全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
投递稿件

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Operational Cyberpsychology: Cognitive Targeting and Precision Influence in Contested Digital Environments

DOI: 10.4236/jis.2026.172006, PP. 70-105

Keywords: Cognitive Warfare, Operational Cyberpsychology, Behavioral Analytics, Influence Operations, Digital Phenotyping

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The 21st-century battlefield has shifted towards contests in cognition and information dominance, characterized by cognitive warfare leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing (QC), and behavioral analytics (BA) to manipulate human perception and decision-making. Operational cyberpsychology merges cognitive science, cyber capabilities, and behavioral insights to enable precision influence operations that exploit psychological vulnerabilities in digital environments. This paper advances the field by establishing an integrated framework linking AI-driven behavioral modeling, digital phenotyping, and social media intelligence (SOCMINT) to precision cognitive targeting, demonstrating how these technologies can be ethically implemented while maintaining compliance with APA professional practice guidelines. Techniques such as digital phenotyping and SOCMINT facilitate targeted messaging optimized for individual cognitive biases, transitioning influence campaigns from broad demographic targeting to precise cognitive interventions. The framework encompasses personnel selection optimization using specialized assessment tools, cross-cultural operational guidelines, and comprehensive metrics for evaluating cognitive influence effectiveness. While predictive models and adaptive systems provide real-time optimization for behavioral targeting, they demand robust ethical frameworks ensuring transparency, human oversight, and compliance with international law and psychological ethics. By combining cognitive insights and technical cyber expertise, operational cyberpsychology offers unparalleled strategic advantages in multi-domain operations. It remains essential to balance operational effectiveness with ethical obligations, ensuring the responsible application of these capabilities to protect human dignity, preserve cognitive liberty, and advance legitimate security objectives.

 References

[1]  Forescout Research-Vedere Labs (2025) Since Stuxnet: A History of Critical Infra-Structure Attacks.
https://www.forescout.com/blog/since-stuxnet-a-brief-history-of-critical-infrastructure-attacks/
[2]  Staal, M.A., Corey, D.M., Dean, P.J., DeMatteo, D., Krauss, D.A., Lewis, L.K., et al. (2025) Professional Practice Guidelines for Operational Psychology: An Executive Summary. American Psychologist, 80, 844-855.
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001499
[3]  American Psychological Association (2024) Artificial Intelligence and the Field of Psychology.
https://www.apa.org/about/policy/artificial-intelligence-psychology
[4]  U.S. Government Accountability Office (2024) High-Risk Series: Urgent Action Needed to Address Critical Cybersecurity Challenges Facing the Nation (GAO-24-107231).
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-107231
[5]  Cohen, D. and Bar’el, O. (2017) The Use of Cyberwarfare in Influence Operations. Yuval Ne’eman Workshop for Science, Technology, and Security. Tel Aviv, Tel-Aviv University.
https://en-cyber.tau.ac.il/sites/cyberstudies-english.tau.ac.il/files/media_server/cyber%20center/cyber-center/Cyber_Cohen_Barel_ENG.pdf
[6]  Kritika, M. (2025) A Comprehensive Study on Navigating Neuroethics in Cyberspace. AI and Ethics, 5, 93-100.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00486-7
[7]  Emond, B. and West, R.L. (2003) Cyberpsychology: A Human-Interaction Perspective Based on Cognitive Modeling. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 527-536.
https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103769710550
[8]  McNeese, M.D. and Hall, D.L. (2017) The Cognitive Sciences of Cyber-Security: A Framework for Advancing Socio-Cyber Systems. In: Liu, P., Jajodia, S. and Wang, C., Eds., Theory and Models for Cyber Situation Awareness, Springer, 173-202.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61152-5_7
[9]  Wiederhold, B.K. (2025) The Rise of Synthetic Societies: Is There a Role for Humans? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 28, 224-226.
