全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Explainable AI: Enhancing Clinician Trust and Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

DOI: 10.4236/jilsa.2026.182006, PP. 91-104

Keywords: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Prostate Cancer

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men worldwide and achieving an accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for guiding appropriate treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, has been increasingly applied to clinical, imaging, and histopathological data to enhance diagnostic accuracy. These approaches have shown strong potential in detecting complex patterns within medical datasets that may not be easily captured using traditional statistical methods. Nevertheless, despite the growing number of AI-based diagnostic models proposed in the literature, their adoption in routine clinical practice remains limited. This is largely due to concerns related to transparency, interpretability, reliability, and the extent to which clinicians can understand and trust automated decision-making systems. To address these limitations, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a promising direction aimed at improving the interpretability of predictive models without compromising performance. In this study, an XAI-based framework for prostate cancer diagnosis is developed by integrating ensemble learning with post-hoc explanation techniques. Multiple classifiers, including decision trees, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks, were combined within an ensemble strategy to leverage their complementary strengths and enhance overall predictive capability. To ensure model transparency, explanation methods such as SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) and feature importance analysis were employed to quantify and illustrate the contribution of each variable to the final prediction. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed ensemble XAI framework achieves superior diagnostic accuracy compared with individual classifiers while also providing clear and clinically meaningful explanations of its decisions. These findings highlight the value of incorporating explainability into machine learning models to strengthen clinician trust, support responsible AI deployment, and enable more informed and reliable decision-making in prostate cancer management.

