This study examines the influence of injection rate on fracture development during hydraulic fracturing using water as the fracturing fluid. Laboratory experiments were performed on concrete, low-permeability sandstone, and brittle bituminous coal over a broad range of injection rates. The results indicate that both low (<1.0 mL/min) and high (≥5.0 mL/min) injection rates predominantly produced simple, planar fractures, reflecting limited fracture branching. In contrast, an intermediate injection rate of 2.2 mL/min consistently resulted in the most complex fracture patterns. The potential for enhanced fracture complexity was inferred from fracture surface roughness obtained via 3D scanning and characterized using the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC), which exhibited its highest values at this intermediate injection rate. Although water is sometimes considered less effective than unconventional fluids, the findings demonstrate that it performs well in moderately permeable rocks with sufficient tensile strength. However, water was less effective in brittle coal and low-permeability sandstone, where more compressible, low-viscosity fluids may be advantageous. Overall, three fracture behavior regimes were identified: a low-rate regime producing simple fractures, a mid-rate optimal regime producing complex networks, and a high-rate regime where fracture complexity decreased. Building on earlier findings that associate higher fluid injection rates with increased fracture complexity, this study explicitly identifies a limiting injection rate beyond which fracture network complexity no longer exhibits significant growth. Thin fractures dominated because controlled injection conditions focused on observing fracture behavior rather than merely inducing fracture, as reflected by the relatively high post-fracture injection pressure.
References
[1]
Yu, H., Xu, W., Li, B., Huang, H., Micheal, M., Wang, Q., et al. (2023) Hydraulic Fracturing and Enhanced Recovery in Shale Reservoirs: Theoretical Analysis to Engineering Applications. Energy & Fuels, 37, 9956-9997. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c01029
[2]
Mwakipunda, G.C., Wang, Y., Mgimba, M.M., Ngata, M.R., Alhassan, J., Mkono, C.N., et al. (2023) Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Deep Unmineable Coal Seams Using CO2-ECBM Technology: Experimental Studies, Simulation, and Field Applications. Energy & Fuels, 37, 17161-17186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c03004
[3]
Guanhua, N., Kai, D., Shang, L. and Qian, S. (2019) Gas Desorption Characteristics Effected by the Pulsating Hydraulic Fracturing in Coal. Fuel, 236, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.005
[4]
Ji, Y., Zhuang, L., Wu, W., Hofmann, H., Zang, A. and Zimmermann, G. (2021) Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54, 5389-5405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7
[5]
Wu, K., Paranjothi, G., Milford, J.B. and Kreith, F. (2016) Transition to Sustainability with Natural Gas from Fracking. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 14, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.01.003
[6]
Kong, L., Ranjith, P.G. and Li, B.Q. (2021) Fluid-Driven Micro-Cracking Behaviour of Crystalline Rock Using a Coupled Hydro-Grain-Based Discrete Element Method. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 144, Article 104766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104766
[7]
Zhang, B., Cui, X., Wang, L. and Fu, X. (2022) Rock Fracture Response Exposed to Hydraulic Fracturing: Insight into the Effect of Injection Rate on Aperture Pattern. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9431143
[8]
Zhou, X. and Burbey, T.J. (2013) Fluid Effect on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Behavior: A Comparison between Water and Supercritical CO2-Like Fluid. Geofluids, 14, 174-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfl.12061
[9]
Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. and Huang, B. (2021) Investigation of the Fracturing Effect Induced by the Disturbing Stress of Hydrofracturing Using the Bonded-Particle Model. Geofluids, 2021, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9988748
[10]
Irwin, G.R. (1957) Analysis of Stresses and Strains near the End of a Crack Traversing a Plate. JournalofAppliedMechanics, 24, 361-364. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4011547
[11]
Griffith, A.A. (1921) The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Containing Papersof a Mathematical or Physical Character, 221, 163198.
