全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

FTA and Safety Monitoring Priorities for Third-Party Damage to Natural Gas Pipelines

DOI: 10.4236/epe.2026.184009, PP. 157-167

Keywords: Natural Gas Pipeline, FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) Method, Third-Party Damage, Minimal Cut Set, Minimal Path Set, Risk Prevention and Control

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

With the continuous expansion of natural gas pipeline networks, operational experience identifies third-party damage as the leading external cause of pipeline failure. To identify initial risks and clarify the accident causal chain, a Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) model for third-party damage is constructed, encompassing 22 basic events that systematically represent three risk categories: unsafe human acts, unsafe equipment conditions, and management deficiencies. Boolean algebra simplification yields 19 minimal cut sets and 2 minimal path sets. Structural importance ranking identifies 12 first-order cut sets as single-point failure risks requiring “zero tolerance” control; 6 second-order cut set events require paired failures to constitute risk, suggesting a dual-control mechanism integrating inspection and rectification; 4 fourth-order cut set events require quadruple factor combination to trigger accidents, manageable through integrated preventive measures. Based on these analytical results, a three-tier progressive prevention and control strategy is proposed—event logic bottlenecks, work management modes, and on-site treatment measures—providing scientific basis for precise safety monitoring, differentiated resource allocation, and emergency planning. This approach facilitates systematic reduction of third-party damage risks in natural gas pipelines, preventing catastrophic accidents.

References

[1]  National Energy Administration (2025) China Natural Gas Development Report (2025). Petroleum Industry Press.
[2]  Zhang, J., Zhang, Z.Q., Lin, Y.M., et al. (2025) Attribution of Unsafe Behaviors in Third-Party Construction of Natural Gas Pipelines and Prevention Strategies. Safety, 46, 80-85+137. (In Chinese)
[3]  Safety Management Committee of China City Gas Association (2024) National Gas Accident Analysis Report (Q3 2024). China Gas Safety Press.
[4]  You, Y., Gao, L.Z., Liu, J.C., et al. (2010) Application of Fault Tree Analysis in the Safe Operation of Urban Natural Gas Pipelines. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 29, 20-22. (In Chinese)
[5]  State Administration of Work Safety (2005) Safety Assessment. 3rd Edition, China Coal Industry Publishing House.
[6]  Shao, B.W. (2023) Research on Dynamic Risk Analysis and Accident Consequence Management of Third-Party Damage to Natural Gas Pipelines. Zhejiang Ocean University.
[7]  Ma, H.Q., Zhang, Y.Y. and Li, S. (2024) Safety System Engineering. Chemical Industry Press, 239.
[8]  Han, C. and Shi, L.Y. (2022) Risk Assessment of a Methanol Sodium Methanol Solution Project in a Chemical Enterprise. Coal and Chemical Industry, 45, 156-160. (In Chinese)

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133