This study aimed to survey and evaluate the subjective noise annoyance levels in Nairobi City. Being the capital city of Kenya in East Africa, Nairobi is undergoing rapid growth, like many developing cities globally. Road traffic levels are witnessing a phenomenal increase, accompanied by a corresponding change in the ambient soundscape across the city. Previous research has shown that Road Traffic Noise (RTN) is the most prevalent pollutant that disturbs the quality of life in urban environments, hence the justification of the present research. The research team deployed customized questionnaires, which were distributed among samples across 42 locations. The questionnaires had two scales, the 0 - 10 Richter Scale and a 5-point verbal qualifying scale. A total of 384 participants were sampled from the main population frame, and each location had at least 9 survey questionnaires for each set. The Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, University of Nairobi, coordinated data collection across the city between 6th July 2025 and 12th July 2025. The data clerks conducted a purposive sampling for a face-to-face interview using the two scales. The two scales were combined, and on analysis, the level of highly annoyed (HA) individuals ranged between 10% and 100%. Further using OriginPro 2025b Software and MS Excel, different exposure-response relationships were developed to show how the equivalent sound pressure level varied with the number of highly annoyed individuals. It was found that, as the equivalent sound pressure level increased, so did the number of highly annoyed individuals. The low coefficient of determination (R2) values obtained compared well with those of other similar previous studies, which indicates that Nairobi has a high RTN environment. Further, the residents have adapted to chronic RTN exposure, which has lowered their perceptual sense of elevated sound pressure levels on the reported annoyance. Therefore, this study does provide a baseline for city authorities to develop and implement RTN’s abatement measures and policies aimed at making neighborhoods quieter. In addition, the new policy may transcend sustainable traffic flow management.
References
[1]
UN-Habitat (2022) World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
[2]
European Environment Agency (2017) Environmental noise in Europe 2017. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d5996ac7-5239-11f0-a9d0-01aa75ed71a1/
[3]
European Environment Agency (2021) Noise in Europe 2021. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/human/noise/noise-fact-sheets
[4]
Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S., et al. (2014) Auditory and Non-Auditory Effects of Noise on Health. The Lancet, 383, 1325-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61613-x
[5]
Fields, J.M., De Jong, R.G., Gjestland, T., Flindell, I.H., Job, R.F.S., Kurra, S., et al. (2001) Standardized General-Purpose Noise Reaction Questions for Community Noise Surveys: Research and a Recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 242, 641-679. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3384
[6]
World Health Organization (2018) Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/279952/9789289053563-eng.pdf
[7]
Schultz, T.J. (1978) Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382013
[8]
Babisch, W. (2002) The Noise/Stress Concept, Risk Assessment and Research Needs. Noise & Health, 4, 1-11.
[9]
Brink, M., Wirth, K.E., Schierz, C., Thomann, G. and Bauer, G. (2008) Annoyance Responses to Stable and Changing Aircraft Noise Exposure. TheJournaloftheAcousticalSocietyofAmerica, 124, 2930-2941. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2977680
[10]
Guski, R., Schreckenberg, D. and Schuemer, R. (2017) WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, Article 1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121539
[11]
Ascigil-Dincer, M. and Yilmaz Demirkale, S. (2021) Model Development for Traffic Noise Annoyance Prediction. Applied Acoustics, 177, Article 107909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107909
[12]
Chauhan, B.S., Garg, N. and Tiwari, S. (2024) Predictive Noise Annoyance and Noise-Induced Health Effects Models for Road Traffic Noise in NCT of Delhi, India. Noise Mapping, 11, Article 20240008. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2024-0008
[13]
Clark, S.N., Alli, A.S., Ezzati, M., Brauer, M., Toledano, M.B., Nimo, J., et al. (2022) Spatial Modelling and Inequalities of Environmental Noise in Accra, Ghana. Environmental Research, 214, Article 113932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113932
[14]
Ali, S.A. and Tamura, A. (2003) Road Traffic Noise Levels, Restrictions and Annoyance in Greater Cairo, Egypt. AppliedAcoustics, 64, 815-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-682x(03)00031-8
[15]
Nyaranga, C., Nyamari, J., Akunga, D. and Amulla, W. (2021) Levels of Environmental Noise and Perceived Health Implications in Bus Termini in Nairobi City County, Kenya. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 6, 16-22.
[16]
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) (2019) 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census Reports. Government of Kenya. https://www.knbs.or.ke/2019-kenya-population-and-housing-census-reports/
[17]
Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. EducationalandPsychologicalMeasurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
[18]
Miedema, H.M.E. and Vos, H. (1998) Exposure-Response Relationships for Transportation Noise. TheJournaloftheAcousticalSocietyofAmerica, 104, 3432-3445. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423927
[19]
Hammersen, F., Niemann, H. and Hoebel, J. (2016) Environmental Noise Annoyance and Mental Health in Adults: Findings from the Cross-Sectional German Health Update (GEDA) Study 2012. InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalResearchandPublicHealth, 13, Article 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100954
[20]
Öhrström, E., Hadzibajramovic, E., Holmes, M. and Svensson, H. (2006) Effects of Road Traffic Noise on Sleep: Studies on Children and Adults. JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology, 26, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.06.004