Production from Wind and Solar Energy in Iran. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48, 14170-14191.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.285
[22]  Hou, P., Enevoldsen, P., Eichman, J., Hu, W., Jacobson, M.Z. and Chen, Z. (2017) Optimizing Investments in Coupled Offshore Wind-Electrolytic Hydrogen Storage Systems in Denmark. Journal of Power Sources, 359, 186-197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.048
[23]  Hausmann, J.N., Schl?gl, R., Menezes, P.W. and Driess, M. (2021) Is Direct Seawater Splitting Economically Meaningful? Energy & Environmental Science, 14, 3679-3685.
https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee03659e
[24]  National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2022) IRC 2022: XVI International Research Conference Proceedings. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation.
https://www.nrel.gov/
[25]  Rawesat, A. (2024) Greening an Oil Exporting Country: Libyan Hydrogen, Solar and Gas Turbine Case Study. Ecology & Conservation Science: Open Access, 4, Article ID: 555633.
https://doi.org/10.19080/ecoa.2024.04.555633
[26]  Cengiz, M.S. and Mami?, M.S. (2015) Price-Efficiency Relationship for Photovoltaic Systems on a Global Basis. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2015, Article ID: 256101.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/256101
[27]  Fu, P., Pudjianto, D., Zhang, X. and Strbac, G. (2020) Integration of Hydrogen into Multi-Energy Systems Optimisation. Energies, 13, Article 1606.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071606
[28]  Xu, Z., Zhao, N., Hillmansen, S., Roberts, C. and Yan, Y. (2022) Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Storage Technologies for Railway Engineering: A Review. Energies, 15, Article 6467.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176467
[29]  Huang, X., Qu, Y., Zhu, Z. and Wu, Q. (2023) Techno-Economic Analysis of Photovoltaic Hydrogen Production Considering Technological Progress Uncertainty. Sustainability, 15, Article 3580.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043580
[30]  Lebepe, M.C., Oviroh, P.O. and Jen, T. (2025) Techno-Economic Optimisation Modelling of a Solar-Powered Hydrogen Production System for Green Hydrogen Generation. Sustainable Energy Research, 12, Article No. 11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-025-00151-5

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133