The magnetic monopole—an isolated magnetic charge—has long been proposed to restore the symmetry of Maxwell’s equations, yet it has never been observed as a free particle. This paper presents a new theoretical model describing the magnetic monopole as a tri-vortex excitation of a superfluid vacuum. Building on the Quark Vortex Theory and the Mushroom Model of the nucleon, the proton and neutron are shown to represent confined monopoles of opposite magnetic polarity, formed by three coupled vortices: two centrifugal and one centripetal. The same geometry, when unconfined, produces an open magnetic flux corresponding to a free monopole. Within this hydrodynamic framework, magnetic permeability μ0 is reinterpreted as the shear response of the vacuum, and magnetic charge arises from a circulation imbalance quantified by
, linking magnetism directly to vacuum density ρ and vortex dynamics. The pressure gradient between interacting vortices yields the inverse-square magnetic force, identical in form to gravitation, which is shown to originate from large-scale vortex structures in the same medium. Energy analysis demonstrates that monopole self-energies range from sub-MeV for nucleon-sized cores to eV for causality-limited vortices, eliminating singularities inherent in point-charge models. The tri-vortex monopole satisfies all theoretical requirements for magnetic charge—quantized flux, finite energy, topological stability, and dynamic equilibrium—while unifying magnetic, electric, gravitational, and nuclear forces under a single physical principle: the self-organized rotation and pressure balance of the superfluid vacuum.
References
[1]
Dirac, P.A.M. (1931) Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 133, 60-72.
[2]
Butto, N. (2023) A New Theory to Understand the Mechanism of Gravitation. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 9, 1-19.
[3]
Butto, N. (2025) Omniom Vacuum Framework: Unifying Vacuum States from Pre-Big Bang to Dark Energy. JournalofHighEnergyPhysics, GravitationandCosmology, 11, 612-638. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2025.112044
[4]
Butto, N. (2025) Unravelling the Proton Mass Puzzle: A Novel Approach through Quark Vortex Dynamics and the Mushroom Model. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 11, 951-972.
[5]
Butto, N. (2020) Electron Shape and Structure: A New Vortex Theory. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 6, 340-352. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2020.63027
[6]
Butto, N. (2024) A New Theory Exploring the Internal Structure of Quarks. JournalofHighEnergyPhysics, GravitationandCosmology, 10, 1713-1733. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2024.104097
[7]
Rayfield, G.W. and Reif, F. (1964) Quantized Vortex Rings in Superfluid Helium. PhysicalReview, 136, A1194-A1208. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.136.a1194
[8]
Preskill, J. (1984) Magnetic Monopoles. AnnualReviewofNuclearandParticleScience, 34, 461-530. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.34.120184.002333
[9]
Butto, N. (2020) New Mechanism and Analytical Formula for Understanding the Gravity Constant G. JournalofHighEnergyPhysics, GravitationandCosmology, 6, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2020.63029
[10]
Butto, N. (2020) The Essence and Origin of the Magnetic Constant. JournalofHighEnergyPhysics, GravitationandCosmology, 06, 662-669. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2020.64045
[11]
Butto, N. (2021) Revealing the Essence of Electric Permittivity Constant. JournalofHighEnergyPhysics, GravitationandCosmology, 7, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2021.71011