References

[1]  Khan, T., Altamimi, M.A., Hussain, A., Ramzan, M., Ashique, S., Alhuzani, M.R., et al. (2022) Understanding of PSA Biology, Factors Affecting PSA Detection, Challenges, Various Biomarkers, Methods, and Future Perspective of Prostate Cancer Detection and Diagnosis. Advances in Cancer Biology—Metastasis, 5, Article ID: 100059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adcanc.2022.100059
[2]  Kania, E., Janica, M., Nesterowicz, M., Modzelewski, W., Cybulski, M. and Janica, J. (2025) Advances and Challenges in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers, 17, Article 2137.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132137
[3]  Knapič, S., Malhi, A., Saluja, R. and Främling, K. (2021) Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Human Decision Support System in the Medical Domain. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 3, 740-770.
https://doi.org/10.3390/make3030037
[4]  Niu, S., Yin, Q., Ma, J., Song, Y., Xu, Y., Bai, L., et al. (2024) Enhancing Healthcare Decision Support through Explainable AI Models for Risk Prediction. Decision Support Systems, 181, Article ID: 114228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2024.114228
[5]  Dhivya, V., Yadalam, P.K., Sri Shivasankari, T., Ayyachamy, S. and Anegundi, R.V. (2025) PSA-Based Machine Learning Model in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. In: Agarwal, S., Lakshmi, D. and Singh, L., Eds., Navigating Innovations and Challenges in Travel Medicine and Digital Health, IGI Global, 219-236.
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8774-0.ch011
[6]  Bhise, S., Bepari, S., Gadekar, S., Kale, D., Singh Gaur, A. and Aswale, S. (2021) Breast Cancer Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 10, 98-103.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353285629
[7]  Karrar, A.E. and Elarabi, R. (2023) An Intelligent Machine Learning-Based System for Predicting Heart Disease Using Mixed Feature Creation Technique. In: Saeed, F., Mohammed, F., Mohammed, E., Al-Hadhrami, T. and Al-Sarem, M., Eds., Advances on Intelligent Computing and Data Science, Springer, 353-367.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36258-3_31
[8]  Mienye, I.D. and Sun, Y. (2022) A Survey of Ensemble Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Applications, and Prospects. IEEE Access, 10, 99129-99149.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3207287
[9]  Karrar, A.E. (2022) Investigate the Ensemble Model by Intelligence Analysis to Improve the Accuracy of the Classification Data in the Diagnostic and Treatment Interventions for Prostate Cancer. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13, 181-188.
https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130122
[10]  Umair, M., Majeed, F., Shoaib, M., Qaiser Saleem, M., S. Adrees, M., Elsharif Karrar, A., et al. (2022) Main Path Analysis to Filter Unbiased Literature. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 32, 1179-1194.
https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2022.018952
[11]  Shukla, A.K., Pippal, S.K., Gupta, S., Ramachandra Reddy, B. and Tripathi, D. (2020) Knowledge Discovery in Medical and Biological Datasets by Integration of Relief-F and Correlation Feature Selection Techniques. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38, 6637-6648.
https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-179743
[12]  Agrawal, S. and Vagha, S. (2024) A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Care: State-of-the-Art Diagnostic Tools and Future Outlook. Cureus, 16, e66225.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66225
[13]  Shoughi, A., Dowlatshahi, M.B. and Amiri, A. (2025) New Challenges and Opportunities to Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Smart Healthcare. In: Saba, T., Azar, A.T. and Kadry, S., Eds., Explainable AI in Healthcare Imaging for Medical Diagnoses, Elsevier, 503-527.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-23979-3.00020-8
[14]  Adeniran, A.A., Onebunne, A.P. and William, P. (2024) Explainable AI (XAI) in Healthcare: Enhancing Trust and Transparency in Critical Decision-Making. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23, 2447-2658.
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2936
[15]  Lichman, M. (2025) Prognostic Dataset for Prostate Cancer. UCI Machine Learning Repository, University of California.
http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml
[16]  Atmakuru, A. (2025) Enhancing the Performance and Transparency of Machine Learning (ML) Using MRI-Derived Data: Alternative Approaches to ML Interpretability-Explainability. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.
[17]  S Band, S., Yarahmadi, A., Hsu, C., Biyari, M., Sookhak, M., Ameri, R., et al. (2023) Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Medical Health: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Methods. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 40, Article ID: 101286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101286
[18]  Gerlings, J., Jensen, M.S. and Shollo, A. (2021) Explainable AI, but Explainable to Whom? An Exploratory Case Study of Xai in Healthcare. In: Lim, C.P., Chen, Y.W., Vaidya, A., Mahorkar, C. and Jain, L.C., Eds., Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Springer, 169-198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83620-7_7
[19]  Masum, A.K.M., Khan, M.F.I., Hassan, M.M., Bitto, A.K., Farid, D.M. and Rahman, T. (2025) Enhancing Dengue Fever Diagnosis: A Machine Learning Framework with Stacking Ensemble and SHAP Explainability. 2025 International Conference on Quantum Photonics, Artificial Intelligence, and Networking (QPAIN), Rangpur, 31 July-2 August 2025, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1109/qpain66474.2025.11171651
[20]  Radja, H., Djouadi, Y. and Tabia, K. (2025) Model-Agnostic Explainability for Multi-Label Classification via Formal Concept Analysis. Informatica, 49, 307-336.
https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i19.9947
[21]  Salmi, M., Atif, D., Oliva, D., Abraham, A. and Ventura, S. (2024) Handling Imbalanced Medical Datasets: Review of a Decade of Research. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, Article No. 273.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10884-2
[22]  Tuan, D.A. (2024) Bridging the Gap Between Black Box AI and Clinical Practice: Advancing Explainable AI for Trust, Ethics, and Personalized Healthcare Diagnostics.
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1974.v2
[23]  Eltayeb, R.Y., Karrar, A.E., Osman, W.I. and Ali, M.M. (2023) Handling Imbalanced Data through Re-Sampling: Systematic Review. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI), 11, 503-514.
https://doi.org/10.52549/.v11i2.4471
[24]  Naheed, N., Shaheen, M., Ali Khan, S., Alawairdhi, M. and Attique Khan, M. (2020) Importance of Features Selection, Attributes Selection, Challenges and Future Directions for Medical Imaging Data: A Review. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 125, 315-344.
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2020.011380
[25]  Bhati, D., Amiruzzaman, M., Zhao, Y., Guercio, A. and Le, T. (2025) A Survey of Post-Hoc XAI Methods from a Visualization Perspective: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 13, 120785-120806.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3581136

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133