This paper examines irreversible market entry under uncertainty in a Cournot oligopoly framework. While standard static Cournot models imply that increased competition monotonically reduces deadweight loss, this paper shows that intensified competition can amplify dynamic welfare losses when entry is irreversible and demand conditions are uncertain. Using a real-options approach, we derive closed-form expressions for privately and socially optimal entry thresholds and demonstrate that the wedge between them increases with the number of firms. Although greater competition improves static allocative efficiency by lowering prices, it reduces private entry incentives more rapidly than social benefits, leading firms to delay entry inefficiently. As a result, dynamic welfare losses arising from delayed market creation grow even as static inefficiency vanishes. These findings highlight a fundamental tension between static and intertemporal welfare effects of competition.
References
[1]
Abel, A. B., & Eberly, J. C. (1996). Optimal Investment with Costly Reversibility. TheReviewofEconomicStudies,63, 581-593. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297794
[2]
Caballero, R. J. (1991). On the Sign of the Investment-Uncertainty Relationship. American Economic Review, 81, 279-288.
[3]
Cournot, A. A. (1838). Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Hachette.
[4]
Dixit, A. K. (1979). A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers. TheBellJournalofEconomics,10, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003317
[5]
Dixit, A. K. (1989). Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty. JournalofPoliticalEconomy,97, 620-638. https://doi.org/10.1086/261619
[6]
Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830176
[7]
Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1985). Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology. TheReviewofEconomicStudies,52, 383-401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297660
[8]
Grenadier, S. R. (1996). The Strategic Exercise of Options: Development Cascades and Overbuilding in Real Estate Markets. TheJournalofFinance,51, 1653-1679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05221.x
[9]
Grenadier, S. R. (2002). Option Exercise Games: An Application to the Equilibrium Investment Strategies of Firms. ReviewofFinancialStudies,15, 691-721. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.3.691
[10]
Leahy, J. V. (1993). Investment in Competitive Equilibrium: The Optimality of Myopic Behavior. TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics,108, 1105-1133. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118461
[11]
Mankiw, N. G., & Whinston, M. D. (1986). Free Entry and Social Inefficiency. TheRANDJournalofEconomics,17, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555627
[12]
McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The Value of Waiting to Invest. TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics,101, 707-727. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884175
[13]
Salop, S. C. (1979). Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods. TheBellJournalofEconomics,10, 141-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003323
[14]
Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press.
[15]
Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. MIT Press.