|
|
蒙东地区乡村多功能类型划分及其评价
|
Abstract:
本文以蒙东地区39个县域为研究单元,通过构建乡村地域多功能评价指标体系,利用熵权法和ArcGIS自然间断点法揭示农业生产、非农业生产、生活保障和生态保育四个功能的空间分异特征,进而识别出蒙东地区分县域的地域主导功能类型,分别总结其乡村发展策略。结果表明:(1) 蒙东地区乡村地域功能的空间分布存在显著的分异特征。农业生产功能高值区主要分布在地形平坦、水草丰茂、土质肥沃的蒙东地区西北部;非农业生产功能高值区主要集中在二、三产业发展较好、劳动力充足、交通通达性高的县域;生活保障功能高值区主要集中在基础设施建设良好、交通条件相对发达、教育医疗等资源分布较为集中的县域;生态保育功能高值区主要集中在森林覆盖率高、生态环境重要性十分突出的大兴安岭东麓。(2) 蒙东地区乡村地域多功能的综合发展水平呈现出西南部和东北部较低,西部和中部较高的空间分异特征。总体呈现中等水平,乡村发展活力不足。(3) 依据各县域的优势功能数量,进一步将蒙东地区划分成5种乡村地域主导功能类型,分别为农业生产主导型、生活保障主导型、生态保育主导型、均衡发展型和综合发展型。基于不同的功能主导类型,提出适宜不同区域的发展建议。
In this paper, 39 counties in eastern Inner Mongolia are taken as the research unit. By constructing the rural regional multifunctional evaluation index system, entropy weight method and ArcGIS natural break point method reveal the spatial differentiation characteristics of four functions of agricultural production, non-agricultural production, livelihood security and ecological conservation, and then identify the regional dominant function types of counties in eastern Inner Mongolia. Summarize its rural development strategy respectively. The results show that: (1) the spatial distribution of rural regional functions in eastern Inner Mongolia has significant differentiation characteristics. The high-value areas of agricultural production function are mainly distributed in the northwest of eastern Inner Mongolia where the terrain is flat, the water and grass are abundant and the soil is fertile. The high-value areas of non-agricultural production function are mainly distributed in the counties with better development of secondary and tertiary industries, sufficient labor force and high traffic accessibility. The areas with high living security function are mainly concentrated in counties with good infrastructure construction, relatively developed transportation conditions, and concentrated distribution of education and medical resources. The areas with high ecological conservation function are mainly concentrated in the eastern foot of Greater Khingan Mountains with high forest coverage rate and outstanding ecological environment importance. (2) The comprehensive development level of rural regional multifunction in eastern Inner Mongolia is lower in the southwest and northeast, and higher in the west and central. The overall level is medium, and the vitality of rural development is insufficient. (3) According to the number of advantageous functions in each county, eastern Inner Mongolia is further divided into five rural regional dominant function types, namely,
| [1] | 张小林. 乡村概念辨析[J]. 地理学报, 1998(4): 365-371. |
| [2] | 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越“现代化”发展范式[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270. |
| [3] | 刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. |
| [4] | 李智, 范琳芸, 张小林. 基于村域的乡村多功能类型划分及评价研究——以江苏省金坛市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(3): 359-367. |
| [5] | 陶陶, 罗其友. 农业的多功能性与农业功能分区[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2004(1): 46-50. |
| [6] | 陈秋珍, Sumelius, J. 国内外农业多功能性研究文献综述[J]. 中国农村观察, 2007(3): 71-79+81. |
| [7] | 方志权. 日本发展多功能性农业的启示与思考[J]. 上海农村经济, 2016(5): 39-42. |
| [8] | 曹俊杰. 韩国农业多功能性建设的经验及其借鉴意义[J]. 学术研究, 2009(3): 77-81. |
| [9] | Wilson, G.A. (2009) The Spatiality of Multifunctional Agriculture: A Human Geography Perspective. Geoforum, 40, 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.007 |
| [10] | 刘自强, 周爱兰, 鲁奇. 乡村地域主导功能的转型与乡村发展阶段的划分[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(4): 49-54. |
| [11] | Marsden, T. (2010) Rural Futures: The Consumption Countryside and Its Regulation. Sociologia Ruralis, 39, 501-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00121 |
| [12] | Wilson, G.A. (2001) From Productivism to Post-Productivism… and Back Again? Exploring the (un)Changed Natural and Mental Landscapes of European Agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00007 |
| [13] | Holmes, J. (2006) Impulses Towards a Multifunctional Transition in Rural Australia: Gaps in the Research Agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 142-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006 |
| [14] | Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M.E.F. and Verburg, P.H. (2010) Space for People, Plants, and Livestock? Quantifying Interactions among Multiple Landscape Functions in a Dutch Rural Region RID A-8469-2010. Ecological Indicators, 10, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015 |
| [15] | 刘玉, 刘彦随. 乡村地域多功能的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(10): 164-169. |
| [16] | 李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(6): 797-807. |
| [17] | 李平星, 陈诚, 陈江龙. 乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7): 845-851. |
| [18] | 徐凯, 房艳刚. 辽宁省乡村多功能评价和演变特征分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(1): 147-157. |
| [19] | 内蒙古自治区统计局. 内蒙古统计年鉴2022[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022. |
| [20] | 熊鹰, 黄利华, 邹芳, 赵丹丹, 唐艳丽. 基于县域尺度乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型划分——以湖南省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(6): 162-170. |
| [21] | 徐凯, 房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别——以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 482-495. |
| [22] | Ordway, E.M., Naylor, R.L., Nkongho, R.N. and Lambin, E.F. (2021) Author Correction: Oil Palm Expansion and Deforestation in Southwest Cameroon Associated with Proliferation of Informal Mills. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 2270. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22418-3 |
| [23] | 王富喜, 毛爱华, 李赫龙, 贾明璐. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329. |
| [24] | 陈瑞媛, 廖和平, 刘愿理, 何田, 朱琳, 杨胜强. 滇西县域乡村地域多功能分类与乡村振兴路径研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(6): 1-9. |
| [25] | Hoefle, S.W. (2016) Multi-Functionality, Juxtaposition and Conflict in the Central Amazon: Will Tourism Contribute to Rural Livelihoods and Save the Rainforest? Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.009 |
| [26] | Holmes, J. (2010) The Multifunctional Transition in Australia’s Tropical Savannas: The Emergence of Consumption, Protection and Indigenous Values. Geographical Research, 48, 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00629.x |
| [27] | 龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 426-434. |
| [28] | 毛田颖, 马晓冬. 乡村地域多功能性评价及其类型划分——基于徐州镇域的实证研究[J]. 小城镇建设, 2019, 37(11): 82-88. |