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2025.0067
[10]  Gutzwiller, R.S., Hunt, S.M. and Lange, D.S. (2016) A Task Analysis toward Characterizing Cyber-Cognitive Situation Awareness (CCSA) in Cyber Defense Analysts. 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), San Diego, 21-25 March 2016, 14-20.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cogsima.2016.7497780
[11]  De Zoysa, S. (2024) Neuroscience of Persuasion: Understanding Brain Mechanisms in Psychological Operations.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sayonara-De-Zoysa/publication/383157275_Neurosci-ence_of_Persuasion_Understanding_Brain_Mechanisms_in_Psychological_Operations/links/66bf30d0311cbb09493eb528/Neuroscience-of-Persuasion-Understanding-Brain-Mechanisms-in-Psychological-Operations.pdf
[12]  Steeds, M. and Clinch, S. (2025) On Cyberpsychology and Human-Computer Interactions. In: Wright, M.F., Ed., Research Handbook on Cyberpsychology, Edward Elgar Publishing, 8-54.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803929484.00006
[13]  Piazza, J. and Bering, J.M. (2009) Evolutionary Cyber-Psychology: Applying an Evolutionary Framework to Internet Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1258-1269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002
[14]  Parsons, T.D. (2017) Cyberpsychology and the Brain: The Interaction of Neuroscience and Affective Computing. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316151204
[15]  Tovo, K., Spitaletta, J., Rhem, S., Linera, R., Seese, G., Martin, M. and Greenlee, M. (2016) White Paper on Bio Psycho Social Applications to Cognitive Engagement (No. SECDEFSMA).
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/AD1092269/
[16]  Camacho, E., Brady, R.O., Lizano, P., Keshavan, M. and Torous, J. (2021) Advancing Translational Research through the Interface of Digital Phenotyping and Neuroimaging: A Narrative Review. Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry, 4, Article ID: 100032.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bionps.2021.100032
[17]  Parker, S., Gupta, S. and Lee, H. (2024) Digital Cognitive Enhancement and Decline: A Neuropsychological Perspective. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 36, 789-805.
[18]  ElSayary, A. and Ragab, J.K. (2025) Digital Neuroplasticity: How Prolonged Technology Use Reshapes Neural Pathways over Time. Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics, 25-28 March 2025, 158-164.
https://doi.org/10.54808/imcic2025.01.158
[19]  Insel, T.R. (2017) Digital Phenotyping: Technology for a New Science of Behavior. JAMA, 318, 1215-1216.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11295
[20]  Onnela, J. and Rauch, S.L. (2016) Harnessing Smartphone-Based Digital Phenotyping to Enhance Behavioral and Mental Health. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41, 1691-1696.
https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.7
[21]  Yang, Z., Heaukulani, C., Sim, A., Buddhika, T., Abdul Rashid, N.A., Wang, X., et al. (2025) Utility of Digital Phenotyping Based on Wrist Wearables and Smartphones in Psychosis: Observational Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 13, e56185.
https://doi.org/10.2196/56185
[22]  Liu, Y., Yue, K. and Liu, Y. (2024) Behavioral Analysis in Immersive Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. arXiv: 2405.03442.
[23]  Nonum, E.O., Avwokuruaye, O. and Umar, A.M. (2025) Social Engineering: Understanding Human Factors in Cyber Security. International Journal of Convergent and Informatics Science Research, 7, 155-171.
https://doi.org/10.70382/hijcisr.v07i9.032
[24]  Costa Netto, Y. and Maçada, A.C.G. (2019) The Influence of Social Media Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers on Its Identity Construction.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rip/65
[25]  Janhonen, J. (2023) Socialisation Approach to AI Value Acquisition: Enabling Flexible Ethical Navigation with Built-In Receptiveness to Social Influence. AI and Ethics, 5, 527-553.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00372-8
[26]  Fogg, B.J. (2002) Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Ubiquity, 2002, 2.
https://doi.org/10.1145/764008.763957
[27]  American Psychological Association (2023) Professional Practice Guidelines for Operational Psychology.
https://www.apa.org/about/policy/operational-psychology.pdf
[28]  Levine, M. (2025) A Golden Age of Behavioural Social Psychology? Towards a Social Psychology of Power and Intergroup Relations in the Digital Age. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64, e12896.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12896
[29]  Hofstede, G. (2011) Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2, Article 8.
https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
[30]  Chen, Y. (2025) The Impact of Behavioral Economics on Consumer Decision-Making in the Digital Era. Advances in Management and Intelligent Technologies, 1, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.62177/amit.v1i3.391
[31]  Obioha-Val, O.A., Olaniyi, O.O., Gbadebo, M.O., Balogun, A.Y. and Olisa, A.O. (2025) Cyber Espionage in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of State-Sponsored Campaign. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 18, 184-204.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i1557
[32]  Zhang, J., Song, W. and Liu, Y. (2025) Cognitive Bias in Generative AI Influences Religious Education. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 15720.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99121-6
[33]  Shevchenko, Y., von Helversen, B. and Scheibehenne, B. (2014) Change and Status Quo in Decisions with Defaults: The Effect of Incidental Emotions Depends on the Type of Default. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 287-296.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500005817
[34]  Marković, S., Popović, G. and Andjelković, L. (2024) Mastering the Attention Economy: Strategies for Competing on Digital Platforms. Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal, 5, 568-578.
https://doi.org/10.63995/pgje3232
[35]  Nye, C.D., Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Kubisiak, U.C., White, L.A. and Jose, I. (2012) Assessing the Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) as an MOS Qualification Instrument (No. ARITR1312).
