Understanding and managing ecological resources to protect human health and the environment requires appropriate assessment tools and on-going monitoring and adaptive management. While formal risk assessment protocols for examining human and ecological health are a central part of environmental management, we propose that a simpler four-tiered approach may allow more communication and collaboration among diverse stakeholders. Our protocol suggests that there are four main aspects of environmental evaluations that can increase such collaboration: 1) include all stakeholders throughout the process, 2) consensus among stakeholders on the problem or issue and a path forward, 3) data acquisition and analysis to address data and knowledge gaps, and 4) consensus on a solution based on sound science and stakeholder collaboration at every stage. Environmental indicators form the basis of data acquisition, and we present two case studies to illustrate this process: 1) closing the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Amchitka Island where three underground nuclear tests were conducted (1965-1971) and 2) developing an ecosystem indicator that can be used across eco-regions to evaluate ecological resources. In the former case, the process involved extensive stakeholder involvement at all stages, while in the latter case, there was a general need for a screening tool (an indicator) for evaluating ecological resources on diverse DOE sites across the U.S. In both cases the general approach used the four main aspects of environmental evaluation to demonstrate its usefulness as a tool for collaboration among a variety of governmental and non-governmental stakeholders.
References
[1]
Kingsley, M. (2019) Commentary—Climate Change, Health and Green Space Co-Benefits. HealthPromotionandChronicDiseasePreventioninCanada, 39, 131-135. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.39.4.04
[2]
van den Berg, M., Wendel-Vos, W., van Poppel, M., Kemper, H., van Mechelen, W. and Maas, J. (2015) Health Benefits of Green Spaces in the Living Environment: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies. UrbanForestry&UrbanGreening, 14, 806-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.008
[3]
Forman, R.T.T. (1995) Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press.
[4]
Meeker, D.O. and Merkel, D.L. (1984) Climax Theories and a Recommendation for Vegetation Classification: A Viewpoint. JournalofRangeManagement, 37, 427-420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3899630
[5]
Environmental Protection Agency (2024) Ecoregions of North America. https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregions-north-america
[6]
Harclerode, M.A., Macbeth, T.W., Miller, M.E., Gurr, C.J. and Myers, T.S. (2016) Early Decision Framework for Integrating Sustainable Risk Management for Complex Remediation Sites: Drivers, Barriers, and Performance Metrics. JournalofEnvironmentalManagement, 184, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.087
[7]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Giffen, N., Brown, K.G., Cortes, M., Ng, K., et al. (2023) Comparing Land Cover and Interior Forests on Contaminated Land and the Surrounding Region: Oak Ridge Reservation as a Case Study. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 86, 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2023.2223231
[8]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Brown, K.G., Ng, K. and Kosson, D.S. (2025) An Approach for Assessing Risk, Planning, and Decision-Making in Protecting Ecological Resources on Contaminated Sites Compared to Local Regions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197, Article No. 612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-13993-9
[9]
National Research Council (NRC) (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press.
[10]
National Research Council (NRC) (1993) Issues in Risk Assessment. National Academy Press.
[11]
National Research Council (NRC) (1995) Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE’s Environmental Management Program. National Academy Press.
[12]
National Research Council (NRC) (2000) Ecological Indicators for the Nation. National Academy Press.
Norton, S.B., Rodier, D.J., van der Schalie, W.H., Wood, W.P., Slimak, M.W. and Gentile, J.H. (1992) A Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment at the EPA. EnvironmentalToxicologyandChemistry, 11, 1663-1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620111202
[17]
Kohlhoff, D.W. (2002) Amchitka and the Bomb: Nuclear Testing in Alaska. University of Washington Press.
[18]
Department of Energy (DOE) (2024) EM Strategic Vision: 2024-2034. Department of Energy, Office of Environ-mental Management.
[19]
Crowley, K.D. and Ahearne, J.F. (2002) Managing the Environmental Legacy of U.S. Nuclear-Weapons Production. AmericanScientist, 90, Article No. 514. https://doi.org/10.1511/2002.39.514
[20]
National Research Council (NRC) (2019) Independent Assessment of Science and Technology for the Department of Energy’s Defense Environmental Cleanup Program. Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board. National Academy Press.
[21]
Department of Energy (DOE) (2019) Hanford Lifecycle Scope, Schedule, and Cost Report. DOE/RL-2018-45 (Rev 0). Richland Operations Office.
[22]
Gochfeld, M., Burger, J., Powers, C. and Kosson, D. (2015) Land Use Planning Scenarios for Contaminated Land: Comparing EPA, State and Federal and Tribal Approaches. WasteManagementSymposium, Phoenix, 15-19 March 2015, 1-16.
