全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Development of Electronic Signature Processes in Türkiye and an Analysis of the Requirements for the Transition to Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC)

DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2026.143002, PP. 17-26

Keywords: Electronic Signature, Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), eIDAS 2.0, Digital Identity, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Public Certification Authority

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article mainly discusses the history of progress regarding the legislation and updates through scrutiny, its current architecture, and its standards applied around the world, such as eIDAS and eIDAS 2.0, which are used not only as technical but also as purely political standards. The penetration of the digital economy has largely promoted the evolution of cyber platforms for public and private use, so that e-signatures have become one of the pillars in the national IT architecture. 1) Legislation The e-signature operations in Türkiye are regulated by Electronic Signature Law No. 5070 and its secondary regulations. However, today, the infrastructure groundwork relies heavily on RSA-based cryptography. RSA is attracting greater and more debate these days, with concerns about whether it will continue to be useful given the increasing importance of security requirements for mobile devices, performance expectations, and the threat posed by quantum computing. This article also examines the extent to which Turkish law is compatible with the EU regulation of compliance. In this paper, we study whether the Turkish legislation complies with the European legislation. This covers security, performance, key size, and support for RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) algorithms. This paper discusses technical, institutional, and legal requirements for the transition of the national e-signature infrastructure to ECC. Furthermore, ECC’s contribution is evaluated in terms of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), and a roadmap is suggested for transitioning to hybrid (ECC + PQC) architectures. Finally, policy and technical suggestions are proposed to facilitate international electronic and mobile signature interoperability under eIDAS 2.0.

References

[1]  Seyirt, M., Özcan, T., Karabulut, B., Doğan, S.M. and Akman Harmancı, E. (2024) Elektronik İmza Standartlarındaki Güncellemeler ve Türkiye’deki Mevcut Durum. Bilgi Yönetimi, 7, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1473545
[2]  Gura, N., Patel, A., Wander, A., Eberle, H. and Shantz, S.C. (2004) Comparing Elliptic Curve Cryptography and RSA on 8-Bit CPUs. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (CHES), Cambridge, 11-13 August 2004, 119-132.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28632-5_9
[3]  Kaya, A. and Türkoğlu, İ. (2023) Simetrik ve Asimetrik Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırılması. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 35, 891-900.
https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.1296228
[4]  Çekiş, İ.K., Toros, A., Apaydın, N. and Özçelik, İ. (2024) Performance Comparison of ECC Libraries for IoT Devices. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A—Applied Sciences and Engineering, 25, 278-288.
https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1427488
[5]  National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) (2021) Transitioning to Post-Quantum Cryptography (NIST SP 1800-36). NIST.
[6]  Çimen, C., Akleylek, S. and Kılıç, E. (2023) Bilgi Güvenliği ve Kriptografi (5. Baskı). Papatya Bilim.
[7]  Electronic Signature Law No. 5070 (2004) Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye, No. 25355.
https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=5070&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5
[8]  Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu (2006) Güvenli Elektronik İmza Oluşturma ve Doğrulama Uygulamaları ile Güvenli Elektronik İmza Formatlarına Dair Usul ve Esaslar.
https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/pages/guvenli-elektronik-imza-formatlarina-dair-usul-ve-esaslar-5a33fef63b234.pdf
[9]  Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu (2020) Elektronik İmza Kanununun Uygulamasına İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar Hakkında Yönetmelik. Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye, No. 31523.
https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=7224&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
[10]  Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu (2005) Elektronik İmza İle İlgili Süreçlere Ve Teknik Kriterlere İlişkin Tebliğ. T.C. Resmi Gazete, Sayı: 25692.
https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=8716&MevzuatTur=9&MevzuatTertip=5
[11]  Mülga Başbakanlık (2006) Kamu Sertifikasyon Hizmetlerine İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar (2006/13). T.C. Resmi Gazete, Sayı: 2614.
https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2004/09/20040906.htm
[12]  European Union (2014) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on Electronic Identification and Trust Services (eIDAS). Official Journal of the European Union, 57, L257.
[13]  European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 Establishing a Framework for a European Digital Identity (eIDAS 2.0). Official Journal of the European Union,1-56.
[14]  ETSI (2021) Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and Security Requirements for Trust Service Providers (ETSI EN 319 401). ETSI.
[15]  ETSI (2024) Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Certificate Profiles Supporting ECDSA, Ed25519, and PQC Signatures (ETSI EN 319 412-5). Sophia Antipolis: ETSI.
[16]  ISO (2020) Information Technology—Security Techniques—Digital Signatures (ISO/IEC 14888). ISO.
[17]  ITU-T (2020) Information Technology—Open Systems Interconnection—The Directory: Public-Key and Attribute Certificate Frameworks (Recommendation X.509). ITU.
[18]  NIST (2022) Recommendation for Key Management: Part 1—General (SP 800-57 Part 1 Rev. 5). NIST.
[19]  TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Public Certification Center (n.d.) Qualified Electronic Certificate Certificate Policy (CP).
https://kamusm.bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr/BilgiDeposu/KSM_NES_SI/KSM_NES_SI.pdf
[20]  Koç, Ç.K. (2009) Cryptographic Engineering. Springer.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133