Superior mechanical performance, durability, and resistance to crack propagation in high-performance mortars are increasingly being achieved with the optimization of supplementary cementitious materials combined with fiber reinforcement. However, quantification of combined effects due to the addition of silica fume, class F fly ash, and polypropylene fibers is rather limited. This paper compares the performance of mortar systems containing silica fume, class F fly ash, and polypropylene fibers at various dosages, controlled by low water-to-binder ratios. Ternary and quaternary mixes were prepared to isolate the effects of each constituent and their interactions on compressive strength, flexural behavior, and microstructural density at 1, 7, and 28 days. Test results showed that silica fume significantly enhanced early and 28-day strength through matrix densification, while class F fly ash contributed to workability and later-age strength development through pozzolanic activity. Low dosages of polypropylene fibers did not significantly affect compressive strength; however, they significantly enhanced crack resistance, toughness, and post-crack behavior, especially when combined with silica fume-rich matrices. Synergetic effects have been observed in mixes containing both silica fume and class F fly ash, in which improved packing density and balanced hydration kinetics resulted in superior mechanical and microstructural performance. The results emphasize the importance of optimized SCM-fiber combinations toward achieving high performance in mortars and provide guidelines for the design of durable and high-strength mortar systems for advanced construction applications.
References
[1]
Mehta, P.K. and Monteiro, P.J.M. (2014) Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. McGraw-Hill Education.
[2]
Bentz, D.P., Ferraris, C.F., Galler, M.A., Hansen, A.S. and Guynn, J.M. (2011) Influence of Silica Fume on Cement Hydration. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 1224-1232.
[3]
ACI Committee 232 (2017) Use of Fly Ash in Concrete (ACI 232R-17). American Concrete Institute.
[4]
Thomas, M.D.A. (2007) Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete. Portland Cement Association. https://www.cement.org
[5]
Afroughsabet, V. and Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2016) Mechanical and Durability Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 122, 14-26.
[6]
Neville, A.M. (2011) Properties of Concrete. 5th Edition, Pearson Education.
Güneyisi, E., Gesoğlu, M. and Özturan, T. (2004) Properties of High-Strength Mortars Incorporating Mineral Admixtures. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 2221-2231.
[9]
Bencardino, F., Rizzuti, L., Spadea, G. and Swamy, R.N. (2015) Stress-Strain Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete in Compression. Composite Structures, 131, 102-111.
[10]
Banthia, N. and Trottier, J.-F. (1994) Concrete Reinforced with Polypropylene Fibers. ACI Materials Journal, 91, 1-8.
[11]
ASTM International (2022) Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM C150/C150M.
[12]
ASTM International (2020) Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures. ASTM C1240.
[13]
ASTM International (2022) Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM C618.
[14]
ASTM International (2006) Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. ASTM C305.
[15]
ASTM International (2021) Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. ASTM C109/C109M.
[16]
British Standards Institution (2019) Testing Hardened Concrete—Making and Curing Specimens for Strength Tests. BS EN 12390-2.
[17]
British Standards Institution (2019) Testing Hardened Concrete—Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. BS EN 12390-3.
[18]
Arshad, M.T., Khan, M.I., Zhang, D. and Ahmad, A. (2021) Synergistic Use of Fly Ash and Silica Fume in High-Strength Mortars. Materials, 14, Article 6843.