[23]
Whicker, F.W., Hinton, T.G., MacDonell, M.M., Pinder, J.E. and Habegger, L.J. (2004) Avoiding Destructive Remediation at DOE Sites. Science, 303, 1615-1616. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093187
[24]
Energy Communities Alliance (ECA) (2025) Profile: Oak Ridge Reservation. https://www.energyca.org/site-profiles/oak-ridge-reservation
[25]
Brown, K.S. (1998) The Great DOE Land Rush? Science, 282, 616-617. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.616
[26]
Dale, V.H. and Parr, P.D. (1998) Preserving DOE’s Research Parks. IssuesinScienceandTechnology, 14, 73-77.
[27]
NPS (National Park Service) (2017) Hanford, WA Site—Manhattan Project National Historical Site. https://www.nps.gov/mapr/hanford.htm
[28]
Burger, J. (2019) Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites. EcoHealth, 16, 454-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-019-01437-z
[29]
DOE (Department of Energy) (1994) Stewards of a National Resource. (DOE/FM-0002), Office of Energy Re-search, Department of Energy.
[30]
DOE (Department of Energy) (1994) National Environmental Research Parks. Office of Energy Research, Department of Energy.
[31]
Burger, J. (2007) A Model for Selecting Bioindicators to Monitor Radionuclide Concentrations Using Amchitka Island in the Aleutians as a Case Study. EnvironmentalResearch, 105, 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.05.017
[32]
Burger, J. (2022) Trust and Consequences: Role of Community Science, Perceptions, Values, and Environmental Justice in Risk Communication. RiskAnalysis, 42, 2362-2375. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14020
[33]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Powers, C.W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., et al. (2005) Science, Policy, and Stakeholders: Developing a Consensus Science Plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska. EnvironmentalManagement, 35, 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0126-6
[34]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D.S. and Powers, C.W. (2007) A Biomonitoring Plan for Assessing Potential Radionuclide Exposure Using Amchitka Island in the Aleutian Chain of Alaska as a Case Study. JournalofEnvironmentalRadioactivity, 98, 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.06.002
[35]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Powers, C.W., Kosson, D.S., Halverson, J., Siekaniec, G., et al. (2007) Scientific Research, Stakeholders, and Policy: Continuing Dialogue during Research on Radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska. JournalofEnvironmentalManagement, 85, 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.005
[36]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Pletnikoff, K., Snigaroff, R., Snigaroff, D. and Stamm, T. (2008) Ecocultural Attributes: Evaluating Ecological Degradation in Terms of Ecological Goods and Services versus Subsistence and Tribal Values. RiskAnalysis, 28, 1261-1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01093.x
[37]
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. (2009) Changes in Aleut Concerns Following the Stakeholder-Driven Amchitka Independent Science Assessment. RiskAnalysis, 29, 1156-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01191.x
[38]
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. (2007) Metals and Radionuclides in Birds and Eggs from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Bering Sea/Pacific Ocean Ecosystem. EnvironmentalMonitoringandAssessment, 127, 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9264-z
[39]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Burke, S., Jeitner, C.W., Jewett, S., Snigaroff, D., et al. (2006) Do Scientists and Fishermen Collect the Same Size Fish? Possible Implications for Exposure Assessment. EnvironmentalResearch, 101, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.07.003
[40]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M. and Jewett, S.C. (2007) Radionuclide Concentrations in Benthic Invertebrates from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Aleutian Chain, Alaska. EnvironmentalMonitoringandAssessment, 128, 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9316-4
[41]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Powers, C.W., Friedlander, B., Stabin, M., et al. (2007) Radionuclides in Marine Fishes and Birds from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Aleutians: Establishing a Baseline. HealthPhysics, 92, 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hp.0000248123.27888.d0
[42]
Dewitz, J. (2019) National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2016 Products (ver. 3.0, November 2023): U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P96HHBIE
[43]
Dewitz, J. and U.S. Geological Survey (2021) National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 Products (ver. 3.0, February 2024): U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KZCM54
[44]
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2024) Annual NLCD Collection 1 Science Products: U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P94UXNTS
[45]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Brown, K.G., Ng, K., Cortes, M. and Kosson, D. (2024) The Importance of Recognizing Buffer Zones to Lands Being Developed, Restored, or Remediated: On Planning for Protection of Ecological Resources. JournalofToxicologyandEnvironmentalHealth, PartA, 87, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2023.2285511
[46]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Brown, K.G., Cortes, M., Ng, K. and Kosson, D. (2024) Using the National Land Cover Database as an Indicator of Shrub-Steppe Habitat: Comparing Two Large United States Federal Lands with Surrounding Regions. JournalofToxicologyandEnvironmentalHealth, PartA, 88, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2024.2412659
[47]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Brown, K.G., Ng, K. and Kosson, D.S. (2026) A Rapid Method of Examining Land Use/Land Cover at Small Industrial Facilities Using Four U.S. Department of Energy Sites as Case Studies. Recent Progress in Science and Engineering, 2, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.21926/rpse.2601004
[48]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Brown, K.G., Cortes, M., Ng, K. and Kosson, D.S. (2025) Using National Land Cover Database as an Indicator of Successful Remediation: The Department of Energy’s Rocky Flats (Colorado) as a Case Study. JournalofToxicologyandEnvironmentalHealth, PartA, 89, Article ID: 2534616. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2025.2534616
[49]
Greenberg, M. (2022) Strategies to Be Prepared for a Risk Communication Crisis. RiskAnalysis, 42, 2354-2361. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14022
[50]
Siegrist, M. (2019) Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature. RiskAnalysis, 41, 480-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13325
[51]
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) (2003) Letter of Agreement to Parties Concerning Alaska from Director of Division of Air and Water Quality, Anchorage, Alaska.
