全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

7.5%茶·黄液可溶液剂对水稻稻瘟病病菌抑制作用生测实验
A Bioassay Experiment on the Inhibitory Effect of 7.5% Tea- Yellow Liquid Soluble Agent on Rice Blast Fungus

DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2026.161017, PP. 117-124

Keywords: 稻瘟病,植物源杀菌剂,茶·黄液,菌丝生长率,绿色防控
Rice Blast Disease
, Plant-Derived Fungicide, Tea-Flavonoid Aqueous Solution, Mycelial Growth Rate, Green Control

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

【目的】稻瘟病是全球水稻生产的主要威胁之一,长期依赖化学农药易引发抗药性问题。【方法】本研究以自主研发的7.5%茶·黄液水剂(植物源杀菌剂)为对象,通过菌丝生长速率法测定其对水稻稻瘟病病菌的抑制作用。实验设置5个浓度梯度(46.9~750 μg/ml),测定24、48、72小时及5天(120小时)的菌落抑制率,并通过毒力回归分析计算有效抑制中浓度(EC50)。【结果】750 μg/ml浓度下,24小时抑制率达97.8%,5天时仍维持96.6%的高抑制率;EC50值为48.19 μg/ml (稀释约1500倍),表明其具有强效抑菌能力。药效随浓度降低呈递减趋势,但高浓度处理下持效性显著。【意义】该植物源杀菌剂通过抑制病原菌生长及增强植物抗性,为稻瘟病绿色防控提供了新选择,兼具生态安全与抗药性管理优势。
[Purposes] Rice blast disease is one of the major threats to global rice production, and prolonged reliance on chemical fungicides can lead to increased antifungal resistance and environmental concerns. [Methods] This study focused on the 7.5% tea-yellow liquid solution agent (a plant-based fungicide), against M. oryzae using the mycelial growth rate method. Five concentration gradients (46.9~750 μg/mL) were tested, and colony inhibition rates were measured at 24, 48, 72 hours, and 120 hours (5 days) post-treatment. Toxicity regression analysis was performed to calculate the effective median inhibitory concentration (EC50). [Results] At a concentration of 750 μg/mL, the inhibition rate reached 97.8% after 24 hours and maintained 96.6% even after 5 days (120 hours). The EC50 value was determined as 48.19 μg/mL (equivalent to a dilution of approximately 1500-fold), demonstrating strong antifungal activity. Efficacy exhibited a dose-dependent decline with decreasing concentrations, but high-concentration treatments showed remarkable persistence. [Significances] This plant-derived fungicide offers a novel solution for the green control of rice blast disease by suppressing pathogen proliferation and enhancing plant immunity, combining ecological safety with advantages in antifungal resistance management.

References

[1]  高小文, 王亚超, 孙剑华, 陆骏, 陶传荣. 7.5%茶·黄素可溶液剂对水稻稻瘟病的田间药效试验[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2020, 41(8): 39-45.
[2]  张传清, 周明国, 朱国念. 稻瘟病化学防治药剂的历史沿革与研究现状[J]. 农药学学报, 2009, 11(1): 72-80.
[3]  唐钰朋, 高俊峰, 车淑静. 杀稻瘟剂的作用机制及抗药性研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007(19): 156-157.
[4]  高小文, 孙剑华, 赵艳, 等. 7种杀菌剂对水稻稻瘟病田间防效试验[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2020, 43(3): 253-256.
[5]  吴军. 水稻抗稻瘟病的研究进展与防治策略[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(17): 145-146.
[6]  张喜田, 刘希财. 不同药剂防治水稻穗瘟病田间药效试验[J]. 吉林农业, 2017(2): 82-83.
[7]  胡国安. 不同药剂防治水稻穗颈稻瘟病试验研究[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2016(9): 97.
[8]  龚伟, 李靜波, 黄安辉. 7种杀菌剂对稻瘟病的田间防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2016(4): 116.
[9]  董夕阳, 胡玉龙, 秦亮, 等. 不同药剂防治水稻穗颈稻瘟病田间效果比较试验[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(15): 62-63.
[10]  罗路云, 张卓, 王培, 等. 光合细菌菌剂对稻曲病和稻瘟病的田间药效试验[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(11): 69-71.
[11]  练德进. 几种药剂防治水稻稻瘟病穗瘟效果试验[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(9): 87-88.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133