[12]
Roylance, D. (2001) Introduction to Fracture Mechanics. https://live.ocw.mit.edu/courses/3-91-mechanical-behavior-of-plastics-spring-2007/ca3759efc1b8fd66d57dce1147d4a1db_23_frac.pdf
[13]
Zeng, X. and Wei, Y. (2017) Crack Deflection in Brittle Media with Heterogeneous Interfaces and Its Application in Shale Fracking. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 101, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.12.012
[14]
Xi, X., Shipton, Z.K., Kendrick, J.E., FraserHarris, A., Mouli-Castillo, J., Edlmann, K., et al. (2022) Mixed-Mode Fracture Modelling of the Near-Wellbore Interaction between Hydraulic Fracture and Natural Fracture. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55, 5433-5452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02922-8
[15]
Kolawole, O. and Ispas, I. (2020) Interaction between Hydraulic Fractures and Natural Fractures: Current Status and Prospective Directions. Journal ofPetroleumExplorationandProductionTechnology, 10, 1613-1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-00778-3
[16]
Dehghan, A.N. (2020) An Experimental Investigation into the Influence of Pre-Existing Natural Fracture on the Behavior and Length of Propagating Hydraulic Fracture. EngineeringFractureMechanics, 240, Article 107330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107330
[17]
Zheng, Y., Liu, J. and Zhang, B. (2019) An Investigation into the Effects of Weak Interfaces on Fracture Height Containment in Hydraulic Fracturing. Energies, 12, Article 3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173245
[18]
Ma, Y., Wang, D. and Zheng, Y. (2023) Influence of the Bedding Plane on the Propagation of Multiple Hydraulic Fractures. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, Article 1077652. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1077652
[19]
Ishida, T., Chen, Q., Mizuta, Y. and Roegiers, J. (2004) Influence of Fluid Viscosity on the Hydraulic Fracturing Mechanism. JournalofEnergyResourcesTechnology, 126, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1791651
[20]
Zheng, Y., Wei, H., Zhang, A. and Niu, Q. (2025) Exploring the Influence of Fluid Viscosity on the Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Composite Coal Seams. EngineeringFractureMechanics, 323, Article 111203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111203
[21]
Brady, B.H. and Brown, E.T. (2006) Rock Mechanics: For Underground Mining. Springer Science & Business Media.
[22]
Lockner, D. (1993) The Role of Acoustic Emission in the Study of Rock Fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30, 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-b
[23]
Heinze, T., Galvan, B. and Miller, S.A. (2015) Modeling Porous Rock Fracturing Induced by Fluid Injection. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 77, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.04.003
[24]
Zoback, M.D. and Kohli, A.H. (2019) Unconventional Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091869
[25]
Hubbert, M.K. and Willis, D.G. (1957) Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing. Transactions of the AIME, 210, 153-168. https://doi.org/10.2118/686-g
[26]
Singh, S.B., Munjal, P. and Thammishetti, N. (2015) Role of Water/Cement Ratio on Strength Development of Cement Mortar. Journal of Building Engineering, 4, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.09.003
[27]
Li, W. (2021) Analysis of the Influence of Water-Cement Ratio on Concrete Strength. E3S Web of Conferences, 283, Article 301016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128301016
[28]
Bieniawski, Z.T. and Bernede, M.J. (1979) Suggested Methods for Determining the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Deformability of Rock Materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & GeomechanicsAbstracts, 16, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)91450-5
[29]
Pawar, Y. and Kate, S. (2020) Curing of Concrete: A Review. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 7, 1820-1824. https://www.academia.edu/download/64721827/IRJET_V7I8302.pdf
[30]
Tan, K. and Gjorv, O.E. (1996) Performance of Concrete under Different Curing Conditions. Cement and Concrete Research, 26, 355-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(96)85023-x
[31]
Xiu, Z., Wang, S., Ji, Y., Wang, F., Ren, F. and Nguyen, V. (2021) Loading Rate Effect on the Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) Behavior of Cemented Paste Backfill (CPB). ConstructionandBuildingMaterials, 271, Article 121526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121526
[32]
Neville, A.M. (1995) Properties of Concrete. Vol. 4. Longman London.
[33]
Speight, J.G. (2012) The Chemistry and Technology of Coal. CRC Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=UWAWLUk4nJIC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Speight,+J.G.,+The+chemistry+and+technology+of+coal.+2012:+CRC+press.&ots=X1dwtPGCGU&sig=tMWnsi_Jzk7ZCXG8Kbk7Fjx75GQ
[34]
Tse, R. and Cruden, D.M. (1979) Estimating Joint Roughness Coefficients. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 16, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90241-9