全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Planting Density and Seasonal Variability Effects on Yield of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) as a Novel Crop in Tennessee

DOI: 10.4236/as.2026.172008, PP. 110-118

Keywords: Environmental Stress, Planting Density, Southeastern USA, Yield Potential

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) is a short-season, Asian pulse grain legume potentially suited to USA agricultural crop rotations that could be of interest to Southeastern farmers. This legume boasts high seed nutritional value and drought tolerance. The climate of the East Asian region of origin of mung bean closely parallels the Southeast region of the United States, making it a candidate for testing as a novel crop. The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall performance and adaptability of available varieties of mung bean to the environmental conditions of West Tennessee. For this, we conducted a three-year study with varieties Berken and OK2000 planted in typical delta soils from 2022 to 2024. Different planting densities and dates were used as variables in the planting of the bean varieties. Planting was at three seeding rates: 150,000, 200,000, and 250,000 seeds per 0.4 ha (1 acre), with 19 cm row width (7.5 inches) in randomized complete block design with 6 repetitions. Trait measurements included plot weight, seed moisture content, and total yield. Results varied between the three years: yield was low in the August 2022 planting but higher in the July 2023 and June 2024 plantings, with mean yields averaging over 1,600 kg ha-1 across varieties and densities for those two years. Herbicides were very effective for weed control in the latter two seasons. These findings provide a basis for understanding the potential of mung beans in the agronomic settings and environmental conditions of the Mid South region of the United States.

References

[1]  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) The Third Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments.
[2]  Shah, Z., Shah, S.H., Peoples, M.B., Schwenke, G.D. and Herridge, D.F. (2003) Crop Residue and Fertiliser N Effects on Nitrogen Fixation and Yields of Legume-Cereal Rotations and Soil Organic Fertility. Field Crops Research, 83, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(03)00005-4
[3]  Stagnari, F., Maggio, A., Galieni, A. and Pisante, M. (2017) Multiple Benefits of Legumes for Agriculture Sustainability: An Overview. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 4, Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0085-1
[4]  Tanveer, A., Ikram, R.M. and Ali, H.H. (2019) Crop Rotation: Principles and Practices. In: Agronomic Crops, Springer, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9783-8_1
[5]  Martinelli, F., Vollheyde, A., Cebrián-Piqueras, M.A., von Haaren, C., Lorenzetti, E., Barberi, P., et al. (2022) LEGU-MED: Developing Biodiversity-Based Agriculture with Legume Cropping Systems in the Mediterranean Basin. Agronomy, 12, Article 132.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010132
[6]  Angus, J.F., Kirkegaard, J.A., Hunt, J.R., Ryan, M.H., Ohlander, L. and Peoples, M.B. (2015) Break Crops and Rotations for Wheat. Crop & Pasture Science, 66, 523-552.
https://doi.org/10.1071/cp14252
[7]  Huppertz, M., Manasa S, L., Kachhap, D., Dalai, A., Yadav, N., Baby, D., et al. (2023) Exploring the Potential of Mung Bean: From Domestication and Traditional Selection to Modern Genetic and Genomic Technologies in a Changing World. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 14, Article 100786.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100786
[8]  Heichel, G.H. (1987) Legume Nitrogen: Symbiotic Fixation and Recovery by Subsequent Crops. In: Helsel, Z.R., Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control, Elsevier, 63-80.
[9]  Lambrides, C.J. and Godwin, I.D. (2007) Mung Bean. In: Kole, C., ed., Pulses, Sugar and Tuber Crops. Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, Vol. 3, 69-90.
[10]  Ahmed, M.T., Pramanik, K.S., Islam, R.M., and Sikder, S. (2021) Amelioration of Adverse Effect of Drought Stress on Mung Bean through Supplemental Agronomic Practices. The Agriculturists, 19, 73-85.
[11]  Batzer, J.C., Singh, A., Rairdin, A., Chiteri, K. and Mueller, D.S. (2022) Mungbean: A Preview of Disease Management Challenges for an Alternative U.S. Cash Crop. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 13, Article 12.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmab044
[12]  Endres, G. and Ostlie, M. (2021) Pinto Bean Response to Row Spacing and Plant Population. North Dakota State University Extension.
https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/sites/default/files/2022-06/21%20Pinto%20Bean%20Response%20to%20Row%20Spacing-Population.pdf
[13]  Bhardwaj, H.L. and Hamama, A.A. (2015) Cultivar, Planting Date, and Row Spacing Effects on Mungbean. Hort Science, 50, 1309-1311.
https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.50.9.1309
[14]  Rachaputi, R.C.N., Chauhan, Y., Douglas, C., Martin, W., Krosch, S., Agius, P., et al. (2015) Physiological Basis of Yield Variation in Response to Row Spacing and Plant Density of Mungbean Grown in Subtropical Environments. Field Crops Research, 183, 14-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.013
[15]  Christian, J., Hui, D., Kaur, N., Kieffer, C., Moghaddam, S., Touray, A., et al. (2023) Effects of Variety and Planting Density on Mung Bean Eco-Physiology and Yield in the Southeastern US. Agricultural Sciences, 14, 898-914.
https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.147060
[16]  Devasirvatham, V., Gaur, P.M., Mallikarjuna, N., Raju, T.N., Trethowan, R.M. and Tan, D.K.Y. (2013) Reproductive Biology of Chickpea Response to Heat Stress in the Field Is Associated with the Performance in Controlled Environments. Field Crops Research, 142, 9-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.011
[17]  Van Haeften, S., Dudley, C., Kang, Y., Smith, D., Nair, R.M., Douglas, C.A., et al. (2023) Building a Better Mungbean: Breeding for Reproductive Resilience in a Changing Climate. Food and Energy Security, 12, e467.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.467
[18]  Azeem, M. (2018) Weed Control in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) through Parthenium Water Extract in Combination with a Herbicide. International Journal of Biosciences, 12, 36-48.
[19]  Siddique, K.H., Brinsmead, H.F., Rachaputi, R.C. N., Bhattarai, S. S., and Harris, D. (2012) Innovations in Agronomy for Food Legumes: A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 45-64.
[20]  Ong, P.W., Lin, Y.P., Chen, H.W., Lo, C.Y., Burlyaeva, M., et al. (2023) Environment as a Limiting Factor of the Historical Global Spread of Mungbean. eLife, 12, e85725.
[21]  Kakani, V.G., Prasad, P.V.V., Craufurd, P.Q. and Wheeler, T.R. (2002) Response of in Vitro Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes to Temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25, 1651-1661.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00943.x
[22]  Zoong Lwe, Z.S., Welti, R., Anco, D., Naveed, S., Rustgi, S. and Narayanan, S. (2020) Heat Stress Elicits Remodeling in the Anther Lipidome of Peanut. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 22163.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78695-3
[23]  Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Kaur, T. and Mahajan, G. (2025) Weed Control in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) with Residue Mulch, Pre-and Post-Emergence Herbicides. Crop Protection, 197, Article 107291.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107291

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133