Design of an Intelligent Campus Surveillance System, Based on Cognitive Security and the Internet of Things, for the Detection of Suspicious Activities
University campus security has become a major issue with the increasing digitization and interconnection of infrastructure. This article proposes the design of an intelligent surveillance system based on a cognitive security approach integrating the Internet of Things (IoT). The model combines computer vision, behavioral analysis, and machine learning to detect suspicious movements and abnormal behavior in real time. IoT sensors collect data from multiple sources (videos, motion detectors, access control devices), while the cognitive layer provides contextual interpretation and adaptive decision-making. The proposed architecture aims to improve responsiveness, detection accuracy, and resilience against physical and cyber threats, while respecting the confidentiality and reliability constraints inherent in smart environments.
References
[1]
Alia, A. (2023) Effect of Cybersecurity Awareness among Students in the Education Framework Using the Internet, E-Learning Platforms and Social Networks. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 12, 72-78. https://doi.org/10.24203/ijcit.v12i2.350
[2]
Armas, R. and Taherdoost, H. (2025) Building a Cybersecurity Culture in Higher Education: Proposing a Cybersecurity Awareness Paradigm. Information, 16, 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050336
[3]
Titi, K.M.I. (2025) Comprehensive Analysis of Cybersecurity Awareness among Students’ Universities. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5201990
[4]
Kandula, S.R., Kassetty, N., ALANG, K.S. and Pandey, P. (2024) Context-Aware Multi-Factor Authentication in Zero Trust Architecture: Enhancing Security through Adaptive Authentication. International Journal of Global Innovations and Solutions. https://doi.org/10.21428/e90189c8.f525ef41
[5]
Liu, Y. (2024) Analysis of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Schemes in Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): Current State, Challenges, and Future Trends. International Journal of Computer Applications, 186, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2024924310
[6]
Marafo, M.P., Palayen, B., Kiniway, J.S., Dulagan, G., Bugalin, F., Bacasen, J. and Guaki, G.S. (2024) Zero Trust Security in WFA Platforms: A Literature Review of Principles, Challenges and Best Practices. Southeast Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 9-17.
[7]
Metin, B., Özhan, F.G. and Wynn, M. (2024) Zero Trust Cybersecurity: Critical Success Factors and A Maturity Assessment Framework.
[8]
Moustafa, A.A., Bello, A. and Maurushat, A. (2021) The Role of User Behaviour in Improving Cyber Security Management. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 561011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.561011
[9]
Mony, V.O., Ikoha, A.P. and Maroko, R.O. (2025) An Intelligent Zero Trust Architecture Model for Mitigating Authentication Threats and Vulnerabilities in Cloud-Based Services. Journal of Cyber Security, 7, 395-415. https://doi.org/10.32604/jcs.2025.070952
[10]
Sapanca, H.F. and Kanbul, S. (2022) Risk Management in Digitalized Educational Environments: Teachers’ Information Security Awareness Levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 986561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986561