全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Role of State Attorneys in Implementing Internationally Recognized Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2026.172019, PP. 333-347

Keywords: Human Rights, State Advocacy, Economic Social and Cultural Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Throughout its institutional development, the Italian State Attorney’s Office (Avvocatura dello Stato) has gone through several phases and is currently focused on defending the fundamental social human rights guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights. In Brazil, a similar function can and should be performed, with a view to international human rights instruments, both universal (the United Nations Charter and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights) and regional (the American Convention on Human Rights). This article examines the evolving role of state attorneys in ensuring compliance with internationally recognized economic, social, and cultural rights, drawing from the institutional experience of Italian State Attorneys and their Brazilian counterparts. Through analysis of landmark decisions by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, including the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay and Dismissed Congressional Workers v. Peru cases, this study demonstrates the growing judicial concern with enforcing second-generation rights at the international level. The article further explores the procedural mechanisms available to Brazilian federal state attorneys for implementing decisions of international human rights courts, highlighting the interplay between domestic and international legal frameworks and the critical importance of active state advocacy in safeguarding fundamental social rights during periods of economic crisis.

References

[1]  Advocacia-Geral da União (2025). AGU renova e amplia cooperação com Advocacia de Estado italiana.
https://www.gov.br/agu/pt-br/comunicacao/noticias/agu-renova-e-amplia-cooperacao-com-advocacia-de-estado-italiana
[2]  Avvocatura dello Stato (2024). Piano Integrato di Attività e Organizzazione 2024-2026.
https://www.avvocaturastato.it
[3]  Bobbio, N. (1992). The Age of Rights (C. N. Coutinho, Trans.). Campus Editora.
[4]  Carvalho Ramos, A. de. (2005). General Theory of Human Rights in the International Order. Ed. Renovar.
[5]  Carvalho Ramos, A. de. (2007). Human Rights. In D. Dimoulis (Ed.), Brazilian Dictionary of Constitutional Law (p. 128). Ed. Saraiva.
[6]  Carvalho Ramos, A. de. (2008). The Enforcement of Judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Brazil. In P. B. Casella, et al. (Eds.), International Law, Hu-manism, and Globality: Guido Fernandes Silva Soares—Amicorum Discipulorum Liber (pp. 451-468). Ed. Atlas.
[7]  Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) (1982). Advisory Opinion No. 1/82, “Other Treaties” Subject to the Consultative Jurisdiction of the Court. Series A No. 1.
http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_01_esp1.doc
[8]  Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) (2006a). Case of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay. Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of March 29, 2006. Series C No. 146.
[9]  Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) (2006b). Case of Dismissed Congressional Workers (Aguado Alfaro et al.) v. Peru. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2006. Series C No. 158.
[10]  Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) (2017). Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru. Pre-liminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of August 31, 2017. Series C No. 340.
[11]  Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) (2020). Case of the Indigenous Communities of the Lhaka Honhat Association v. Argentina. Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of February 6, 2020. Series C No. 400.
[12]  Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) (2024). Case of the Inhabitants of La Oroya v. Peru. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of March 22, 2024. Series C No. 511.
[13]  Kai, A. (2008). The General Part of International Criminal Law (C. E. A. Japiassú & D. A. Raizman, Trans.). Ed. Revista dos Tribunais.
[14]  Mello, J. D’A. B. V. de. (2012). Brazilian Public Advocacy and the Italian Avvocatura dello Stato. ANAJUR Newsletter, 7, 34-44.
[15]  Moraes, A. de. (2009). Constitutional Law (24th ed.). Atlas.
[16]  Peres Luño, A. (1995). Human Rights, Rule of Law, and Constitution (5th ed.). Tecnos.
[17]  Piovesan, F. (2005). Reforma do Poder Judiciário e Direitos Humanos. In A. R. Tavares, P. Lenza, & P. de J. L. Alarcón (Eds.), Reforma do Judiciário: Analisada e Comentada (p. 78). Método.
[18]  Rezek, J. F. (n.d.). International Law.
[19]  Sarlet, I. W. (2007). Social Rights. In D. Dimoulis (Ed.), Brazilian Dictionary of Constitutional Law (p. 132). Ed. Saraiva.
[20]  Trindade, A. A. C. (2005). The Humanization of International Law. Del Rey.
[21]  Wlasic, J. C. (n.d.). Manual Crítico de Derechos Humanos. La Ley.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133