全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Dynamic Entry, Competition, and Welfare Loss under Uncertainty

DOI: 10.4236/tel.2026.162029, PP. 496-504

Keywords: Dynamic Entry, Cournot Competition, Real Options, Entry Timing, Welfare Loss

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper examines irreversible market entry under uncertainty in a Cournot oligopoly framework. While standard static Cournot models imply that increased competition monotonically reduces deadweight loss, this paper shows that intensified competition can amplify dynamic welfare losses when entry is irreversible and demand conditions are uncertain. Using a real-options approach, we derive closed-form expressions for privately and socially optimal entry thresholds and demonstrate that the wedge between them increases with the number of firms. Although greater competition improves static allocative efficiency by lowering prices, it reduces private entry incentives more rapidly than social benefits, leading firms to delay entry inefficiently. As a result, dynamic welfare losses arising from delayed market creation grow even as static inefficiency vanishes. These findings highlight a fundamental tension between static and intertemporal welfare effects of competition.

References

[1]  Abel, A. B., & Eberly, J. C. (1996). Optimal Investment with Costly Reversibility. The Review of Economic Studies, 63, 581-593.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297794
[2]  Caballero, R. J. (1991). On the Sign of the Investment-Uncertainty Relationship. American Economic Review, 81, 279-288.
[3]  Cournot, A. A. (1838). Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Hachette.
[4]  Dixit, A. K. (1979). A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 20-32.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003317
[5]  Dixit, A. K. (1989). Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 620-638.
https://doi.org/10.1086/261619
[6]  Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830176
[7]  Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1985). Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology. The Review of Economic Studies, 52, 383-401.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297660
[8]  Grenadier, S. R. (1996). The Strategic Exercise of Options: Development Cascades and Overbuilding in Real Estate Markets. The Journal of Finance, 51, 1653-1679.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05221.x
[9]  Grenadier, S. R. (2002). Option Exercise Games: An Application to the Equilibrium Investment Strategies of Firms. Review of Financial Studies, 15, 691-721.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.3.691
[10]  Leahy, J. V. (1993). Investment in Competitive Equilibrium: The Optimality of Myopic Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 1105-1133.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2118461
[11]  Mankiw, N. G., & Whinston, M. D. (1986). Free Entry and Social Inefficiency. The RAND Journal of Economics, 17, 48-58.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2555627
[12]  McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The Value of Waiting to Invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 707-727.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1884175
[13]  Salop, S. C. (1979). Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 141-156.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003323
[14]  Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press.
[15]  Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. MIT Press.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133