全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Design Science Study of Blockchain-Based Governance and Incentive Architectures for Ride-Sharing Platforms

DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2026.161019, PP. 300-319

Keywords: Decentralised Ride-Sharing, DAO Governance, Tokenomics, Blockchain Mobility, Equitable Transportation, Smart Contracts

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Ride-sharing platforms have transformed urban mobility but continue to face persistent challenges related to high commission structures, algorithmic opacity, regulatory fragmentation, and limited stakeholder participation. Adopting a Design Science Research approach, this study proposes and evaluates a blockchain-based ride-sharing framework that integrates Decentralised Autonomous Organisation (DAO) governance and token-based incentive mechanisms to address these structural limitations. A proof-of-concept artefact was developed using a Parity Substrate blockchain with a Proof-of-Authority (PoA) consensus model, incorporating modular components for ride management, decentralised governance, cooperative finance, identity verification, and incentive distribution. The artefact was evaluated through simulated performance testing involving 2000 transactions and qualitative validation via focus group discussions with drivers, transport union representatives, and regulators in Nairobi. Results indicate sustained throughput of approximately 140 transactions per second with low transaction costs, alongside improved stakeholder perceptions of transparency, fairness, and participatory governance compared to conventional ride-hailing platforms. While the findings are exploratory, they suggest that permissioned blockchain architectures combined with cooperative governance and intrinsically utilitarian token models may offer a viable pathway for reconfiguring ride-sharing platforms toward more inclusive, accountable, and context-sensitive mobility systems, particularly in emerging-market environments.

References

[1]  CFI Team (2021) Sharing Economy.
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/sharing-economy/
[2]  Mouratidis, K., Peters, S. and van Wee, B. (2021) Transportation Technologies, Sharing Economy, and Teleactivities: Implications for Built Environment and Travel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, Article ID: 102716.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102716
[3]  Durand-Lasserve, O. and Pierru, A. (2021) Modeling World Oil Market Questions: An Economic Perspective. Energy Policy, 159, Article ID: 112606.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112606
[4]  Zimmer, J. (2020) John Zimmer s Disruption of the Taxi Industry: A Case Study. FasterCapital.
https://fastercapital.com/articles/John-Zimmer-s-Disruption-of-the-Taxi-Industry--A-Case-Study.html
[5]  Howcroft, D. and Leaver, A. (2024) Unstable Platforms: Uber’s Business Model and the Challenge of Organisational Legitimacy. Accounting Forum, 49, 369-394.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2024.2309018
[6]  Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) (2025) The Need for Transparency in AI and Algorithmic Rideshare Platform Decisions. Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT).
https://cdt.org/insights/the-need-for-transparency-in-ai-and-algorithmic-rideshare-platform-decisions/
[7]  Federal Trade Commission (2025) FTC Takes Action against Uber for Deceptive Billing and Cancellation Practices. Federal Trade Commission.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/04/ftc-takes-action-against-uber-deceptive-billing-cancellation-practices
[8]  Lyft (2024) Lyft Economic Impact Report.
https://s27.q4cdn.com/263799617/files/doc_downloads/2024/Lyft-Economic-Impact-Report-2024.pdf
[9]  Sharecafe (2025) FTC Investigates Uber and Lyft for Potential Collusion in New York City.
https://www.sharecafe.com.au/2025/02/01/ftc-investigates-uber-and-lyft-for-potential-collusion-in-new-york-city/
[10]  Sun, N., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y. and Liu, Y. (2024) Decoupling Online Ride-Hailing Services: A Privacy Protection Scheme Based on Decentralized Identity. Electronics, 13, Article No. 4060.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13204060
[11]  Tapscott, D. (2020) Foreword: Toward a New Social Contract for the Digital Economy. MIT Press.
[12]  Lage, O., Saiz-Santos, M. and Zarzuelo, J.M. (2022) Decentralized Platform Economy: Emerging Blockchain-Based Decentralized Platform Business Models. Electronic Markets, 32, 1707-1723.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00586-4
[13]  Shivers, R., Rahman, M.A., Faruk, M.J.H., Shahriar, H., Cuzzocrea, A. and Clincy, V. (2021) Ride-Hailing for Autonomous Vehicles: Hyperledger Fabric-Based Secure and Decentralize Blockchain Platform. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Orlando, 15-18 December 2021, 5450-5459.
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671379
[14]  Anglen, J. (2024) Comprehensive Guide to DAO Tokenomics: Key Strategies and Best Practices for Effective Incentive Structures. Rapid Innovation.
https://www.rapidinnovation.io/post/comprehensive-guide-dao-tokenomics-key-strategies-best-practices-effective-incentive-structures
[15]  Drife Blog (2023) Everything You Need to Know about DRF. Drife Blog.
https://blog.drife.io/everything-you-need-to-know-about-drf-d629337533b4
[16]  Micheal, L. (2022) Tokenomics and Incentive Mechanisms: Driving User Engagement and Liquidity in DeFi Platforms.
[17]  Kivilo, S., Norta, A. and Hattingh, M. (2025) A Tokenomics Conceptual Goal Model. In: Prieto, J., et al., Eds., Blockchain and Applications, 6th International Congress, Springer, 3-12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81928-5_1
[18]  Yuliantina, D., Fatmawati, Y. and Jariah, A. (2025) Gig Economy Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 4, 6178.
[19]  Giggle Finance (2025) How Much Do Lyft Drivers Make? Understanding Pay & Earnings. Giggle Finance.
https://gigglefinance.com/how-much-do-lyft-drivers-make-understanding-pay-earnings/
[20]  Sustainability Directory (2025) Could Blockchain Mitigate Gig Economy Issues? Sustainability Directory.
https://sustainability-directory.com/question/could-blockchain-mitigate-gig-economy-issues/
[21]  Cabello, C. and Mikalef, P. (2025) Exploring Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Governance: An Integrative Literature Review. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
[22]  Princeton University (2024) DeCenter.
https://decenter.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/DeCenter-Paper-2024-Q3-Spread.pdf
[23]  Scott, A. (2015) Disruption Ahead: La’Zooz on Road Mining and “Replacing Your Car with Your Smartphone”. Cointelegraph.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/disruption-ahead-lazooz-on-road-mining-and-replacing-your-car-with-your-smartphone
[24]  Zluf, S. (2020) La’Zooz: Real-Time Social Ridesharing App. Indiegogo.
https://www.indiegogo.com/en/projects/shayzluf/la-zooz-real-time-social-ridesharing-app#/section/rewards/reward-product-2288913
[25]  Mahmoud, N., Aly, A. and Abdelkader, H. (2022) Enhancing Blockchain-Based Ride-Sharing Services Using IPFS. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 16, Article ID: 200135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200135
[26]  Makhdomi, A.A. and Gillani, I.A. (2025) Decentralized Ridesharing: Overcoming Scalability Issues with Layer 2 Solution. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, Hyderabad, 4-7 January 2025, 319-324.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3700838.3703682

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133