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA566090.pdf
[36]  Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2018) Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures (5th ed.).
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frederick-Oswald/publication/330544995_Princi-ples_for_the_Validation_and_Use_of_Personnel_Selection_Procedures/links/5d0c1164a6fdcc246297bb60/Principles-for-the-Validation-and-Use-of-Personnel-Selection-Procedures.pdf
[37]  Trippe, D.M., Moriarty, K.O., Russell, T.L., Carretta, T.R. and Beatty, A.S. (2014) Development of a Cyber/information Technology Knowledge Test for Military Enlisted Technical Training Qualification. Military Psychology, 26, 182-198.
https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000042
[38]  Shewach, O.R., Ingerick, M., Butterfuss, R., Carretta, T.R. and Persing, C. (2023) Optimizing Qualification to US Space Force Spacepower Disciplines.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1212816.pdf
[39]  Lingfeng, H. (2024) Military Information Support Operations. In: Kan, Z., Ed., The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology, Springer, 920-922.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7874-4_1303
[40]  White, M.M. (2025) Terrorism: Psychological Warfare Of. In: Shackelford, T., Ed., Encyclopedia of Religious Psychology and Behavior, Springer, 1-3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_1917-1
[41]  Martins, G.D.G., Caricati, V.V., Barbugli, B.C., da Silva Ribeiro, C.M., Lobato, F.B.H., Scatena, A., et al. (2021) The Biopsychosocial Impact of Abusive Use of Digital Media. In: De Micheli, D., Andrade, A.L.M., Reichert, R.A., Silva, E.A.D., Pinheiro, B.D.O. and Lopes, F.M., Eds., Drugs and Human Behavior, Springer, 459-468.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62855-0_33
[42]  Troublefield, T.C. (2025) Strategic Military Information Support Operations for Countering Digital Terrorist Threat Networks. Journal of Applied Security Research, 20, 586-602.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2025.2498446
[43]  Vandegrift, S., Canan, M. and Shives, T. (2025) The Roles of PA and MISO in Modern Warfare. International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 20, 476-483.
https://doi.org/10.34190/iccws.20.1.3500
[44]  Omand, D., Bartlett, J. and Miller, C. (2019) Introducing social media intelligence (SOCMINT). In: Andrew, C., Aldrich, R.J. and Wark, W.K., Eds., Secret Intelligence, Routledge, 77-94.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429029028-7
[45]  Yu, S. (2023) Cyber Profiling: Predicting Political Orientation with SOCMINT. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 10, Article ID: 100058.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100058
[46]  Torous, J., Linardon, J., Goldberg, S.B., Sun, S., Bell, I., Nicholas, J., et al. (2025) The Evolving Field of Digital Mental Health: Current Evidence and Implementation Issues for Smartphone Apps, Generative Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality. World Psychiatry, 24, 156-174.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21299
[47]  Graphika & Stanford Internet Observatory (2022) Unheard Voice: Evaluating Five Years of Pro-Western Covert Influence Operations. Stanford Digital Repository.
https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:nj914nx9540/unheard-voice-tt.pdf
[48]  Boyd, B. and Lin, H. (2019) Affecting the Cognitive Dimension of the Information Environment through Cyber-Enabled Information Operations. Journal of Information Warfare, 18, 49-66.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26894681
[49]  Tariq, M.U., Babar, M., Poulin, M., Khattak, A.S., Alshehri, M.D. and Kaleem, S. (2021) Human Behavior Analysis Using Intelligent Big Data Analytics. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 686610.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686610
[50]  Cacioppo, J.T., Cacioppo, S. and Petty, R.E. (2017) The Neuroscience of Persuasion: A Review with an Emphasis on Issues and Opportunities. Social Neuroscience, 13, 129-172.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1273851
[51]  Gokhman, D., Harris, K.D., Carmi, S. and Greenbaum, G. (2025) Predicting the Direction of Phenotypic Difference. Nature Communications, 16, Article No. 6898.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62355-z
[52]  Vankhede, P. and Kumar, S. (2024) Predictive Analytics for Website User Behavior Analysis. 2024 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), Bhopal, 24-25 February 2024, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1109/sceecs61402.2024.10482298
[53]  Venkateswaran, P.S. and Mm, S. (2025) Predictive Analytics: Utilizing Machine Learning and Big Data for Forecasting Future Trends in Business and Consumer Behavior. In: Hussain, Z., Salehhuddin Sharipudin, M.N., Albattat, A. and Khan, A., Eds., Strategic Brand Management in the Age of AI and Disruption, IGI Global, 463-492.
