全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

NIO Auto Audit Case: Research on Financial Compliance and Audit Risks in an Innovative Business Model

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2026.142017, PP. 262-276

Keywords: Audit, BaaS, NIO, Risk

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

With the rapid development of the new energy vehicle industry and the innovation of business models, the auditing of Internet car-making enterprises is facing unprecedented challenges. This paper takes NIO as the research object, focusing on the auditing disputes caused by its unique BaaS (Battery as a Service) business model. It combines two core cases, the short-selling event by Muddy Waters in 2022 and the securities fraud lawsuit by GIC in 2025, to analyze from the dimensions of audit risk identification, application of accounting standards, and execution of audit procedures. The cases involve key auditing issues such as the compliance of revenue recognition, the determination of related party control, and the auditing of off-balance sheet business. By deconstructing the transaction structure between NIO and its related party Wuhan Weiran, the paper explores the application boundaries of auditing standards and the optimization paths of auditing practices under innovative business models. The research finds that the auditing risks of Internet car-making enterprises are mainly concentrated in the rationality of revenue recognition methods, the substantive determination of related party relationships, and the financial information disclosure under heavy asset operations. Auditing institutions need to enhance the quality of auditing by strengthening the judgment of standard applicability, deepening the penetration verification of related parties, and introducing information-based auditing technologies. The conclusions of this paper can provide references for the auditing practice in the new energy vehicle industry and offer lessons for the financial compliance construction of innovative enterprises.

References

[1]  Adiyana, N. F., & Juniarti, B. D. (2025). The Impact of Task Complexity and Auditor Experience on Audit Judgment Using Auditor Ethics as a Moderating Factor. Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 1, 143-152.
https://doi.org/10.65440/mp14px36
[2]  Baldauf, J., Steller, M., & Steckel, R. (2015). The Influence of Audit Risk and Materiality Guidelines on Auditors’ Planning Materiality Assessment. Accounting and Finance Research, 4, 97-114.
https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v4n4p97
[3]  Beattie, V., Brandt, R., & Fernley, S. (2005). Auditor Independence and Audit Risk: A Reconceptualization. Journal of International Accounting Research, 4, 39-71.
https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2005.4.1.39
[4]  Blay, A. D., Sneathen, L. D., & Kizirian, T. (2007). The Effects of Fraud and Going‐Concern Risk on Auditors’ Assessments of the Risk of Material Misstatement and Resulting Audit Procedures. International Journal of Auditing, 11, 149-163.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00362.x
[5]  Fortvingler, J., & Szívós, L. (2016). Different Approaches to Fraud Risk Assessment and Their Implications on Audit Planning. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 24, 102-112.
https://doi.org/10.3311/ppso.8436
[6]  Mubako, G., & O’Donnell, E. (2018). Effect of Fraud Risk Assessments on Auditor Skepticism: Unintended Consequences on Evidence Evaluation. International Journal of Auditing, 22, 55-64.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12104
[7]  Wang, I. Z., & Fargher, N. (2017). The Effects of Tone at the Top and Coordination with External Auditors on Internal Auditors’ Fraud Risk Assessments. Accounting & Finance, 57, 1177-1202.
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12191

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133