全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Improving Risk Stratification for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade II: A Prospective Cohort Study on Combined HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA Testing to Predict Histologic Progression

DOI: 10.4236/ojim.2026.161007, PP. 65-75

Keywords: Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade II, Disease Progression, Prospective Studies, Human Papillomavirus DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Stratification

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: The management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II (CIN II) is challenging due to its unpredictable natural history. Although high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA testing is highly sensitive, it lacks specificity in predicting which lesions will progress. Detection of E6/E7 oncogene mRNA reflects viral oncogenic activity. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate and compare the performance of HR-HPV DNA testing, E6/E7 mRNA testing, and their combination in predicting the histologic progression of CIN II lesions, using repeat histopathology as the gold standard. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 150 women with biopsy-confirmed CIN II. Baseline cervical samples were collected for HR-HPV DNA detection (using a validated PCR-based assay) and E6/E7 mRNA detection (using a proprietary nucleic acid amplification test). All participants were followed for 12 months, with the primary endpoint defined as histologic progression to CIN III or worse (CIN III+), confirmed by colposcopic-directed biopsy or conization. The predictive efficacies of the tests, alone and in combination, were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: After 12 months, histologic progression was confirmed in 16 patients (10.7%). The sensitivities for predicting progression were similar for HPV DNA (0.905) and E6/E7 mRNA (0.857) testing. However, E6/E7 mRNA showed higher specificity (0.792) than HPV DNA (0.701) (AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.827). The combined testing strategy (defined as positivity for both assays) demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving a specificity of 0.917 while maintaining a sensitivity of 0.857. The area under the ROC curve for the combined model was 0.912 (95% CI: 0.854 - 0.952), which was significantly superior to that of HPV DNA testing alone (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For women with biopsy-confirmed CIN II, a combined testing strategy for HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA significantly improves the prediction of histologic progression by markedly increasing specificity. This approach offers a powerful tool for precise risk stratification, potentially reducing overtreatment while ensuring timely intervention for high-risk individuals.

References

[1]  Zhou, Y., Shi, X., Liu, J. and Zhang, L. (2023) Correlation between Human Papillomavirus Viral Load and Cervical Lesions Classification: A Review of Current Research. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, Article 1111269.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1111269
[2]  Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
[3]  Perkins, R.B., Guido, R.S., Castle, P.E., Chelmow, D., Einstein, M.H., Garcia, F., et al. (2020) 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 24, 102-131.
https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000525
[4]  Kylebäck, K., Ekeryd-Andalen, A., Greppe, C., Björkenfeldt Havel, C., Zhang, C. and Strander, B. (2022) Active Expectancy as Alternative to Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 in Women Aged 25 to 30 Years: ExCIN2—A Prospective Clinical Multicenter Cohort Study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 227, 742.e1-742.e11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.051
[5]  Stuebs, F.A., Koch, M.C., Dietl, A.K., Adler, W., Geppert, C., Hartmann, A., et al. (2022) Cytology and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test for Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment. Diagnostics, 12, Article 1748.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071748
[6]  Dempster-Rivett, K., Innes, C.R., Simcock, B.J., Harker, D., Williman, J.A., Van Der Griend, R.A., et al. (2020) Evaluation of Guidelines for Observational Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 in Young Women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223, 408.e1-408.e11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.029
[7]  Liang, L.A., Einzmann, T., Franzen, A., Schwarzer, K., Schauberger, G., Schriefer, D., et al. (2021) Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-Alone or Cotesting Strategies. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 30, 474-484.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1003
[8]  Giorgi Rossi, P., Baldacchini, F. and Ronco, G. (2014) The Possible Effects on Socio-Economic Inequalities of Introducing HPV Testing as Primary Test in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs. Frontiers in Oncology, 4, Article 20.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00020
[9]  Moody, C.A. and Laimins, L.A. (2010) Human Papillomavirus Oncoproteins: Pathways to Transformation. Nature Reviews Cancer, 10, 550-560.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2886
[10]  Giorgi Rossi, P., Ronco, G., Mancuso, P., Carozzi, F., Allia, E., Bisanzi, S., et al. (2022) Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA Assay as Primary Screening Test: Results from the NTCC2 Trial. International Journal of Cancer, 151, 1047-1058.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34120
[11]  Song, Y., Zhang, M., Zhang, C., Du, S. and Zhai, F. (2024) Logistic Regression Analysis of mRNA Expression Changes and Prognosis after Cervical Surgery. AIP Advances, 14, Article ID: 025233.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0177033
[12]  Gupta, S.M., Warke, H., Chaudhari, H., Mavani, P., Katke, R.D., Kerkar, S.C., et al. (2022) Human Papillomavirus E6/E7 Oncogene Transcripts as Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Cervical Cancer. Journal of Medical Virology, 94, 3368-3375.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27700
[13]  Zhao, F., Lin, M.J., Chen, F., Hu, S., Zhang, R., Belinson, J.L., et al. (2010) Performance of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing as a Primary Screen for Cervical Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from 17 Population-Based Studies from China. The Lancet Oncology, 11, 1160-1171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70256-4
[14]  Hu, Z., Zhu, D., Wang, W., Li, W., Jia, W., Zeng, X., et al. (2015) Genome-wide Profiling of HPV Integration in Cervical Cancer Identifies Clustered Genomic Hot Spots and a Potential Microhomology-Mediated Integration Mechanism. Nature Genetics, 47, 158-163.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3178
[15]  Kyrgiou, M., Kalliala, I., Mitra, A., Fotopoulou, C., Ghaem-Maghami, S., Martin-Hirsch, P.P., et al. (2017) Immediate Referral to Colposcopy versus Cytological Surveillance for Minor Cervical Cytological Abnormalities in the Absence of HPV Test. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 1, CD009836.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009836.pub2
[16]  Fan, Y. and Shen, Z. (2018) The Clinical Value of HPV E6/E7 and STAT3 mRNA Detection in Cervical Cancer Screening. Pathology—Research and Practice, 214, 767-775.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2018.02.003
[17]  Zappacosta, R., Sablone, F., Pansa, L., Buca, D., Buca, D. and Rosini, S. (2017) Analytic and Diagnostic Performances of Human Papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA Test on Up-To 11-Year-Old Liquid-Based Cervical Samples. A Biobank-Based Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18, Article 1480.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071480

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133