Feasibility Study of Measuring the Dose Per Pulse and Instantaneous Dose Rates Using a Silicon Photodiode Detector for a 10-MV Flattening Filter-Free Mode in Radiation Therapy
This study aimed at developing a pulse dosimeter for radiation therapy. The dose per pulse (DPP) and instantaneous dose rates of a commercially available medical linear accelerator were measured using a novel detector composed of a silicon photodiode (Si-PD) with a 0.4-mm-thick Cu filter, single operational amplifier, resistor, capacitor, and substrate. The pulse voltages from the detector were measured using an analog-to-digital converter. The dependence of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 monitor units (MU) was measured at a depth of 100 mm with a field size of 100 × 100 mm2 and a constant distance of 1.0 m between the source and detector. Each MU was subjected to three measurements under a 10-MV flattening filter-free mode with a dose rate of 2400 MU/min. The DPP (mGy) was calibrated at 100 MUs using a Farmer-type ionization chamber, and the instantaneous dose rates were calculated using assumed values of a 2.8 ms pulse interval and a 4.5 μs pulse width. The depth dependence was also measured at 20 and 100 mm with a field size of 50 × 50 mm2 for 100 MUs. The number of pulses was proportional to that of MUs with maximum values of DPP being 1.422 and 1.100 mGy/pulse at depths of 20 and 100 mm, respectively; the corresponding instantaneous dose rates were 0.508 and 0.393 Gy/s at 2.8 ms and 316.0 and 244.3 Gy/s at 4.5 μs. The results indicate that the developed Si-PD detector can efficiently measure DPP and instantaneous dose rates.
References
[1]
Hughes, J.R. and Parsons, J.L. (2020) FLASH Radiotherapy: Current Knowledge and Future Insights Using Proton-Beam Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 6492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186492
[2]
Gao, F., Yang, Y., Zhu, H., Wang, J., Xiao, D., Zhou, Z., et al. (2022) First Demonstration of the FLASH Effect with Ultrahigh Dose Rate High-Energy X-Rays. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 166, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.004
[3]
Zhu, H., Xie, D., Wang, Y., Huang, R., Chen, X., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) Comparison of Intratumor and Local Immune Response between MV X-Ray FLASH and Conventional Radiotherapies. Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology, 38, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.005
[4]
Zhu, H., Xie, D., Yang, Y., Huang, S., Gao, X., Peng, Y., et al. (2022) Radioprotective Effect of X-Ray Abdominal FLASH Irradiation: Adaptation to Oxidative Damage and Inflammatory Response May Be Benefiting Factors. Medical Physics, 49, 4812-4822. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15680
[5]
Schulte, R., Johnstone, C., Boucher, S., Esarey, E., Geddes, C.G.R., Kravchenko, M., et al. (2023) Transformative Technology for FLASH Radiation Therapy. Applied Sciences, 13, Article 5021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085021
[6]
Jolly, S., Owen, H., Schippers, M. and Welsch, C. (2020) Technical Challenges for FLASH Proton Therapy. Physica Medica, 78, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.005
[7]
Georg, D., Knöös, T. and McClean, B. (2011) Current Status and Future Perspective of Flattening Filter Free Photon Beams. Medical Physics, 38, 1280-1293. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3554643
[8]
Ma, C., Chen, M., Long, T., Parsons, D., Gu, X., Jiang, S., et al. (2019) Flattening Filter Free in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT)—Theoretical Modeling with Delivery Efficiency Analysis. Medical Physics, 46, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13267
[9]
Pokhrel, D., Halfman, M. and Sanford, L. (2020) FFF-VMAT for SBRT of Lung Lesions: Improves Dose Coverage at Tumor-Lung Interface Compared to Flattened Beams. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 21, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12764
[10]
Verbakel, W.F.A.R., van den Berg, J., Slotman, B.J. and Sminia, P. (2013) Comparable Cell Survival between High Dose Rate Flattening Filter Free and Conventional Dose Rate Irradiation. Acta Oncologica, 52, 652-657. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2012.737021
[11]
Nakano, H., Minami, K., Yagi, M., Imaizumi, H., Otani, Y., Inoue, S., et al. (2018) Radiobiological Effects of Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams on A549 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Journal of Radiation Research, 59, 442-445. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry041
[12]
Yamaguchi, S. and Sato, E. (2019) Product Development of a Condenser Dosimeter Using a Skin-Insulated USB-A-Substrate with a Silicon X-Ray Diode. Radiological Physics and Technology, 12, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-00493-4
[13]
Yamaguchi, S., Ieko, Y., Ariga, H. and Yoshioka, K. (2021) Characterization of an Under-Development Capacitor Dosimeter Equipped with a Silicon X-Ray Diode. Review of Scientific Instruments, 92, Article 123101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061061
[14]
Yamaguchi, S., Sato, E., Ieko, Y., Ariga, H. and Yoshioka, K. (2020) A Capacitor Dosimeter with Disposable Silicon-Diode Substrates for 4-MV X-Ray Beam Detection in Radiation Therapy. Physics Open, 4, Article 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2020.100026
[15]
Yamaguchi, S., Ieko, Y., Ariga, H. and Yoshioka, K. (2023) Electron Beam Detection in Radiotherapy Using a Capacitor Dosimeter Equipped with a Silicon Photodiode. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 61, 2197-2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02870-7
[16]
Yamaguchi, S., Ariga, H. and Yoshioka, K. (2024) Development of a Dose-Rate Dosimeter Using a Silicon Photodiode for a Medical Linear Accelerator in a 10 MV Flattening Filter-Free Mode. Review of Scientific Instruments, 95, Article 053102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0179656
[17]
Kry, S.F., Popple, R., Molineu, A. and Followill, D.S. (2012) Ion Recombination Correction Factors (Pion) for Varian TrueBeam High-Dose-Rate Therapy Beams. JournalofAppliedClinicalMedicalPhysics, 13, 318-325. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3803
[18]
Xiao, Y., Kry, S.F., Popple, R., Yorke, E., Papanikolaou, N., Stathakis, S., et al. (2015) Flattening Filter‐Free Accelerators: A Report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group. JournalofAppliedClinicalMedicalPhysics, 16, 12-29. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219