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9461-8.ch019
[54]  Moreira, T. and Carvalho, L. (2024) Legal and Regulatory Considerations in Cyber-security and Information Assurance: Managing Privacy, Responsibility, and Compliance in Digital Systems. Journal of Applied Computational Science, Numerical Methods, and Scientific Computing in Engineering, 14, 1-15.
https://soloncouncil.com/index.php/JACSNMSCE/article/download/2024-nov-04/8
[55]  Kshetri, N. and Alcantara, L.L. (2015) Cyber-Threats and Cybersecurity Challenges: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. In: Holden, N., Michailova, S. and Tietze, S., Eds., The Routledge Companion to Cross-Cultural Management, Routledge, 285-293.
[56]  White, C.J., Baimel, A. and Norenzayan, A. (2021) How Cultural Learning and Cognitive Biases Shape Religious Beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 34-39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.033
[57]  Hedrih, V. (2019) Adapting Psychological Tests and Measurement Instruments for Cross-Cultural Research: An Introduction. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264788
[58]  Troublefield, T.C. (2025) The Cyberpsychology of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Cybersecurity: A Human-Centric Approach to Policy Development. Journal of Information Security, 16, 158-183.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jis.2025.161009
[59]  Ohu, F. and Jones, L. (2025) The Intersection of Cyberwarfare, Social Media, and Adolescent Self-Esteem: A Forensic Cyberpsychology Analysis. International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 20, 332-344.
https://doi.org/10.34190/iccws.20.1.3375
[60]  Maynard, A., Corey, C., Greaves, A., Kozar, M., Kwon, K.H. and Scragg, M. (2022) Conducting Socially Responsible and Ethical Counter Influence Operations Research: A Practical Guide for Researchers and Practitioners.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/trecms/AD1221500/
[61]  Bodenstein, K.C., Paquin, V., Sekhon, K., Lesage, M., Cinalioglu, K., Rej, S., et al. (2023) Digital Markers of Mental Health Problems: Phenotyping across Biological, Psychological, and Environmental Dimensions. In: Teixeira, A.L., Rocha, N.P. and Berk, M., Eds., Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry, Springer, 105-122.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43356-6_7
[62]  Hudon, A., Harvey, E., Nicolas, S., Dufour, M., Guérin-Thériault, C., Bérubé-Fortin, J., et al. (2025) Cyberpsychopathy: A Multidimensional Framework for Understanding Psychopathic Traits in Digital Environments. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15, Article 107.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060107
[63]  Razian, M., Fathian, M., Bahsoon, R., Toosi, A.N. and Buyya, R. (2022) Service Composition in Dynamic Environments: A Systematic Review and Future Directions. Journal of Systems and Software, 188, Article ID: 111290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111290
[64]  Larson, E.V., Darilek, R.E., Gibran, D., Nichiporuk, B., Richardson, A., Schwartz, L.H. and Thurston, C.Q. (2009) Foundations of Effective Influence Operations: A Framework for Enhancing Army Capabilities.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA503375/
[65]  Patchipala, S.G. (2023) Tackling Data and Model Drift in AI: Strategies for Maintaining Accuracy during ML Model Inference. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 10, 1198-1209.
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.10.2.0855
[66]  Klos, V., Gothel, T. and Glesner, S. (2016) Formal Models for Analysing Dynamic Adaptation Behaviour in Real-Time Systems. 2016 IEEE 1st International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self Systems (FAS*W), Augsburg, 12-16 September 2016, 106-111.
https://doi.org/10.1109/fas-w.2016.34
[67]  American Psychological Association (2023) Informing the Role of Congress in Artificial Intelligence Regulation.
https://www.apaservices.org/advocacy/news/congress-artificial-intelligence-regulation
[68]  Kritika, E.M. (2024) Neuroethical Quandaries at the Crossroads of Cyberspace. Scientific Practical Cyber Security Journal, 8, 57-63.
https://journal.scsa.ge/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/0017_neuroethical-quandaries-at-the-crossroads-of-cyberspace.pdf
[69]  Bose, R. and Glasgow, K. (2025) AI-Based Replication of Human Moral Judgements: Moral Proxies for Multidomain Operations. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications VII, Orlando, 14-17 April 2025, 9-20.