[52]
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. (2011) Conceptual Environmental Justice Model for Evaluating Chemical Pathways of Exposure in Low-Income, Minority, Native American, and Other Unique Exposure Populations. AmericanJournalofPublicHealth, 101, S64-S73. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2010.300077
[53]
Benning, J.L., Barnes, D.L., Burger, J. and Kelley, J.J. (2009) Amchitka Island, Alaska: Moving towards Long Term Stewardship. PolarRecord, 45, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003224740800795x
[54]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Jeitner, C., Burke, S., Stamm, T., Snigaroff, R., et al. (2007) Mercury Levels and Potential Risk from Subsistence Foods from the Aleutians. ScienceoftheTotalEnvironment, 384, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.004
[55]
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. (2007) Risk to Consumers from Mercury in Pacific Cod (Gadus macrocephalus) from the Aleutians: Fish Age and Size Effects. EnvironmentalResearch, 105, 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.05.004
[56]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Shukla, T., Jeitner, C., Burke, S., Donio, M., et al. (2007) Heavy Metals in Pacific Cod (Gadusmacrocephalus) from the Aleutians: Location, Age, Size, and Risk. JournalofToxicologyandEnvironmentalHealth, PartA, 70, 1897-1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390701551159
[57]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Jeitner, C., Snigaroff, D., Snigaroff, R., Stamm, T., et al. (2008) Assessment of Metals in Down Feathers of Female Common Eiders and Their Eggs from the Aleutians: Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, and Selenium. EnvironmentalMonitoringandAssessment, 143, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9973-y
[58]
Hardell, S., Tilander, H., Welfinger-Smith, G., Burger, J. and Carpenter, D.O. (2010) Levels of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Three Organochlorine Pesticides in Fish from the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. PLOSONE, 5, e12396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012396
[59]
Department of Energy (DOE) (2025) Department of Energy Cleanup Sites. https://www.energy.gov/environmental-cleanup
[60]
Department of Energy-Legacy Management (DOE-EM) (2024) Rocky Flats Site, Colorado, Revegetation Plan. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management.
[61]
Department of Energy (DOE) (1996) Charting the Course: The Future Use Report. Department of Energy.
[62]
Havlick, D.G. (2018) Bombs Away: Militarization, Conservation, and Ecological Restoration. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226547688.001.0001
[63]
Mingione, J.E., Coon, J.J. and Miller, J.R. (2025) Evaluating Native Plant Community Characteristics after Restoration Efforts in Invaded Tallgrass Prairies. RangelandEcology&Management, 98, 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.07.015
[64]
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2020) Environmental Assessment: Improved Visitor Access to the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge. USFWS.
[65]
Jørgensen, S.E., Burkhard, B. and Müller, F. (2013) Twenty Volumes of Ecological Indicators—An Accounting Short Review. EcologicalIndicators, 28, 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.018
[66]
Renn, O. (2015) Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance. InternationalJournalofDisasterRiskScience, 6, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0037-6
Cappuyns, V. (2016) Inclusion of Social Indicators in Decision Support Tools for the Selection of Sustainable Site Remediation Options. JournalofEnvironmentalManagement, 184, 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.035
[69]
Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. and Goldstein, J. (2012) Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values. EcologicalEconomics, 74, 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
[70]
Chakraborty, J., Collins, T. and Grineski, S. (2016) Environmental Justice Research: Contemporary Issues and Emerging Topics. InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalResearchandPublicHealth, 13, Article No. 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111072
[71]
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M. and Pletnikoff, K. (2009) Collaboration versus Communication: The Department of Energy’s Amchitka Island and the Aleut Community. EnvironmentalResearch, 109, 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.01.002
[72]
Reichert, P., Langhans, S.D., Lienert, J. and Schuwirth, N. (2015) The Conceptual Foundation of Environmental Decision Support. JournalofEnvironmentalManagement, 154, 316-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.053
[73]
Zhao, J., Sun, L. and Zhou, C. (2024) Analysis of Ecological Environment Differences and Attribution between China and India. EcologicalIndicators, 164, Article ID: 112101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112101
[74]
Corro, L.M., Bagstad, K.J., Heris, M.P., Ibsen, P.C., Schleeweis, K.G., Diffendorfer, J.E., et al. (2025) An Enhanced National-Scale Urban Tree Canopy Cover Dataset for the United States. ScientificData, 12, Article No. 490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04816-0
