The spatio-temporal evolution of wall-bounded turbulence is characterized by high nonlinearity, multi-scale dynamics, and chaotic nature, making its accurate prediction a significant challenge for flow control and drag reduction. This paper proposes a hybrid deep learning model, CAE-VAE-LSTM, for the spatio-temporal prediction of wall turbulence. The model first employs a Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) to extract high-dimensional spatial features and perform dimensionality reduction of the flow fields. Subsequently, a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is integrated to map these features into a probabilistic latent space, enhancing the model’s robustness and its ability to capture the inherent stochasticity of turbulence through the reparameterization trick. Finally, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network is utilized to model the temporal evolution within the latent space, enabling recursive prediction of future flow states. Experimental results based on Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) data demonstrate that the CAE-VAE-LSTM model can accurately reconstruct and predict the evolution of coherent structures, such as low-speed streaks, while maintaining high physical fidelity and long-term stability. Compared to traditional deterministic models, this hybrid architecture exhibits superior performance in capturing statistical properties and nonlinear dynamics, providing an efficient data-driven framework for real-time turbulence simulation and active flow control.
References
[1]
Cordier, L., El Majd, B.A. and Favier, J. (2009) Calibration of POD Reduced‐order Models Using Tikhonov Regularization. InternationalJournalforNumericalMethodsinFluids, 63, 269-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2074
[2]
Buoso, S., Manzoni, A., Alkadhi, H. and Kurtcuoglu, V. (2022) Stabilized Reduced-Order Models for Unsteady Incompressible Flows in Three-Dimensional Parametrized Domains. Computers&Fluids, 246, Article ID: 105604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105604
[3]
Dias Ribeiro, M., Stradtner, M. and Bekemeyer, P. (2023) Unsteady Reduced Order Model with Neural Networks and Flight-Physics-Based Regularization for Aerodynamic Applications. Computers&Fluids, 264, Article ID: 105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105949
[4]
Schmid, P.J. (2010) Dynamic Mode Decomposition of Numerical and Experimental Data. JournalofFluidMechanics, 656, 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112010001217
[5]
Srinivasan, P.A., Guastoni, L., Azizpour, H., Schlatter, P. and Vinuesa, R. (2019) Predictions of Turbulent Shear Flows Using Deep Neural Networks. PhysicalReviewFluids, 4, Article ID: 054603. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.4.054603
[6]
Portal-Porras, K., Fernandez-Gamiz, U., Ugarte-Anero, A., Zulueta, E. and Zulueta, A. (2021) Alternative Artificial Neural Network Structures for Turbulent Flow Velocity Field Prediction. Mathematics, 9, Article 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161939
[7]
Xie, C., Wang, J., Li, K. and Ma, C. (2019) Artificial Neural Network Approach to Large-Eddy Simulation of Compressible Isotropic Turbulence. PhysicalReviewE, 99, Article ID: 053113. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.99.053113
[8]
Arvind, M., Don, D., Michael, C. and Daniel, L. (2019) Compressed Convolutional LSTM: An Efficient Deep Learning Framework to Model High Fidelity 3D Turbulence. arXiv: 1903.00033.
[9]
Wang, H., Liu, Y. and Wang, S. (2022) Dense Velocity Reconstruction from Particle Image Velocimetry/Particle Tracking Velocimetry Using a Physics-Informed Neural Network. PhysicsofFluids, 34, Article ID: 017116. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0078143
[10]
Kaandorp, M.L.A. and Dwight, R.P. (2020) Data-Driven Modelling of the Reynolds Stress Tensor Using Random Forests with Invariance. Computers&Fluids, 202, Article ID: 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104497
[11]
Fukami, K., Fukagata, K. and Taira, K. (2019) Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Turbulent Flows with Machine Learning. JournalofFluidMechanics, 870, 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.238
[12]
Nakamura, T., Fukami, K., Hasegawa, K., Nabae, Y. and Fukagata, K. (2021) Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory Based Reduced Order Surrogate for Minimal Turbulent Channel Flow. Physics of Fluids, 33, Article ID: 025116. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039845
[13]
Borrelli, G., Guastoni, L., Eivazi, H., Schlatter, P. and Vinuesa, R. (2022) Predicting the Temporal Dynamics of Turbulent Channels through Deep Learning. InternationalJournalofHeatandFluidFlow, 96, Article ID: 109010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.109010
[14]
Racca, A., Doan, N.A.K. and Magri, L. (2023) Predicting Turbulent Dynamics with the Convolutional Autoencoder Echo State Network. JournalofFluidMechanics, 975, A2. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.716
[15]
Yuan, Z., Wang, Y., Xie, C. and Wang, J. (2021) Deconvolutional Artificial-Neural-Network Framework for Subfilter-Scale Models of Compressible Turbulence. ActaMechanicaSinica, 37, 1773-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-021-01150-7
[16]
Yao, S., Zhao, W., Wu, C. and Chen, W. (2023) Nonlinear Constitutive Calculation Method of Rarefied Flow Based on Deep Convolution Neural Networks. PhysicsofFluids, 35, Article ID: 096103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0165035
[17]
Han, R., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. and Chen, G. (2019) A Novel Spatial-Temporal Prediction Method for Unsteady Wake Flows Based on Hybrid Deep Neural Network. PhysicsofFluids, 31, Article ID: 127101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5127247
[18]
Fan, B.Y., Yuan, Z.L., Wang, Y.P. and Wang, J.C. (2023) Eddy Viscosity Enhanced Temporal Direct Deconvolution Models for Temporal Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 35, Article ID: 065126.
[19]
Deng, Z., Chen, Y., Liu, Y. and Kim, K.C. (2019) Time-Resolved Turbulent Velocity Field Reconstruction Using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-Based Artificial Intelligence Framework. PhysicsofFluids, 31, Article ID: 075108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111558
[20]
Yousif, M.Z., Zhang, M., Yu, L., Vinuesa, R. and Lim, H. (2023) A Transformer-Based Synthetic-Inflow Generator for Spatially Developing Turbulent Boundary Layers. JournalofFluidMechanics, 957, A6. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.1088
[21]
Geneva, N. and Zabaras, N. (2022) Transformers for Modeling Physical Systems. NeuralNetworks, 146, 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.11.022