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3053725
[70]  Minici, M., Luceri, L., Fabbri, F. and Ferrara, E. (2025) IOHunter: Graph Foundation Model to Uncover Online Information Operations. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39, 28258-28266.
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i27.35046
[71]  Spitaletta, J.A. (2021) Operational Cyberpsychology: Adapting a Special Operations Model for Cyber Operations.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/trecms/AD1154566/
[72]  Jensen, B. (2025) Cyber Crisis Management in Non-Military Warfare. In: Jonsson, O. and Käihkö, I., Eds., Non-Military Warfare, Routledge, 90-118.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003616993-5
[73]  Rich, M. (2025) Cyberpsychology: Integrating Cyber Behavioral Sciences with Adaptive Environments for Enhanced Cyber Deception. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 7-10 January 2025, 1136-1145.
https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2025.135
[74]  Claverie, B. and Du Cluzel, F. (2022) The Cognitive Warfare Concept.
https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CW-article-Claverie-du-Cluzel-final_0.pdf
[75]  Herberger, K. (2025) Mind Warfare: Psychological Operations and the Inducement of Psychosis in Military Strategy. Kathlene Herberger.
[76]  Schmitt, M.N. (2013) Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Cambridge University Press.
https://www.penncerl.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/6481-tallinn-manual-on-the-international-law-applicable.pdf
[77]  Schmitt, M.N. (2017) Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press.
https://csrcl.huji.ac.il/sites/default/files/csrcl/files/9781107177222_frontmatter.pdf
[78]  Pagallo, U. (2014) Cyber Force and the Role of Sovereign States in Informational Warfare. Philosophy & Technology, 28, 407-425.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0177-4
[79]  Yager, M. (2018) What Do Others Think/How Do We Know What the Think? NSI.
https://www.nsiteam.com/nsi-publications/what-do-others-think-how-dow-we-know-what-they-think
[80]  Roberts, A. and Venables, A. (2024) Military Psychological Operations in the Digital Battlespace: A Practical Application of the Legal Framework. 2024 16th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Over the Horizon (CyCon), Tallinn, 28-31 May 2024, 281-296.
https://doi.org/10.23919/cycon62501.2024.10685605
[81]  Tims, F.M., Sorensen, R.C., Mushal, F.C. and Morgan Jr., J.T. (1975) New Indicators of Psychological Operations Effects (No. OADACR114).
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA015004/
[82]  Santa Maria, S.D. (2013) Improving Influence Operations by Defining Influence and Influence Operations (No. ATZLSWV).
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA606282/
[83]  Gupta, P., Sharma, S. and Sharma, T. (2025) Big Data Analytics in Behavior Analysis. In: Chhabra, G., Singh, T. and Kumar, M., Eds., Mapping Human Data and Behavior with the Internet of Behavior (IoB), IGI Global, 205-238.
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7545-7.ch009
[84]  Kim, K., Sin, S.J. and Yoo-Lee, E. (2021) Use and Evaluation of Information from Social Media: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Library & Information Science Research, 43, Article ID: 101104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101104
[85]  Pijpers, P. (2022) Towards a Legal Framework for Influence Operations in Cyberspace. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4112370
[86]  Staal, M.A. (2026) Operational Psychology and National Security. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003564195
[87]  Wallace, R. (2019) Cognitive Dynamics on Clausewitz Landscapes: The Control and Directed Evolution of Organized Conflict. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26424-6
[88]  Couretas, J.M. (2022) Measures of Cyber Performance and Effectiveness. In: Couretas, J.M., Ed., An Introduction to Cyber Analysis and Targeting, Springer, 197-219.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88559-5_9
[89]  Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. and Graepel, T. (2013) Private Traits and Attributes Are Predictable from Digital Records of Human Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 5802-5805.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110
[90]  Başaran, S. and Ejimogu, O.H. (2021) A Neural Network Approach for Predicting Personality from Facebook Data. Sage Open, 11.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032156
[91]  Orrù, G., Monaro, M., Conversano, C., Gemignani, A. and Sartori, G. (2020) Machine Learning in Psychometrics and Psychological Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2970.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02970

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133